How I Judge

• I don’t mind spreading, Points will not be docked off for spreading

• Anything racist, homophobic, or just bigoted in general will not be tolerated in a round and it is a automatic loss. (If you have a slur or offensive word in your case points won't be docked off as long as it’s apart of your case)

• I judge Tech > Truth

• It’s really helpful for flowing reasons for you to signpost and provide a roadmap

• Argumentation is what heavily weighs the round for me the way

Etiquette

• I have no problems with cameras on or off if you would prefer them on please let me know.

• If you want to start an email chain make sure you include me abbotangel25@cps.k12.ar.us

• If there is lag I will ask you to speak a little slower

• Make sure to ask questions before the round

Hey guys, I'm Alayna, I'm a Senior at Cabot High School. I am very professional and I know what I am doing when it comes to debating and I will do my best when I judge.

RESPECT: If I see that you are disrespecting your opponent, it will be an automatic L. This is one of the key components of debate. I DO NOT TOLERATE disrespect.

ALL STYLES OF DEBATE----Time keeping: MAKE SURE YOU USE ALL OF YOUR TIME!!!! Using all of your time is very important, when the timer goes off STOP it's ok, just make sure that you get majority of the things in that you want to get in.

Spreading: I'm okay with it.

Framework- This is important so use it, depending on the style of debate. If you want me to vote on your side because of your framework explain to me why.

Definitions- These are very important in all styles of debate so use them.

Line by line: This is very important in every style of debate, without this it is harder for the judge to know what you are rebutting against. This makes it easier for me and for you as well.

Road Maps: This is very important in every rebuttal speech, giving this will help me and your opponent writing in the flow.

I will not listen during cross ex, this is strictly for the debaters. This is where you clarify any questions that you may have and this is also to make trap questions. This part in this debate will be judged. THIS IS STRICTLY FOR YOU GUYS!!!

IPDA:

This is practically the same as LD but the topic varies obviously.

Use all of your time also keep your time!

Use all of your prep time before the round because it is the most important part of your case.

Spreading is fine if you know how to do it correctly, If you don't know how to then don't spread.

If you have any questions about anything this is my email:

adinealayn24@cps.k12.ar.us

Joelle Buckner

Put me on email chain: bucknjoell24@cps.k12.ar.us

Cabot High School

LD debater

Tech > Truth

LD

This is my main event, so I prefer to see a lot of clash plenty of warrants, and make sure not to drop your framework. As long as you extend and give me decent analysis on framework it will be weighed in your favor. Watch topicality, I am perfectly fine with progressive arguments I especially like good DAs and solid CPs.. sign post so it's easy for me to flow. Speaks are pretty easy, speak confidently and clear, I personally don't care about speed as long as I can understand you.

Congress

I took congress as an event for about a year, make sure you are aware of the P.O. and what is going on in the room. Be respectful and make sure not to be passing notes or making noise while a delegate is giving a speech. I base a lot of points on speech formatting and if it's easy to follow.

IPDA

I judge this kind of like I do LD, as long as you extend your arguments and speak confidently you are most likely going to win the round. The topics are not typically ones I enjoy so make it engaging.

Jackson Crumpler (He/Him)

Cabot High School

PF/Congressional Debater

Hello! I'm currently a junior at Cabot High School, I've been debating competitively for two years now, and I enjoy it so much! I ask for a smooth round, bringing your prior knowledge of debate and your usual debate style. However, if you're looking for specifics and what I prefer please read below for what I encourage, discourage, and things I am looking for in different events.

Encourage and Discourage

I, personally, am an aggressive-style debater. I enjoy clash, love rebuttal, and adore great utilization of the cross-examination and questioning periods. However, with that being said, please do not be overly aggressive to the point that it interferes with the round. Meaning, don't excessively talk over your opponent, ESPECIALLY when you asked them a question; let them answer entirely, and if you have time left, give a follow-up. I want you to show your aggressive style in the form of confidence and composure: responding to the opposition's points thoroughly with great evidence and reasoning. 

Also, please announce your contentions, warrants, and impacts when speaking. Make sure your impacts weigh more heavily in magnitude than the other side, preferably with numerical data. More so, please announce your turns and what contention you are turning when speaking. It helps with my flow, allows me to make a better ruling, and makes your case look better prepared. I'm okay with spreading, but make sure your argument isn't being lost with it, slow down at the important parts, it helps with speaker points.

Contain control of the round: make a good weigher and good voting issues, otherwise, you leave me with a more liberal interpretation of the round, could hurt you could help you, but in doing weighing and voters it shows to me a better-developed case.

Tech>Truth, please be sure to signpost.

Any homophobia, transphobia, racism, or xenophobia will result in an automatic loss. More so, disrespect towards your opponent dramatically hurt speaker points, but I am willing to be more lenient of your reduction if you apologize after the round (depending on how rude you were) because I understand you can sometimes get lost in the heat of the moment.

