Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 3:48 AM EDT
Background
Former LD debater (traditional) from Ohio (traditional state). NSDA qualifier 1998. Recently returned to debate as a coach. Law prof.
Circuit Debate
I've judged a lot of rounds, but I'm relatively new to circuit debate.
I believe the pedagogical goals of debate are best served by rounds that substantively engage the resolution. I'm open to any arguments when stated clearly and explained, but I will only vote on arguments that you explain well enough that I understand them. It's your job to offer clear explanations of complex arguments within the round.
Some speed is okay, but please do not spread. You can put me on the mail chain at qcurtis@gmail.com, but this is a speech activity not competitive emailing, so do not expect me to spend the whole round in the document.
Virginia Debate
I flow rounds and vote off the flow when I can. I don't like voting for bad arguments, but I can't vote on arguments that you don't make.
Keep your speeches organized, tell me where you are on the flow, and impact and weigh your arguments. Identify key arguments and give voting issues in NR and AR2.
Don't drop critical points; point out and impact your opponent's dropped points. Affirmative gets some scope to condense the round to key arguments in AR1.
If you feel you won a point in cross-x, make that argument in a speech.
No new arguments in the NR or AR2. Those speeches are for extending arguments already on the flow.
Evidence
Strong factual claims should be supported with evidence. Evidence that simply asserts value or philosophical claims without argument gets limited weight. Good analysis > bad evidence.
Speed
In varsity rounds: Some speed is okay, but keep it under control and make sure you are clear. I will signal with a raised hand if I need you to slow up a bit.
In JV rounds: JV rounds are for learning. A bit faster than conversational pace is okay, but I have low tolerance for speed that might be too much for a new debater.
