My profession is driven by speech and argument. I enjoy hearing you compete in these activities and discuss topics. I will always attempt to judge your arguments from a position of objectivity and disinterest.

Please make your deliveries clear, which may mean slowing down and refraining from maximum spread.

In debate formats, I find that effective rebuttals will include a statement about why your side should win on a particular point, usually as a conclusion to that segment of the rebuttal. Of course, the rebuttal should also include factual and argumentative comment that actually does make your side prevail. Don't assume I will understand why you should win without that explanation, but also don't merely insist that you should win.

I am not usually impressed by off-topic arguments or kritiks. Any argument you make should relate directly to the resolution or to the other team's argument.

I expect PRO to argue for the adoption of the entire resolution. I expect CON to argue for the status quo.

I am particularly impressed by use of the crossfires to engage with and turn the other team's argument. I suggest you do not use crossfire to give the other team an opportunity to further explain their arguments.

I hope that you will develop skills and habits that assist you throughout your life, and that you enjoy your participation in speech and debate activities.