Congress

Make sure I remember you, don't fall into the background. Continually ask great, RELEVANT questions to ensure I don't lose you and have a good parliamentary procedure. I love rebuttal-type speeches at the end of the bill/resolution, so if you give a good one you're definitely high in my ranks. Show great speaking skills in your speeches and that you're knowledgeable on the subject you're debating, don't give a speech just to get a speech in. Make sure when people are questioning you that you remain confident in your answers, and repeat lines in your speeches if you already covered the question they're asking. When you are questioning other speakers, don't continually speak over them. I don't like rehashing, if you're doing a constructive make sure you either introduce new points or add on to previous points. 

Public Forum

Constructive should have well-established contentions, with great impacts. I prefer a weighing mechanism for the round that is touched on at the beginning, but I don't necessarily need definitions if they are not needed, as they cut into valuable time that could be spent building your case with contentions. Spreading is fine, but I prefer it less in the constructive because this is when you should be developing a good case, and any missed points interfere with the nature of the debate.

Rebuttals should be made with a signpost where you say which contention you are responding with, helps with the flowing of the round. I am okay with spreading in rebuttals. Make sure not to drop any arguments, but please be considerate of well-developed turns, don't start responding to an argument when you have only twenty seconds left because you will most likely not include enough rationale and warrant in your turn. Go over the first cross-examination period if you can.

Summaries should incorporate both a rebuilding of your own case, where you highlight your most valuable contentions and how they have failed to refute said contentions. The rest of the time is where YOU MAKE SURE to weigh the impacts of both sides, and how your side has greater impacts.

The Final Focus should incorporate the voters and the final weighing of the round, why the scale is on your side. Preferably three voters that deal with the structure of the round: dropped points, impacts, etc; this is where speaker points can lean towards your favor if you end with a good analogy or something.

IPDA Debate

Refer to what I prefer in constructive rebuttals for public forum. Affirmative, please be sure to give me a framework/weighing mechanism at the beginning of your speech because it helps not only me with my judging, but also you by giving you more control over the round. Also, be sure to use your questioning period effectively. You should ask questions that you can use for your own rebuttal speeches, but clarification questions are okay. I don't care as much about sources as I do creatively developing and grounding your arguments. Have a fun round, IPDA is meant to be fun. 

Lincoln-Douglas

I evaluate this based on the framework. It is important to have a value and criterion. I need to be able to understand what you are saying. 

~

Anyways, have a good round. Don't be too stressed or nervous, you got this!

Introduction:

Hello, my name is Neil Cunningham (He/Him)

I am a second-year debater, who does, primarily, Lincoln Douglas

I have also done Public Forum, Congress, and Big Questions.

TLDR:

Be a good person, speak clearly, be smart about what you say

Congress:

Be confident in what you say

Don't interrupt your peers

Actively participate in the discussion

I don't encourage fast-talking in this type of debate.

Don't yell.

Lincoln-Douglas:

I am truth over tech, if you argue the bigger picture better, you are more likely to win my vote.

I WILL NOT tolerate any type of clear homophobia, racism, sexism, or transphobia of any type.

Please time yourself and keep track of your own prep time, I will not do that for you.

I do not mind fast-speaking so long as you are clear and not mumbling

Cabot High School

I am a junior who has done policy, PF, and congress

LD/PF:

please don't spread, this is not policy

Make sure to signpost so I know how to flow

Make sure to contend with all your opponents' arguments or else they are dropped

Congress:

Make sure not to abuse the 10 second grace period

When citing sources, don't just give a name and date (ex: Smith in 2020) say where they are from, and establish credibility

Make sure to show decorum and be kind to your fellow delegates

Use Parliamentary Procedure

hi! my name is mariska haddock, my pronouns are she/her, and i’m a junior varsity debater at cabot high school.

TLDR: -read if you're short on time!

be kind people! discrimination of any type is not tolerated and will result in an automatic loss.

include me in email chain - haddomaris25@cps.k12.ar.us or mariskahaddock@gmail.com

tech over truth

i choose the winner based on my flow- be clear about kicks, don’t drop anything

focus on impacts!

flex prep is okay! i prefer cross but if you want to use flex prep it won’t affect my decision

don’t steal prep - its unethical

off-time roadmaps are recommended (unless it’s worlds lol)

number your arguments it makes flowing easier

public forum:

i do PF, so i focus heavily on argumentation and how strong the arguments presented are and the weight of their impacts

i love framework debate

weigh impacts!!!

don’t forget to extend your arguments

try to keep your rebuttals in a line-by-line format

2nd rebuttal should frontline responses in rebuttal

in summary speech, extend terminal defense and offense; extend anything you want to mention in final focus

don’t be overbearing in cross

final focus should provide clear weighing ground- lay out my ballot for me.

don't skew evidence

congress:

speak fluently and make eye contact with the judges

have credible evidence and clear impacts

do not attack other reps or senators, only attack their arguments. it’s okay to reference other delegates as long as it’s in a respectful manner

ask questions!

don’t be repetitive with arguments- reply speeches help the flow of the round

be familiar with robert’s rules of order- i don’t expect perfect knowledge but be familiar with it and try to only make correct/germane motions

IPDA:

make sure arguments are clear and concise

extend your arguments!

