I am a Speech and Debate Coach. I consider debate a communications event.

Please present your arguments using a professional and conversational style.

I am a “flow” judge, so if I’m not flowing, you are not clear – Be sure to roadmap and signpost. I prefer a traditional style of debate and am big on speaker clarity. I’m okay with a speaking pace a bit faster than ‘normal’ conversation, but avoid monotone speaking and inhibited breathing!

Better evidence is more important than more evidence. Sources matter! Evidence isn’t an argument; it should support arguments. Be sure to extend your arguments, especially after they’ve been attacked. Take advantage of Cross-ex to set up arguments for the rest of the round.

Topics reflect concerns in our society, so take it seriously and do not waste my time with case approaches that do not consider the framers’ intent. My vote is based on the arguments you and your opponent present.

Please don’t be jerky or rude – it will cost you speaker points!

Email to send cases to: terezkyra8@gmail.com

I personally do not favor spreading, but if it is apart of your case please let me know beforehand (also make sure to send me your case).

I will keep time, but I recommend that everyone also keeps time as well. I believe in a fair debate that remains adamant about time. I will not listen to any additional sentences if you go over time. And if you take more prep time deliberately then I will take off speaks.

Make sure to provide roadmaps and signpost so that I can understand where you are on the flow.

I am fine with any argument as long as you accurately support your argument. Please DO NOT go into a round with an argument that you don't understand (trust me: I will be able to tell).

During CX please be respectful of your opponent. I am fine with a "heated" CX but I am not okay with a disrespectful one. I will take off speaks for anyone that is deliberately disrespectful (saying rude things about the opponent's abilities, calling the opponent the wrong pronouns, etc.)

I will vote based off who addresses and refutes the most contentions/cards while upholding their value. I would like to see each opponent crystalize and weigh at the end of the 2a and 2n.

Good Luck!

William B Travis, Phillips Andover, Yale
daniel 'dot' zou 'at' yale.edu

My paradigm got deleted, so here's the gist for the Yale Invitational:

• I debated LD in high school on the Texas circuit, qualifying to TFA State and placing 5th in UIL. This was three years ago...I also coach/debate British parli and novice PF recently. All my debate has been with 'small' schools.
• Run what you are comfortable with. Link chains must be clear.
• Debate about something. Clash...please. :)
• If you're gonna spread, send me the doc.
• I will try to understand new-ish arguments but the safest bet is to treat me like a lay judge. They just need to be understandable and elaborated upon.
• I like the framework debate and there must be clash on that front to convince me.
• Please be kind and respectful. :)

Have fun!