Hi, my name is Kasi Krishnan. Feel free to call me judge, Mr. Krishnan, whatever works. I'm a parent judge and am looking for clear and concise argumentation.

Whichever debater that proves their advocacy- or lack thereof- to be better than their opponent's will win the round. Please don't spread; I will evaluate the round based on what I can understand.

I don't have any preferences on what kind of arguments you read as long as you explain them enough for me to understand and analyze. K's, plans, and the like are all fine as long as they are thoroughly explained and I understand the premise, your links, and the impact scenario.

I'd like to be added to the email chain since I like reading along with the speech doc. kasi.krishnan1@gmail.com

Apart from that, note that debate is supposed to be fun and I'm looking for an enjoyable round for both you and I. Have fun and keep debating!

I’m a parent judge who has been judging parli at a handful of tournaments since 2019. I’m comfortable with case debate; counterplans are fine; I’m open to hearing theory. I normally don’t disclose at the end of each round, sorry!

Updated September 2021

I am a parent judge and it is my second year judging (mostly Parli). Having judged at least a dozen tournaments, I am comfortable with terminology and have heard a variety of styles and strategies. That said,

1. Please signpost - it helps me organize my notes and make a decision

2. No spreading if possible, I have trouble flowing when you speak fast

3. You can use theory but it has to be well explained.