I graduated in 2021 from Pine Richland and did Public Forum all 4 years of High School.

PF: While I understand that public forum is getting more technical, I tend to prefer a more traditional style of debate. Generally I will look at arguments and your response to them as a whole and am a solid believer that you do not need to refute every single piece of evidence presented as long as you adequately deal with the larger point. This is not policy. I am fine with debate language, but please make sure it's actually backed up by substance.

Crossfires are important. I will pay attention to them. That said if a key point comes up, please be sure to carry it through your speeches. I like voters in summary and final focus. Carry through your framework if it is important to weighing or a relevant point of contention.

Please don't spread, it will be reflected in your speaker points. Generally, the average debate speaking pace is alright. Keep in mind if you speak too quickly and I don't catch your point I can't weigh it. Please time yourselves (I will keep official time) and be mindful of going over. You can always finish your thought, but after that I will stop taking notes.

LD: As far as Lincoln Douglas goes my preferences are pretty much the same as they are for PF. Make sure to carry through any framework, your value and value criterion throughout the round.

I really enjoyed my time in PF and want everyone else to have the same positive experience. Please be respectful, have fun, and try your best.