SADL Debate Tournament 2
2022 — New York, NY/US
HS Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideEmail: aminatabest1@gmail.com
Would like to be added to the email chain
I have been debating for a minute, I am a k debater I usually go for framework based arguments
Don’t be racist, sexist, homophobic, trans-phobic or any xenophobic arguments
I will really vote for anything just tell me why I should vote for your arguments.
Run whatever you want
Don't say anything inhumane
I will be timing you so don't try to steal prep
Call me Joanne or Judge (your pref)
I'll give you a 30 if you have the best speech in the world
Make jokes related to your speech, I might just boost your speaks
Add me to the email chain: joanneopokudebate@gmail.com
DON'T MAKE THE ROUND BORING, MAKE IT INTERESTING ;).
Contact me at: oyosairee@gmail.com
Bit about me:
--I debated for SAMW/SAHW(it's complicated) for all four years of middle school, I now debate for HSLA-MA doing policy.
--If you lose/win, It's because I genuinley thought you did and will provide extensive reasoning both post round and right after as to why I made that choice
-Don't bother trying to argue it, take the feedback and go, I'll answer questions whenever you have them
preferences in terms of speaks
Try to time yourselves,as a catch all for mistakes.
Clarity over speed, at the end of the day, I'll prefer the most well articulated arguments over the ones spoken the fastest. Open Cross, but 1 partner should not be the only one talking, that makes the other one look bad, which is not what either you nor I want.(closed cross if there is a maverick debating)
Do not say anything disrespectful, or discriminatory, including but not limited to , racism good, sexism good, homophobia good. Your speaks will die
DO IMPACT CALC, especialy if you're a novice. Tell me WHY your impacts are so important, why it's more important the other team
--Role of the ballot arguments--> please don't make me vote on this, I personally think it's a dumb argument, especially in novice, just explain it well
Keep it fun!reference things, add jokes, we're not congressmen here.(yet)
you need to disclose before the round, teams win because they're better, not because they cheat
At the end of the day you're here to have fun and to learn, even if you lose all your rounds you're still learning something
Add me to the email chain:Ryan.Peters@sascholar.org
Stuff about me:
-Debated at DPMS for 4 years, currently with HSLA
-Pronouns: He/Him
Important stuff:
-Argue whatever you want. The affirmative should defend their worldview, the negative should prove reason(s) to why the aff world is bad.
-No racism homophobia, sexism, transphobia...etc. If you do, I promise to give you the lowest speaks I can! (Although, if you unintentionally say something weird and you catch it and apologize, I probably won't do the most; I can tell the difference).
-Be assertive, be you, just don't be plain mean or rude to your opponents.
-You're here to have fun and learn! Lets make this a nice space to be in.
Speaks
Just be loud, clear, and be you! If you are, you'll be alright.
Additional stuff: If you have any questions before round I didn't explain here be free to ask !
Update: If i can not hear/understand you I am not going to flow it. I will try my best but if it doesn't get written then mb.
I've done debate for 5 years now.
Run whatever you want. I'm fine with everything, K's, CP's, Da's, and others.
Don't say anything inhumane. Don't to be rude, say anything racist, sexist, or slander of any kind. If you do something like this, then I will be forced to give my ballot to the other team.
Make sure you add me on your email chains for cases with this email:poppylains@gmail.com
If you spread or speak fast notify the other team, I'm fine with whatever pace make sure you guys are clear, I like speed but I also like clarity.
Remember this is a learning space, we are here to improve not hate on eachother.
Tech>Truth, but if you presude me otherwise I will lean with the truth.
Hi!
email: ksinchi60@stuy.edu
I really like lengthy and in-depth paradigms but my writing style is rather boring...so here are just a few things to keep in mind!
- I am fine with speed, just be LOUD AND CLEAR - I will let you know if you are being unclear, but do not take advantage of that.
- I do not condone any form of hate speech - If you are currently a SADL debater, I most definitely know your coach, and I will report you to them.
- Weigh your impacts, explain your internal-link chain and extend any framework read in round - If you do not do these then there is no reason for me to vote for you
- Do not just card dump during speeches - read overviews, extend previous cards and do some lbl
- Please do not call me judge, it's just very awkward ... (I am not that much older than you, trust)
- Don't be rude, if you want to ask another question in cx cut your opponents off politely (if your opponents are being rude to you in cx I will take note of it)
- Please don't read K's/K-Affs as a novice. If you don't understand every single thing about the argument then don't read it, it's not going to help you
- Only concede the rest of your speech time if you actually have nothing else to say (which is pretty much impossible). There is a reason why we have 8 minutes for constructives and 5 for rebuttals.