weigh impacts! make sure that it’s clear to the judge why your impacts are more important than your opponents

lincoln-douglas:

framework is important and should be clearly articulated

make sure arguments are clear and concise

extend your arguments!

weigh impacts!

any argument is fine- i can flow prog

speech:

try to be reasonably within time

don’t freak out if you stutter once or twice- it’s normal

i generally do bnb events but throw in the occasional oo

make blocking effective and not flashy

i love good cutting- the debate kid in me comes out when pieces are cut effectively and efficiently

drive your point home- similar to debate, make sure your message is clear and impactful

please be kind people :)

- Moderate speed is OK

- Line by line

- Keep it interesting

Racism, sexism, homophobia, hate speech. All of these things will cost you the round and I will make sure that your coach is contacted. However, if you become offended during the round make your claim known and proceed as usual. If you see someone as being looking down on you and only focus your speech on that, you will lose.

I go line by line.

Arguments not involving the resolution in question will not be recognized. Ex: Speech from website, dropped my whole case, etc.

If they drop a point, say it and move on. Dropped points are not enough to win or lose from, saying they're there is a good way to win though.

- Use your time wisely, go line by line, and dont mimic eminem. 11 words per second is not ok.

- Do not make new claims during final rebuttal

- Do not focus on attacking opponent directly

- Be original.

- When it comes to ipda the person with the most interesting arguments will win.

- I don't particularly like LD, so if you speak softly, too fast, or are just too mellow, I will vote you down

I prefer a Truth over Tech kind of judging and I also allow flex prep whenever you have extra time from cross-ex and no longer have any questions. I also prefer that you speak slower and with more expression throughout your speeches but if you wish to speak fast don't make it to where you can't even understand what you are saying. I also don't care if you want to stay sitting down whenever you give a speech and if you don't want to turn your camera on during the debate then you don't have to.

Hello, I’m Carter Kirby, I’ve been doing debate for 2 years now. I’m most familiar with Congress but not totally unfamiliar with other styles. My pronouns are he/him or they/them and I don’t tolerate bigotry of any kind in a round. Be civil and be smart. I tend to be pretty chill :). My email is carterakirby@gmail.com if you have any questions, concerns, or you just think I seem cool lol

Speaking - I prefer clear speaking and persuasion over spreading. It’s hard for me to keep up and I need you to be articulate. Try not to be aggressive but don’t let that stop you from clashing with your opponent-- this is a debate.

Tech over truth

Theory is fine

Arguments - I really don’t have a preference when it comes to the types of arguments you run so long as you know what you’re talking about, present it well, and uphold it well. I prefer a lot of clash in debate and want to see you defend your arguments while criticizing the others. Adapt well to the person you’re debating.

Evidence - As log as it is up to date and not pulled from somewhere that is clearly shady/made up I could honestly care less where you get your evidence

TLDR

-Speaking speed doesn't matter to me

-weigh impacts

-make sure to link arguments or examples back to your case

-Tech over Truth

LD

In a debate round, I really don't care whether you sit or stand when you're speaking. Make sure you answer all of your opponent's arguments. Speak at your own pace but speak clearly so that the opponent and judges can hear you. Make sure to weigh your impacts, so I know which impacts to consider at the end of the round. If you don't link arguments or examples back to your case, I will have to ignore the points or examples stated.

Congress

I don't have much to say in congress. Be kind and respectful to everyone in the chamber and make sure to create a orderly environment where everyone in the chamber can easily debate.

Cabot High School Debate

I am a third year competitor in Debate, I am a Debate Captain at Cabot High School, and compete in Congressional Debate:

Congressional Debate:

Make sure to use parli pro correctly and make sure to speak on Bill correctly

If you are asking a question, make sure that it has relevance to the legislation.

When you are speaking, it has to be topical and within the time limit that is given.

Make sure that there is clash on the speeches.

Public Forum & LD:

Make sure that you give a Roadmap or Signpost

Rebuttals need to be topical and use a good balance of evidence and logic

Arguments should have a clear link to the topic

With definitions don't make them the most important part of the debate

Framework debate can be crucial to win the round.

Clash is also one of the most important things to make the winning points.

Overall: Make sure to respect the opponents and the judge when debating.

Don't worry about your success, have fun and enjoy your time!

Hey! My name is Elisabeth Manuel and my pronouns are she/her.

Cabot High School ~ Grad. Year '25

Congress

Speak well and fluently. You are playing a policymaker, act professionally.

PLEASE do not rehash arguments.

I value evidence and reliable sources along with your information.

Be prepared to speak on both aff and neg.

If speaking over someone, be respectful. (Preferably do not speak over other opponents)

Make sure to be clear who you are speaking to

IPDA

Use your time wisely

Speak fluently and have confidence

Be respectful during refutation

- Be professional; DO NOT use aggression towards your opponent

Be patient with your opponent

Quick facts about me:

- I specialize in PF

- I have judged Public Forum and Lincoln Douglas

TLDR

- Not a fan of spreading; try to go a moderate speed

- I will keep the time of speeches, but competitors can as well.

