As a debate judge, where I spend most of my time, I prioritize content and persuasion. If you think your opponent has broken a rule, of course, point it out, but know that I already noticed, I am taking it into consideration, and I won't be according a win or a loss on a simple rule infraction like new points introduced in the rebuttal. In every event, I expect a certain amount of logic in your argumentation and also a certain amount of evidence (statistics, expert quotes, anecdotes, etc.), although some events will require more of one or the other. I will always look for clash: address what your opponents say when you speak. And speak clearly, not quickly.

As a speech judge, I prioritize engagement and clarity. Inflection and tone are far more important than speed. Creativity, continuity and cleverness will always be rewarded.

Pretty obvious stuff

Debate is won through good, well researched arguments, not technical "tricks". Don't claim drops when they didn't happen. Make sure you clash and explain why you won clearly - what did the debate come down to?

I'm not particularly interested in a statistics fight. It is impossible for me to know which statistics are more accurate.

Don't spread. It's not fun, not in the spirit of debate and has zero life skill or educational value.

Hi!

I'm a senior and captain of Harriton's (PA) debate team. I'm on the NYPDL's board as Social Media Director, and primarily debate on the east coast, but have some experience with west coast tournaments.

I appreciate well warranted arguments, and will prioritize them in a round. Please respond to all of your opponents points, and explain the impacts of your case. I will vote for "out-there" arguments if you can prove to me in the round that they're true.

Be respectful to me and your opponents. I'm excited to watch your round!

- Rose