I understand both tech and trad arguments. I promise I can understand most spreading but if you think you are one of the fastest speakers in the world just start a chain. I have 5+ years of LD experience. I have 2+ years of policy experience. If no voters/role of ballot/ whatever framework is not given on how I should weigh the round I default util. Shadow extensions make me sad however I will do it. I currently debate for UT Tyler.

K's- I am pretty good with western political literature, some cap literature, some afropess literature, and that is about it. Not to say I will not vote on a K of another topic but just explain the story to me better if it does not fall under that better.

Aff K's- I am cool with it. I just hope you are ready for your opponent to run T.

Counter-plans- Cool with it.

Disads/advantages- I am fine with it but I do have trouble buying brink arguments on the neg side.

Theory- I am fine with it. I am also okay with "meme" theory with something very outlandish as long as you argue it well.

Side note: The RVI on a T debate is silly. The RVI good/bad debate is a time skew (so how are you gonna run an RVI and claim time skew) so like idk that's my take on it. I am basically less inclined to vote on it especially if the T sheet preempts it however I also run it all the time so meh.