SID Fox Debate
2022
—
Salem,
OR/US
Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Ameena Amdahl-Mason
Clackamas High School
Last changed on
Wed February 21, 2024 at 8:08 AM PDT
I competed in policy debate in high school, parliamentary debate in college, and I have been coaching since 2001. I would consider myself a tabula rasa judge, as much as that is possible. I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, but expect clear articulation of said argumentation. I want you to provide me with compelling reasons why you should win the debate. Generic argumentation, weak links, and time sucks are not appreciated. I don't judge a ton (in my local circuit I am in tab a lot), but I did judge at NSDA Nationals in 2020 including some late Elim rounds. I keep a detailed flow so staying organized is key to winning my ballot. Pronouns: she/her/hers. If you have questions, feel free to ask before the round starts. Email for the chain: amdahl-masona@nclack.k12.or.us.
Amy Bartlett
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Thu April 4, 2024 at 11:35 PM PDT
I was a policy debater for 3 years in high school and coached high school policy for 5 years through out college (in Montana). I'm excited to return to the debate world as a parent judge...things have changed a bit, but I really love it all.
l lean towards (and prefer) the stock issues. While I can go on a journey, if you use generic responses (K, Counter plans etc.) it could be more difficult for me to buy. I want to see organization, direct clash and I'll believe whatever you can substantiate with evidence or solid rationale. Debate can be intense, but please have some fun and be kind.
I need to understand what you're saying. I REALLY struggle to appreciate spreading. In my mind, it's quality over quantity. If I don't understand you (or I have to work too hard) it just won't be considered. So, if you attempt it, please, do it well. I'll flow and be aware of dropped arguments, so please pull them through.
Joshua Cohen
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 11:35 PM PDT
I am a parent with 2+ years of experience judging both individual and debate events.
* Spreading: I try to flow all contentions but may miss some in cases of high speed delivery. I favor well developed arguments over trying to overwhelm other side with sheer numbers.
* Theory: Please explain arguments without relying solely on jargon, but if you over-argue your points, I'll assume that you have nothing better to say.
* Voting: I favor competitors that present the most logical arguments, and clearly explain how impacts of their case outweigh those presented by opponents. To win my vote on framework arguments, they must be well developed with clear links to your case.
* Other Preferences: Questions should be concise and relevant, not long rebuttals with a half-hearted question at the end. I don't consider road maps to be off-time. The clock starts when you begin speaking, and I will cut you off if you go more than a few seconds over time.
Holly Daly
Westview High School
None
Alyssa Dodds
Willamette High School
None
Annabelle Farnsworth
Sprague High School
None
Trent Fry
Westview High School
Last changed on
Wed February 7, 2024 at 9:41 AM PDT
Hello,
I am new to judging this year so I ask that you speak at a pace that I can understand as well as your opponent.
Things I like: Off time roadmaps, clearly stating what you are linking something to, summarizing main points at the end
Things I don't prefer: attacking your opponent instead of their case, bringing up nukes because it's heavy when it has nothing to do with the case.
Patrick Gonzales
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Tue January 2, 2024 at 10:58 AM PDT
I have judged debate since 1988. I started programs in San Jose, San Francisco, and Portland. I have judged every form at the state and national level. I am pretty tabula rasa. In fact, one reason we brought Parli into the state of Oregon in 1997 was that we were looking for something less protocol driven and less linguistically incestuous. Policy and LD seemed to be exclusive to those who could master lingo. With Parli, we had a common knowledge street fight. So, I am open to your interpretation of how the round should be judged. Incorporate anything from your tool box: weighing mechanism, topicality challenge, counterplan, kritik, et al.
But, I still have to understand what you are saying and why. . .and so does your opponent. (Hey, now this guy seems like a communication judge. Eye roll.) I will not judge on debate tactic alone; I am not a Game Player . . . though I did play PacMan once in 1981.
Next, I am a teacher. This is an educational activity. Students should be working on transferrable skills--what are we doing in this debate chamber that we will use outside of the room in a classroom or a college campus or life? So, no speed. I will call "clear" to help you adapt to the room. And, while I am open to creative opposition to premises and other kritiks for the round, I won't abide by arguments that degrade a people or an individual. I was stunned when a debater once tried to argue that Internment was not that bad. I do not think they believed this in their heart; how could we have come to a spot in this educational event where this young person felt that this was a viable argument?
Let us have fun and walk out of the room with something to think about... and our limbs in tact! Con carino, Gonzo
Michael Grainey
Blanchet Catholic School
None
Norm Guite
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 11:28 PM PDT
I have been a parent judge for three years. My paradigms include clarity of arguments, minimal jargon and organization.
Michelle Harris
Crater High School
None
Ben Hunter
Ida B. Wells HS
Last changed on
Sat June 12, 2021 at 2:30 AM PDT
I am a lay judge, albeit one with experience judging debate at this point. I am familiar with basic debate terminology and structure, but I have never debated myself, so progressive debating is mostly beyond me.
DO NOT SPREAD. I have already told you I am a lay judge, so make sure you are not speaking too fast for me to understand the words that come out of your mouth. This is debate, not auctioneering.
Be civil to one another. I expect you to show respect to your opponent(s) and avoid any disparaging behavior or remarks.
I appreciate off-time (or on-time) road maps when you can provide them, as well as signposting along the way.