Be respectful; I understand debates can get heated, but keep a calm and cordial attitude.

• Camera's on is preferable (virtual only)

- Do not use progressive cases! 

PF

- Keep a clear, logical case

- Use prep wisely, you only have three minutes!

- Use reliable sources; it won't cost you a round, but it is preferable.

- Be careful when you come across a divisive case; things can become very messy very quickly.

- Use framework

LD

- Tech over Truth

- Be passionate when you speak; I don't want monotonous speakers, it is quite dull.

I do not encourage derogatory remarks of any kind. If any comment is made, you will automatically lose the round.

Overall, I enjoy a clean, fair fight. You don't win a debate based on how loud you are, but how well your argument is constructed.

I am a debate and forensics competitor, while I keep my judging for those two separate, please know that the more dynamic and interesting that you are to listen to, the more likely I am to enjoy your argument or your piece.

Forensics:

- All I really ask is that you follow the guidelines for the event and that your characterise well. Please speak clearly and enunciate.

- And please be passionate! There is nothing worse than a piece you clearly do not care about

Debate:

I have competed in PF and IPDA, I do not know much of anything about Policy or LD.

- Please speak clearly and do not spread under any circumstances. I would rather you have quality points over quantity of points

- Do not attack your opponents personally. This will not result in an automatic loss but the scales will be heavily weighed against you.

- Provide evidence and give me clash. You could have the best arguments in the world but if you don't link those to framework and your opponent's case, it will be a lot harder for me to interpret what you've won.

- Use the time for what it's meant for. Do not introduce brand new points in the very last speech

- Keep things cordial, no offensive language

- Make sure to cite your evidence clearly or I will consider it just another opinion

Congress:

- Speak clearly

- Make sure there is clash

- Have topically relevant and appropriate questions

- Bring up a new point every single time that you speak along with rebutting your opponent's points (unless it's clearly a crystallization speech)

- You are representing your constituents, tie things back to them

- For my Presiding Officers: I am not going to rank high purely for PO'ing. You need to do a good job and be better than the actual speakers. Mediocre PO'ing or PO'ing an easy room will not get higher rankings than good or great speeches.

Please have fun and feel free to ask me any questions at the beginning of the round. Feel free to give me your pronouns so that I can refer to you correctly.

I prefer tech or truth depending on the topic, so ask if you want

Be funny, that will add to your speaker points.

If you want to do a progressive debate, make sure you ask your opponent first,(or just don't)

Email: mordenannabelle@gmail.com

Personal attacks on your opponent will result in an immediate loss. Any discriminatory language, racism, sexism, ableism or other forms of hate will not be tolerated.

Do not misgender your opponent…it is just like, rude?

LD-

Theory is meh but I'm willing to hear it out

Almost always tech>truth

K affs can be good

Disclosure good

LD-

CX: Just don’t be a jerk, it’s unprofessional and unflattering. I respect debaters who utilize CX rather than just asking shallow questions. Sarcasm is good (just don't over do it)

Speaking-

I'm cool with spreading, just don't spread unless you are experienced in that field. I will drop points for incoherent, jumbled speaking.
-Speak with intent, if you don’t understand or mean the words being read, then you have the disadvantage in the debate. Keep me intrigued, you have a better chance of winning if you are passionate about your case.

Styles-

I respect that there are many styles of debate, however I prefer progressive. I am persuaded by logical and warranted arguments, I love Ks, especially Ts if done right. If you’re going traditional, it is imperative that you provide voting issues or at least a clear reasoning behind why I should vote for you, I think it just spices up the round. Going progressive, make sure your k’s have links. Lack of link takes away from your case drastically.

No topicality arguments unless you truly and utterly believe it is essential to the debate. Otherwise, I believe topicality is abusive of your rights as neg/aff

Fw- I’ll hear anything out; even TVAs as long as it has a solid relation to the topic. Fw is about LBL and explaining why your topic mode is good. The fw debate is very important to me, drop it and I will struggle to vote on your side.

Link turns are good, impact turns to education are great when explained right

If you aren’t going to at least try and maintain clash in 1nr/2ar, don’t bother speaking at all. Clash is essential to the structure of LD, please do not disregard this

IPDA-

Speaker points-

I understand it's not easy to formulate an entire case in 30 minutes, however please try and keep things organized. A messy case will result in lower speaks. Make sure you aren't just speaking to speak, if you aren't sure what to talk about, reiterate previously made points and tell me why they matter. Speak with intent, convince me that I should vote for you; don't simply read off of a script, I could do that myself, it's your job to give meaning to those words.

Clash. If you do not respond to your opponents arguments with either logical or warranted claims, then don't expect me to flow what you said. Clash is very important, if you can provide adequate defense/offense then I'll be sure to weigh that when making my decision

Affirmative- please do not abuse your right to define, debate requires a certain extent of fairness.

