I love speech and debate!! Yay go you!!

Email me, if you ever need me to elaborate on a ballot, or want to add me to the email chain: alorde1712+speech@gmail.com.

I most often judge at the middle school or novice level — this paradigm will reflect that. I’m a senior at Plano West, and I’m the team captain for Plano West Speech & Debate. I mostly compete in Original Oratory, Informative Speaking, Program Oral Interpretation, and Congressional Debate, but occasionally dabble in other events — including experience in World Schools Debate, Prose, Poetry and Big Questions Debate. I’ve qualified to TFA State, NSDA Nationals, and NIETOC every year since freshman year, and made out-rounds at tournaments such as finals at the University of Florida’s Florida Blue Key tournament, semis at Yale & Emory, finals at State, and many more.

General Rules:

• Be kind.

• Do your best!

• Don’t let your nerves get the best of you — no matter what, you got up and competed today, and that takes a lot.

PF/LD Paradigm:

Please don't spread.
General aim: make sure that you're weighing your argument— and carrying it through. If you completely drop one of your own arguments, why bring it up in the first place? Weighing is always an important factor in the round for me: if you can't explain why what you've said matters over your opponents, then you're already lost.
Unless you manage to convince me well enough to vote on something else (thinking of Ks right now, which I'd recommend straying away from in the novice department nonetheless), I'm going to judge based on these three factors, in order: offence, defence, and framework.

Speaking of Ks (and by association, theory) — if you're going to try it out as a novice, it needs to be done well. If you're going to run it, give yourself something to fall back on in the event that things go wrong— but if your opponents fall flat, carry it through! (Which as a general rule of thumb, ought to be your case for any argument.) Ensure that you articulate what the alternative looks like, the role of the ballot, all of the sort, and ensure that your links are strong. Any negation Kritik ought to engage with the affirmation: more specifically, call out an assumption or value of the Affirmation and use that throughout. Don't assume I know the literature your case relies on.

If you're running arguments that require or call for trigger warnings, use them. Speech and debate ought to be a safe and open space for everyone, trigger warnings help ensure that's the case. Err on the side of caution with these: and if a member of your audience or another team makes it clear that the arguments you're running are triggering to them, and you don't adjust your strategy or arguments accordingly, I will dock your speaks. If it begins to impede the debate, it may also have to factor into my decision.

Framework, value, criterion, all of that is important to me— if you and your opponent agree on these matters then feel free to simply use it for your weighing. If not, then you need to make sure that you actively spend your time explaining why your framework best applies to the round. I'm always up for a framework debate, but you need to actually debate.

Speaks start at 28 and go up or down from there.

Original Oratory Paradigm:

I want you to explain things to me like I know nothing. I only say this half-jokingly — when you’re writing a speech, you want to make sure you clearly and effectively communicate an issue to your audience. If you’re telling me that something is a problem — don’t assume that your audience knows everything about said problem. Instead, remember it’s your responsibility to teach & inform the audience in order to persuade us.

Your speech should be cohesive — if it doesn’t flow smoothly & solidly, you’re missing a core component of speechwriting. Your points should connect together in order for your speech to sound like a full, authentic performance, rather than varied, disjointed points.

In my eyes, delivery is just as important as your writing. Tip number one: slow down! I know the limit for Original Oratory feels short, and sometimes it can be hard to communicate everything you want to. But trying to speed up to fit more in means two things: first, crucial information will be lost, and second, you’ll have a much harder time connecting emotionally with any audience. It makes it harder for jokes to land, for hard-hitting moments to resonate, for your speech to feel impactful at all.

Mistakes happen. Brush them off, and keep going. It’s better to trip on your words and show that you can power through them than to make a mistake and go back in your speech to repeat the sentence as is. Unless it’s a source, quote, rhetoric, or another crucial part of your speech, it’s okay for you to just keep going.

Think of the “drama moon” as you deliver your speeches. I’m looking for an emotional journey when I sit down to watch a speech — make jokes, make me cry, make me care, make me sympathise — if you can make me follow along with your speech by captivating my attention, you’ll win any round. But to do that, you have to be varied in your tone, style, and delivery. Nobody wants 8 minutes straight of sadness, or 8 minutes of humour — it takes both to make a speech complete.

