TOC Fall Regional Halloween Cup
2023 — Online, CN
General Pool Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideJudge Philosophies
- Judge’s Name: Jerry Ann Atong
- Tell us about your debate judging experience.
-
I have never judged debate before.
-
I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
-
I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
-
I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
-
I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
- Tell us about your debating experience.
-
I have never debated competitively before.
-
I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
-
I debated other formats for less than a year.
-
I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
-
I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
- What is your speaking speed preference?
-
Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
-
Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
-
TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
-
Fast speed (200+wpm)
- How much do you know about the topic?
-
I coach debate and have researched this topic
-
I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
-
I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
-
I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
-
I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
- Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
-
Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
-
No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
-
I’m not sure.
-
Other (please specify)
- How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
-
It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
-
It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
-
It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
-
Other (Please Specify)
- What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
The factors that go into my decision on who wins the debate is 1) how they prove and build their arguments i.e., depth of analysis and logic, 2) the substantives given which may involve the extent of impacts their claims, how they weigh it, and more, 3) how teams effectively rebut and respond to the materials of the previous speaker–whether it be in crossfire or not, this may involve how they prove things to be untrue or false, or how they adapt and flip the arguments, 4) the strategy, how they compare and weigh persuasively their arguments to the judge, and 5) in the context of PF, I am also critical of how debaters effectively utilize evidences to persuade the value and likelihood of their claims.
- Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
None!
1. Judge's Name- Vincent Gaviyao
2. Tell us about your debating experience
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than one year
3. Tell us about your debating experience
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year
4. What I'd your speed preference?
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?
d. I pay attention to this topic, but don't go out of my way to know about it
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker ( frontlining)?
b. No, the second speaker Rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
7. How important is the flow(your notes) in making your decision?
What do you write down in your notes?
a. It's very important, l take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely on my notes
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
portant facts.
I usually decide the winner of the debate based on three speeches rebuttal, crossfires, and summary. As long as you do well in these three speeches, you are guaranteed success.
I usually decide the winner of the speech based on relevance, relatability, and originality. The contestants who show the greatest emphasis on these three sections win the round.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
Lastly, make sure to do your research and prepare extensively before entering the round. Good luck and remember to have fun, everyone!
Judge Philosophies
1. Judge’s Name: Inventor, Luna Yael B.
2. Tell us about your debate judging experience.
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.
a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?
a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?
a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify) Depends on the relevance and the weight of the First Rebuttal speaker’s content—it’s possible to engage with a case and not need to directly respond
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
Engagement and weighing of the overall arguments. Often, debaters can posit good and valid arguments but it often ends in a deadlock. This is usually because there is a lack of a clear outcome, clear goal, or clear trade-off. If a team has two or more of these in their speech, it is very likely that they already have an edge over other teams in the tournament.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you? I have two dachshunds. <3
Hello!
1. I prefer concise and coherent speeches, please try to follow the allotted minutes per speaker
2. Substantiated and structured arguments are highly appreciated. Include a premise, diagnosis, examples, and conclusion for your arguments.
3. During crossfire, have relevant and important discussions. Nuanced questions and answers would be great.
Thanks :>
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify)
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?The effectiveness of your own case—comprising the clarity of your claim, the coherence of your mechanism, and the significance of your impact. Equally crucial is your engagement with your opponents' case, including rebuttals, weighing etc. Lastly, the adequacy and quality of your evidence—encompassing its truthfulness, authority, importance, and influence.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?I firmly believe that it's essential to respect your opponents in a debate, steering clear of any aggressive intentions or actions, and instead opting for a polite and courteous approach.