- Please do not format your speeches in comic sans.
- Take notes when I am giving my rfd, I am not just talking to talk. I really want you to take away something from the debate round (if you want examples of how to take notes on the rfd lemme know)
- Have fun! At the end of the day, I am proud of you for deciding to dedicate your weekend to debating!
Feel free to email me if you have any questions about the ballot :)
Hi Im Mariama :)
bronxsciencedebatedocs@gmail.com --> add to the chain
hidden.aspec@gmail.com --> add to the chain
Im a senior debater at Bronx Science.
Tech >>>>>>>>> truth
Clarity >>>>> speed
email chain >>>>>> speech drop
i'm probably judging novice, so if its packet please only read packet args. if its open, I don't care what you run but you should only run arguments u understand, I will be annoyed if you cant explain any of your args in cx.
pls time your own prep and speeches, I forget to time but I try my best to time everyones prep/speech.
don't steal prep :((
be nice to ur partner if ur rude to ur partner im docking ur speaks .5 :)
be assertive in cx, not rude their distinct.
for more detail view guy blooms paradigm.
(ma-ree-ah-ma)
Dont read anything racist/xenephobic/sexist etc. its an auto L and the lowest speaks possible.
Free Palestine
(She/Her)
7yrs of policy debate experience
Include me on the email chain -- My email: iby2248@gmail.com
- - -
I'm good with spreading.
Don't be any of the "-ists" (Racist, Sexist, etc.)
Call me Judge Or Ibrahima (Ee-bruh-hee-ma) in round (really wtv you prefer)
- - -
I can be swayed by any argument as long as it is fleshed out well. I believe in Tabula Rasa, although from my experience in debate, I like it when the Affirmative weighs the hypothetical implications of not doing the affirmative effectively. For the negative, any negative argument (traditional or untraditional) can be ran as long as its argued beyond a threshold.
As a judge, I default negative if the Affirmative has not done enough work to prove how the benefits to implementing the plan outweigh the status quo AND any potential harmful aftereffects to doing the plan. Whether it is a Kritik, TVA, CP, etc., the Aff must provide enough defense of their case and can't rely solely on hypothetical implications.
Not too familiar with this years topic so don't expect me to know every term.
- - -
Don't violate any of the non-negotiables: no sexism, no racism, (any of the -isms). No insensitive comments. No blatant disrespect. Treat debate what it is, an academic space and a platform for the voice of marginalized communities and a way for new ideas to circulate.
- - -
More comments can be given pre-round.
---
DO NOT CHANGE YOUR STRATEGY FOR THE BALLOT - I AM OPEN TO ANY AND ALL ARGUMENTS.
Email: kwdebate21@gmail.com *include me on the email chain*
Conduct: Be organized, prepared and considerate of yourself and others. Don't steal prep time and always communicate with me about any tech issues as they are happening.
Decision Making: Have clash with your opponent, compare positions, explain and extend your cards & arguments. In the last rebuttal arguments paint a story that frames the round the way you want me to decide it. I'll vote where you tell me to if there's not significant responses or opposition to it. At the end of a debate it mostly comes down to impact assessment and warrant comparisons. If you do go down the impact weighing route you must explicitly tell me why I should weigh your impact/case over the opposing side.
Aff: Run what you want, I honestly don't care as long as it has some sort of relevance to the topic. If you go down the K route you MUST properly explain your case; I have a substantial understanding of many K literature base, but always prioritize clarity over unnecessary complicated K jargon. If you have a performative Aff you need to extend and explain the relation of the performance to the Aff and to the resolution as a whole.
Neg: Have a clear strategy throughout the debate. Run what you want, just explain. Don't continuously complain about the Aff's strat b/c I promise you I won't care (unless it's absurd, which I highly doubt). Defend your rights to certain links & interpretations. I agree presumption matters but explain why it does; i.e. ground, limits etc.
Extra (Policy):
- I will vote on T/FW if you win the impact it has on the debate
- (DAs) Have clear links and link/impact stories. Have reasons why the DA turns case.
- (CPs) Have a good & clear net benefit. Perms must paint a story of the new squo and what it would look like. Theory is a MUST.
- (Ks) Alternatives need to articulate what their world looks like, how it resolves the links. Be able to explain the FW/warrant in a way which provides negative ground and debatability.
I will time all speeches and will NOT count arguments after the timer.
~ PDM IB: ALEJANDRO SCOTT