Contact me if you have any further concerns, I will gladly answer any questions you may have

Hi! Looking forward to meeting you all in my rounds! I have been debating for almost 2 years, and in this time I have debated a few formats, being BQ, LD, and PF. Pronouns are He/Him. If you have any further questions, please ask them BEFORE the round begins. I do have a few notes about my judging preferences:

IPDA: Although it is nice to have preparation for your rounds, I don't want it to just be about sources. I want to hear how your sources tie back to your topic, as well as your own arguments. Use your sources as EVIDENCE for your argument rather than the BASIS for your argument. IPDA is a format about improvisational skills. I don't want it to seem as if you are reading off of a script for the entirety of your speech. Although not essential, I strongly encourage you use unique arguments, as that is more fun for me as a judge and leads to more interesting clash. PLEASE signpost your arguments. It makes them easier for me, as your judge, to flow. Off-time road maps are encouraged AS LONG AS YOU STICK TO THEM.

Public Forum: Public Forum is my favorite type of Debate, both to watch and participate in. I love the clash in rounds, which is amplified by the cross examination periods. Please be sure to use this period wisely to further your case. Off-time roadmaps are encouraged as long as you stick to them. Please signpost your arguments. Also, I can not stress this enough: DO. NOT. SPREAD.

LD: Don't SPREAD and support your values. That's it. SPREADing makes it SO MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO FLOW and is not fun to listen to.

BQ: BQ is a very fun format and I love the topic this year. I would love to see clash on issues or discrepancies, as well as unique and well thought out arguments. Remember that Big Questions is not a debate about sources, but a debate about the Philosophical aspects of the topic.

Miscellanious:

Be Nice <3

Funny or Creative contention names are always nice :>

If you have any questions for me let me know :D. You can email me in two locations (I would encourage both)

Jaydondakigh@gmail.com

Noblejaydo24@gmail.com

I am more likely to answer if you use my school Email, as I am more active on that one with talking to teachers and conducting debate business. Thank you for having me as your judge! See you soon!

I am a high school debater at Collegiate, and have been doing PF since freshman year. Make sure that throughout the debate you interact not only with your opponents' cards, but also with the reasoning/warranting behind them.

Cabot High School Senior Captain

TL;DR

I’m good with all arguments

Tech over truth

Make sure to not drop points

Don't give fake evidence, instant loss if you cannot provide the cards if asked.

Attack the case not the person, I will deduct a large amount of speaker points if you're attacking the person.

Have fun with the debate

I have started debating at Cabot since 8th grade. I am okay with all arguments. Use whatever you want as long as it doesn't discriminate against anyone. Make sure that you properly explain all arguments and don't just throw out buzzwords and jargon.

BQ

I generally prefer the standard of morality in BQ but if you can give me a reason not to, then that's great. You don't need to have a lot of statistics for BQ. I personally prefer well spoken arguments and slower speaking in BQ, but I will evaluate anything. Make sure you explain how your arguments and cards connect. I'm fine with all arguments as long as they are relevant.

PF

Make sure to take advantage of any definitions you can. Impact is very important policy wise so make sure to flesh it out throughout the entire debate. Fake evidence equals instant loss. If I cannot trust one piece of evidence I can't trust any of your evidence. Just argue well, If I am not given a weighing mechanism I will default to cost benefit analysis. Just debate and do it well, like I already said up above, I will evaluate any argument as long as it is explained well.

LD

I prefer that you link in your arguments and give me a reason to vote for you. Make sure to expand on your points and impact if you have one. These are important parts of the debate and give me a clear reason to vote. Make sure you expand on your framework and show me why I should consider your value/criterion over your opponents if the framework makes a difference. If the framework doesn't matter, then don't extend it.

Although your argument may hold truth I prefer the technical parts of the debate (i.e. you drop what they say about your point, and it is false if they are right). One thing I don’t like is trying to discredit sources just because they are from the past or not within the past 4 years; yes, it is important to have up to date sources, but at the same time it is not necessary if it is an analytical argument. If you do make an argument on the credibility of sources don't just say it's not credible, you also need to explain why I can't vote on it because of the lack of credibility. I know the connection is obvious, but unless you make it that connection, it won't be on the flow. If an opponent asks for a card provide the card or you lose credibility.

Congress

Just don't discriminate against anyone. Answer questions effectively. I don't do congress very much so I'll be frank and just say you're unlucky to have me.

IPDA

Same stuff for LD basically. Just make sure you explain your points well, I think IPDA is a great opportunity to show off the fundamentals of debate.

General Debate Paradigm:

Experienced Coach and Flow Judge and 4 Year High School Debater, World History/Psychology/Sociology Teacher with previous career as a Community Corrections Officer (Probation and Parole).

In my experience, all forms of Debate are a synthesis of examples, evidence, and analysis. Competitors need to dive deep into the resolutions presented and wrestle with the ideas, evidence, philosophy, experiences, and impacts that stem from the resolution while tying back the original intention of the resolution. (Framer's Intent)

In my estimation all possible areas of inquiry are on the table, but be mindful that some styles of debate depend more on some mechanics then others. If you run inherency in a LD case, it feels off. If you try to solve for BQ, that's just wrong. Debate styles need to stay in their own lanes and crossover is risky if I'm judging your round. A note on Spreading: I am not a fan. Debate is about connections and persuasion and connection with your judge. Spreading harms or eliminates all of these. Don't. I will never vote down a debater for Spreading alone but you already have one huge strike against you out of the gate if you do.