Congressional Debate Paradigm:

When you lose the “Debate” in “Congressional Debate,” you’ve lost me. As important as it is to prepare before round, you have to be ready to respond to the points made earlier too — if every speech you give could be identical to a sponsorship speech, you’re doing it wrong.

Evidence is crucial to me — I want to make sure you’re backing up the things you say with reliable sources. Vet the articles you use, make sure your argument is cohesive — because it makes your argument just so much stronger. Obviously, there are some arguments that require a logical chain of thought, or analytics, but where you can use evidence — I’d say do so!

Weigh your impacts! Why should I care about what you’re saying over your opponents? What makes your argument so important? Tell your judges, audience, and fellow competitors just how essential it is that we vote your way, and you’ll win easily. The way to do this often isn’t a line-by-line rebuttal, but by grouping opposing points (especially ones repeated often) and responding overall. Talk about what a world with/without this bill looks like, as opposed to the opposite.

Paradigm:
PFD:

For Public Forum Debate, I don't judge based on cross, but I will take note of points made. Summary is the most important speech of the debate, and it is preferred to be a line by line comparison where the stark differences between both worlds need to be prioritized. When looking at the final focus, tell me exactly why I should vote for you. For evidence, just providing a card is not enough, it needs to be analyzed and explained or it will hold no weight. I am fine with complicated link chains, but I need you to explain it clearly and concisely. Spreading is not something that I prefer, since I personally believe that it is not necessary in this format. Make sure to incorporate persuasion and rhetoric into all of your speeches. I want to see a direct clash of logic and/or evidence and emphasis on significance and solvency. I also prefer to stand during CX and Grand CX.

If you ever need me to elaborate on a ballot or add me to an email chain, here's my email:

haniyyah.zia.1@icloud.com

I've dabbled in several events since middle school (currently in high school), but I have the most experience in Original Oratory and other Public Address events. I am currently a senior at Plano West Senior High School and have been the Original Oratory captain for the 2022-2023 school year. I've had a bit of success with OO, including the TFA State 2023 OO Champion, the University of Texas at Austin 2023 Runner-Up, and a Midwest Finch Legal Oratory Scholarship Recipient. I also privately coach on the side, so if you're interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail!

If you feel unsafe during a round or during a tournament that I am judging, remove yourself from the situation immediately and find someone your trust (a friend, coach, or parent).

If you are disrespectful to the other competitors at a tournament or during a round, I will ask you to leave and contact your coach.

In terms of what I'm looking for in Original Oratory or other Public Address events, I have four key criteria:

1) Have you connected with your topic? In OO where the nature of the event allows one to speak on a topic of their choice, allowing your speaking style and speech to carry your passion for the topic is incredibly important. I'm looking for a heart story, personal connection, or powerful rhetoric that connects your topic to yourself.

2) Do your words reach the audience? Oratory is a public address event, so choosing words that are meant to make the audience feel or understand things in a way that wouldn't be able to be achieved in other events like extemp or oral interpretation is incredibly important. Have you made an effort to connect your topic to the people in the room? When I leave the room, do I remember the way your speech made me feel?

3) Is it believable? Quite often in public address, actions meant to enhance one's performance (humor, drama, rhetoric) takes root, so allowing your performance to support the rhetoric you choose is essential. Do you, personally, believe in what you are saying? One of the greatest compliments an orator can ever get is that they are believable. Do your jokes land? Do I, as a judge, feel like you have made an effort to connect with me?

4) Are your solutions tangible? When I walk out of the room, I want to leave knowing that you provided me with a solution in your speech that I can do the second my foot crosses that threshold. It's not about speaking for 10 minutes (or 7 minutes for middle schoolers) just to have a space to speak. It's about finding an issue you care about and utilizing the power Original Oratory gives you to make a positive impact in the world around you with a solution.

5) Are you having fun? Can I tell that you are engaged in your performance and excited to show me, as a judge, what you have been working on for weeks or possibly even months? I want to feel your passion and performance, rather than simply hear it.