Last changed on
Wed May 24, 2017 at 1:36 PM EDT
LD is first and foremost a debate based on philosophy. It is not policy. Value and criterion are more than just buzzwords at the opening of the speech. Contentions should link back to the value and should be rooted in that philosophy. Good communication is a part of LD. Give vocal emphasis to the parts of your speech your want me to pay attention to. Tag your contentions clearly. Speak slowly enough that I can absorb the argument thoughtfully.
LD conventions and decorum matter. Expect to stand during speeches and cross-examinations. Dress appropriately. Wait until everyone is ready before speaking. Address the judge during cross-examination. Be respectful and attentive to your opponent. If you have scorn for their arguments, choke it down. Ignoring LD conventions shows a lack of respect for everyone in the room, and the activity itself.
I expect good coverage, though I will not vote on unrefuted arguments if they don't come up in the round.
I am wary of intimidation techniques used on opponents. You should win the round on the strength of your arguments, not how much you are able to freak out your opponent.
I prefer to vote on which value structure is better upheld.
I don't respond well to quizzes about how much LD jargon I know. Be clear, be nice, be respectful.
Reading a card/evidence is not an argument. Saying "cross-apply" is not an argument. I will not fill in analysis for you.
I expect crystallization (clear voters) at the end of a round.