I believe in the Burdens of Debate. Aff must prove the resolution's premise as true and correct via the Burden of Proof, regardless of the style. If not they lose. Neg must attack and uphold the Burden of Clash (Rejoinder) and if they do not they can not win.

A quick word on preferences for case presentation. Constructives need to be clear cut and purposeful, lay out all your arguments and evidence, simply open doors or you to walk through in the next speech. Extension evidence is always welcome to expand your points in support in 2nd speeches. Cross should allows be respectful and civil, I do take notes on cross but the points made there highlight your style and ability to think on the fly. Use of canned questions in any form are looked down on.

Rebuttals are fair game but you should always attack, rebuild and expand your arguments in this speech. Repeating points in Rebuttals doesn't increase the weight of the argument.

Consolidation Speeches are for crystalizing the main ideas and presenting voting issues in and overall persuasive and final presentation of your case through points. Please respect the format, arguments that extend well past the rebuttals do not carry more weight with me and are presented too late, make sure to do your job in each segment of the round.

A word about style within the round:

Using excessive speed (defined as 145 or more words per minute, above regular conversational speed of speech) or use excessive points or stylistic tricks to try to disadvantage your opponent in a round will win you no style points with me. If you are speaking beyond my ability to flow or use excessive points within a case I will put my pen down and this signifies that I am no longer constructively in the round. This is to be avoided at all costs, keep your judge “in the round” and go slow, standard conversational pace.

A word on technology and style choice: I have noted in my time as a judge and a coach that reliance on your computer makes you sound robotic and read faster than running off paper. Although I won't ever vote someone down who reads off the computer, you need to make sure to get the message home to the judge with emphasis and good speaks to do well in the round. Having a flat monotone computer voice, spreading evidence, card slamming, and hyper-aggression will not win you any points with me and arguably makes your job harder.

Other Points:

• Case Points for case clarity are gladly accepted.

• Tie things back to framework to impress me and get me on your side. If you "set and forget" a framework or weighing device, its on my flow but not helping you win. This is true for Value Criteria, Weighing Mechs, and Frameworks generally.

• Full Disclosure: I am not a National Circuit judge. If its a new concept that they do it there, not a fan. Proud Traditionalist Debater and Coach here. Don't try to run Progressive theory before the resolution or run Disclosure Theory, won't hold water with me.

• Running Logical Fallacies are strongly encouraged. If you spot one, feel free to call an opponent out for it provided it is valid and you can explain the logical flaw clearly and directly (thus avoiding committing a fallacy of your own.)

• Unique arguments hold more weight then generic arguments, so look for a new angle to gain the upper hand. You have got to prove links to the resolution and prove topicality, if you can't then the claim is bound to fail.

• If you are Aff/Pro and doesn't rebuild and/or extend in later speeches, they lose. If you are Neg/Con attack doesn't attack, clash, and disprove, they lose.

• Observation is good, Observation + Analysis is better, Observation + Analysis+Evidence is best.

• In this world of "technological wonders", I am not on team AI, the expectation is that you write your own case, have your own thoughts, and defend your own ideas. If it is clear you didn't write it and don't know how to run it, I'm not likely to vote for it. Play with AI toys on your own time, not mine.

TLDR:

*any argument is fine with me, just don't be homophobic, racist, sexist, or have any kind of unacceptable language in a round

*Tech v Truth

*pls send documents via email (philltyler25@cps.k12.ar.us)

*Speed is fine as long as you send speech

*RDF is based on flow

Things I want to see in a round

-lots of clash between arguments

-offense offense offense

-impact weighing

-evidence for claims

-cross ex

-try not to steal prep, but I understand with online it can be hard to get ready quickly

-pls signpost/roadmap so ik what your going to say

-I will evaluate arguments based on how they link and how well you defend them

-please time yourself, I will time you, but timing yourself will help you in the round

I will always vote my round based on my flow in front of me. If you drop an argument, it will greatly cost your round and chances of winning. Being a good speaker is important, but won't decide a round.

Specifics

LD/IPDA-

I really want to see a framework debate. I find definition debates boring, but if they will help your chance of winning, then use them. Don't use specific topics for a value, if you wanna use a good value, use justice or morality. In IPDA, have contentions and something to weigh the round on. PLEASE WEIGH IMPACTS! Many times you will just repeat arguments and not add to anything, so use impact weighing to have some variety. You must link your claims to warrants to impacts. In order for me to consider an argument dropped, you must mention that your opponent dropped it. If you want to run progressive, make sure your opponent is ok with it, debate is a learning space, not a place to completely decimate someone and not have them learn how to better themselves. Please use all the time you can in your speech, time management is important, especially for the aff.

Congress-

Having a good speaking voice is very important to me in Congress, more than any other debate in my opinion. You must have good links and reliable warrants to make any claim true. Please please please use questioning to your advantage, it will be beneficial to you if you can defend your points well.