Kennith Jasper
Sprague High School
None
Shobhana Krishnan
Westview High School
None
Sathyan Kuppuswamy
Westview High School
Last changed on
Fri December 8, 2023 at 1:39 PM PDT
Hello debaters or speakers, my name is Sathyan Kuppuswamy. I’m a parent judge and prefer trad and lay stuff. Not a big fan of super progressive arguments so keep it clean and kind.
Pace your speaking, use off time roadmaps, and be kind. Have fun!
Louise McHarris
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Fri April 5, 2024 at 1:02 AM PDT
Paradigms:
I am a debate parent who is in their seventh year of judging. I appreciate respect in a round and will dock speaker points if you are being openly rude to your opponents or to me. I try to flow everything in the round, including cx. Speed is okay, as long as you enunciate. I value organization and strategy in debate, as well as the ability to think on your feet and adjust your case on the fly. Finally, your contentions must be evidence-based: don't make arguments that you can't back up.
Nicole Murray
Cleveland High School (OR)
None
Matt Ogle
Sprague High School
None
Ram Pai
Sunset High School
None
Roman Patchell
Sprague High School
Last changed on
Sat November 5, 2022 at 6:32 AM EDT
I prefer debates with well built arguments. I love it when you can understand your case well enough to explain to me why your case is valid, through use of arguments of definition, value, and fact. I also like impact statements, and I'm strongly opposed to aggressive or abusive tactics in round. Please play a clean game.
Jessica Shelton
Ida B. Wells HS
None
Joshua Skov
South Eugene High School
Last changed on
Fri November 4, 2022 at 4:19 AM PDT
My priorities are straightforward: organization and clarity of your arguments, and thoroughness in addressing opposing arguments and answering rebuttals.
I'm agnostic about spreading; just make sure your pace, delivery, and presentation of information don't get chaotic and disorganized -- that would compromise organization and clarity, a priority stated above.
Keep in mind that, in life and in my judging, one doesn't win through sheer quantity of distinct arguments. If you have fewer but, in your view, more compelling lines of argumentation, make that clear. In real life and good reasoning, arguments are weighted!
Compete hard, but also treat everyone with respect. Snark and humor are fine (indeed, what would life be without them?), but sportsmanship is more important.
Pronouns: he/him. Email for the chain: joshuaskov@gmail.com
Alexei Steele
Sprague High School
None
Taylor Ward
Cleveland High School (OR)
Last changed on
Sat March 2, 2024 at 10:41 AM EDT
When I was a competitor I competed in Oregon Parliamentary. I like arguments about the framework. If you provide a weighing mechanism (or value criterion) that is different from your opponents I want to see why I should choose yours over theirs, the same goes for definitions. I like to see any arguments brought up in the round related back to the weighing mechanism. I'm mostly looking for a topical debate. If you can show that your K is truly a priori to the debate, I'll buy a K. Procedurally, I like politeness. In Parli I like questions, I think they improve the quality of the debate; just a trend, rounds that had lots of questions tended to have better clash. I was a philosophy student for a while, so I love a good philosophical underpinning to an argument. If you have any questions for me feel free to ask at the start of a round.
Andrew Wilson
Crater High School
Last changed on
Sat March 9, 2024 at 1:25 AM PDT
I am a former debater and IEer from 1999 to 2007 and then I coached collegiate speech and debate from 2007 to 2009. I am passionate about this activity and enjoy judging when I can. I have done almost any IE or debate event you can think of. I did 4 years of collegiate Parli debate with an additional 2 years of coaching the activity. In high school I did LD, Congress, and Ted Turner (now Public Forum) debate and a variety of different individual events.
Policy/Debate Paradigm - While I have never done Policy as a competitor, I can flow and follow almost any argument you want to make. I warn you of three things about me:
1) You need to explain the argument you are making or I am willing to ignore the argument. If you explain the argument and provide me with realistic impacts I am happy to vote on pretty much any argument you want to make. If your impacts are poorly developed or are overly dramatic (global destruction, millions dead, etc) I will probably give your position very little weight. I do not know what your cards say so take the time to explain your argument. I will usually make my decision by weighing the quality and likelihood of potential impacts. I was a plan/counter-plan/dis-ad/topicality debater myself, but I have voted plenty of times for well developed critical arguments as well.
2) If you flow me out of the round that is your problem, not mine. I have a lot of flowing experience, but am by no means the fastest. I have from time to time missed arguments because speakers have gone too fast. I will do my best to keep up, but you go too fast at your own risk. I am not saying you need to go slow, just be careful.
3) I really like to see people having fun in this activity. Be creative and be nice to one another. I know it is easy to get wrapped up in argumentation and become passionate about what you are arguing. Always remember that this is a game that is meant to be enjoyed by everyone. If you cross the line between being competitive and being a jerk, you will not find me to be very happy with your performance.
Have fun and good luck!!
Andrew Wilson
Deborah Wise
Cleveland High School (OR)
None
Beau Woodward
Lakeridge High School
Last changed on
Sun January 7, 2024 at 12:19 AM PDT
I have a background in policy debate, so that means that I like structure and specific impacts. Other than that, I am pretty tabula rasa. Please tell me how you win this debate with discussions of burdens and weighing mechanisms. In Oregon Parliamentary, I am not a huge fan of Ks because I do not think you have enough time to prepare one properly, but I will vote on one if the opp links into it hard, like you can show me how they are specifically being sexist, racist, trans/homophobic, etc.