I have been judging Speech and Debate for 4 years. I have judged almost every event. For congressional debate, I let the presiding officer and Parliamentarian do everything and just judge the speeches. I weigh speech and questioning section equally when considering your rankings. You need to be able to question, defend, or attack your's or other's points effectively.

I don't particularly mind jargon, such as um-ms or aah, but I prefer a slower speech compared to speeches that are padded by nothing. I keep a running note on what is said and who said it. I try to get the most important points down on the flow. I value argument over style, but will consider style if needed.

To get things started, I am a lay judge. I do not know much about Speech and Debate, but I am not completely clueless. When it comes to Debates, I prefer formal, evidence based, debates. To get my vote, you will have to show me how your evidence is better than your opponent(s). For Debate, do not use theory debates. Argue the topic given, you will not receive my vote by arguing against the resolution and ignoring your opponent's case. Overall, I am glad to be your judge! Best of luck!