PO- please don't run for PO if you don't know how to. If it is your first time, I will be lenient to you. If no one else will run for PO and you decide to stand up, that will benefit you. Please make sure to keep track of precedence and recency, and if at any time I see it to be false or inaccurate, points will be docked and your rank will suffer.

IPDA:

-Make sure to restate your wheing mechanism throughout your speech

-Give taglines for your points

-Use all of speech time

-Don't talk over opponent in questioning period

-Keep questions short

-Keep facts within your speech

Congress:

-Ask a lot of questions!!!

-Be kind and polite during debate

-I don't mind clash just keep it classy :)

-Use all of your speech time.

-Use parli pro

Madison Rivera (riv-air-uh)

pronouns she/her

disclaimer: my biggest thing is that I will mark you down if you have any sexist, racist, ability, or any offending remarks/arguments. I understand you have to defend your point, but you should do that in a respectful manner.

TLDR

I don't mind if you speak fast, just don't sound like Eminem.

Make sure you speak clearly, if you stutter I do not mind.

MAKE SURE YOU USE ALL YOUR TIME!!! Even if you cannot think of anything else to say just go into depth but do not ramble.

I LOVE WHEN YOU SPEAK WITH ENTHUSIASM! I don't care if you are loud because I am hard of hearing just don't scream.

CONGRESS

Please Speak and be engaged in the round. Do not interrupt and if you need help with motion or anything I do not mind helping. If there are four bills speak on at least 3 out of the 4. Make sure you do not rehash the same arguments over and over again. Understand the topic, don't just read over it actually has some knowledge on what you are debating. Ask questions a lot. If you are PO make sure you know what you are doing unless it's your first time.

IPDA/LD

Make sure you know the topic. Have a valid point and do not ramble. Make sure you use all your time. When it comes to the rebuttal actually rebuttal do not just go over your points. Have a good amount of offense and defense. Do not use any fallacies, include a summary of your neg at your last speech. Be nice and have fun.

A little bit about me :)

- I am a public forum (PF) debater, I have done Lincoln Douglas on occasion but PF is my cup of tea.

- I have judged PF, LD, and IPDA in the past and I absolutely love judging

- I am a public forum captain so if you have any questions or need any help, feel free to email me ~ robbihaley24@cps.k12.ar.us

Now into what I do and don't like in a round. All of these go for IPDA, LD, PF, Congress...you name it

PROGRESSIVE CASES

I absolutely despise progressive cases. Don't try to run them unless you don't have another case prepared. I'm a pf debater, meaning that I like more traditional, slower, and "general audience" arguments

SPREADING

When virtual: If you are anything like me then you love to speak quickly. I feel like with the nature of debate we want to talk as fast as possible to allow us to have as much information as possible. With that being said, when debating virtually I do not like when you spread. When you speak quickly over the chromebook, your words get mushed together because the computer can't keep up. I am not afraid to stop you mid-speech and tell you to slow down. When you spread, that not only affects your opponents but it also makes it harder for me to hear what you're saying.

When in person: Feel free to speak as fast as you like but fair warning, I value content over presentation. I am not impressed if you can speak 400 words per minute. BUT if I can't get all your information written down because you are talking faster than Edward Cullen can run, then that might affect the outcome of the debate because like I said content>presentation

CROSS EXAMINATION

I do not flow CX, the only thing that I will write down is your behavior. Debate is not supposed to be a hostile activity, show your opponent respect and don't talk down to them or treat them like dirt. Standing your ground and a bit of sass is permitted and also encouraged. I love clash but if you start to be mean to each other, it can affect who the winner of the round is.

FLOWING/REBUTTALS

I expect everyone to flow the opponent's case because when you move into your rebuttal speech I strongly encourage doing line-by-line. I will always flow EVERYTHING when judging but I don't want to have to go on a wild goose chase to try and figure out what you are refuting. If something is not addressed in your rebuttal speech I WILL COUNT IT AS A DROPPED ARGUMENT, so do your absolute best to refute all aspects of the opponent's case. If your opponent doesn't respond to one of your arguments BRING IT UP IN THE NEXT SPEECH. If you don't bring it up then I don't know. I will write down what you say and to preserve the fairness of the round, if you don't say it..it didn't happen.

RDF

I don't care who spoke better or who had the better questions in cross, whoever has the most of their case still standing is the winner. If you bring up arguments in your final speech it might change my decision against you because your opponent cannot respond. If you bring up any contradictions or you use faulty evidence you will not be the winner. If your plan is to reform the resolution then the other team automatically wins because you have brought up arguments that the other team is not prepared for. When giving a verbal RDF, I will tell you how it is. If you cannot handle the harsh truth then let me know beforehand and I will only put it on the ballot.

BEHAVIOR

Any offensive, discriminatory, sexist, hateful, harmful words or profanity will lose you the round. If you chose to belittle or as I call it "mansplain" words, events, or actions to your opponent you will lose. I do not tolerate people putting down their opponents based on their sex, race, sexuality, religion, culture, or appearance. Debate is meant to be a safe space so if you disrupt the peace, you will lose the round, and Selah or your coach will be hearing about it directly from me. (Which you do not want because I am very blunt.)

