NCAA League Forensics
2021
—
Async+Zoom,
KS/US
Sync Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Jan Clark
Minneapolis High School Forensics
None
Vonda Cooper
Republic County
None
Jessica Hakoda
Ellsworth
8 rounds
None
Eliza Hemmer
Sacred Heart High School
Last changed on
Sat February 20, 2021 at 3:27 AM CDT
I debated in high school and began judging while I was in college. I believe the purpose of the debate is active learning and building critical thinking skills. I am a stock issue voter; I am open to being told what debaters find salient in a round and how I should vote. I am also a flow judge, so I like being told how/where to flow. Road mapping is so important to me, that I am fine with them being off time. With that done, and good tagging/signposting, speed is not a problem. If it compromises your ability to read fluently or speak articulately, slow down. The cards do not speak for the debater- the debater speaks for the card (provide summaries or explain relevance). That being said, I am open to Ks and turns. I do not like counterplans, as I think they are a kind of a debate hack. Policy debate is about policy- real world problems, real world solutions, real world consequences. Impact calc and solvency args are important for both teams. NEG teams, I do not care how generic your disad is if you can make a good argument for your link. AFF teams, inherency, topicality and a thorough understanding of your own plan are musts. I like speakers to fill time and take advantage of cross-examinations for clarification purposes. These things ensure a good CLEAN debate (with lots of clash).. because courtesy/professionalism matters! My email address is elizahemmer@gmail.com
Janelle Robson
Ellsworth
8 rounds
None
David Silverman
Sacred Heart High School
None