Best of luck to you in your rounds and I can't wait to judge for you!

EJ Robertson (She / Her)

Cabot High School

I have been in the Cabot Debate program for 3 years now. I have competed in Congress, Extemp., BQ, World Schools, and PF.

TL;DR

Tech over Truth

Articulate well, moderate speed. I won't flow what I don't understand.

Make it interesting, I like a lot of clash

Line-by-line rebuttals

Make sure to be confident in your speaking and have fun!

Public Forum

A really good speaker is usually what sets one side apart from the other, so make sure to be confident and articulate well. Framework is usually neglected, but I feel that’s one of the most important aspects of weighing the round. I like unique arguments, but make sure that they have solid reasoning. Clear road maps are important, and a line-by-line on the rebuttals make it a lot easier for me to flow and evaluate the round. Make sure to be respectful, don’t say anything that’s racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. because that shouldn’t really be part of debate. Clash also makes the debate more interesting, and it makes it easier to see which arguments are conceded to or dropped. Don’t make any new arguments during final focus, as it makes it difficult for the opponent to respond. Weighing is important because it tells me how to evaluate which side won. I also enjoy impact debates, but don't focus on it too much / go off topic because of it. Give enough time to rebuild or crystalize all arguments, don't spend too much time on one and neglect the others.

Lincoln Douglas

Again, speaking is VERY important, so make sure to speak clearly and confidently. Framework / Value and Criterion are extremely important, as they show me how to evaluate which side I give the win to at the end of the day. I like unique arguments that really challenge the other side. I like impact debates, just don't focus on them too much. Do a line-by-line rebuttal, because it makes it easier to flow. Make sure to be respectful and don’t say anything that is racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.

Congress

Quality > quantity. Make sure to be confident, remember that you’re talking to your fellow delegates, not the judges. Road map should be clear so that I know where to flow on the ballots. Make sure your arguments have good impacts, and going a little over time is better than going under imo. Questioning period is important to reinforce or build up arguments, so make sure to answer questions with substantial arguments. PO should know how to do their jobs, keep time, and use precedence and recency to call delegates. Make sure to be respectful during the debates and have fun.

I don't really have anything specific I like or dislike, just note that when were doing virtual that lag is a thing and to pace your words. When it comes to tech over truth it comes to the topic in hand. crossex is probably a big deciding factor for me.

If you do an email chain, include me simsmikay24@cps.k12.ar.us

No disrespect will be tolerated.

No discriminatory comments.

Best if you kept your own time.

Lincoln Douglas

tech vs. truth

link all arguments to value

IPDA

tech vs. truth

Speech:

use all of speech and prep time

if you speak fast send opponent and I your case

go down flow when refuting

don't make up new points in your last speech

CP:

run them

Flow:

road maps are appreciated

let me know your order so I know how to flow

Hi, my name is Webb Storer and I have been debating PF for 2 years. I have also debated congress and LD in the past.

Debate:

Do not spread - I can deal with some speed but excessive speed will end with me not being able to flow and understand your arguments.

Signpost please. If you do not signpost I will not know where to put your arguments and make it hard for me to vote on any of those arguments. Tell me exactly where I should be putting arguments.

I can deal with any type of argument as long as it is warranted. With that being said if you don't explain to me why your arguments matter then I am going to have a hard time voting for you.

I am not going to make any assumptions, clearly explain why it matters and what it means and don't assume that I understand because it is implied. Tell me exactly where and why I should put your arguments on my flow.

Do not assume I know the resolution. State it in your speech or tell me before round so that I can understand judging better because if I don't know the resolution it will be hard for me to judge the round.

I will automatically vote against you if you are homophobic, sexist, racist, ableist, transphobic, etc... as well as tanking your speaks so just make sure that you are being accommodating and considerate please.

I am truth over tech to a certain extent, what I mean by that is I will mostly look at what is true but if one of the competitors drops all of their opponents arguments I will take that into account. I am ok with flex prep, but the questioning period should mostly be used for questioning. I am not ok with stealing prep. I am ok with a fast speed however if you know that you are a quick speaker I ask that you email me your case. Speaking fast because of nervousness is a thing I do that as well I do not count off for that, at the end before I make my decision I might ask for clarification. If the competitor would like to offer a roadmap I will usually count it off time. If an opponent wants to stand up while speaking that is ok but I do not require or take of points if someone decides not to stand while speaking. If you have questions about me or how I judge or anything really feel free to ask me before the round starts. If I misunderstand something call me out on it.

IPDA is what I am used to. One of my biggest things with IPDA is I do not want the competitors to be stressed which can be difficult because you only have 30 minutes to prep but I do not want that to effect the opponents speech, so if you need just a moment at the beginning before the round starts just ask.

I do not have a lot to say about other types of debate except I want the round to be as stress free as possible so the main part of this is try not to stress.

truth over tech to an extent

ok with flex prep

not ok with stealing prep

ok with fast speed but if you are a fast talker I ask that you email me your case

roadmaps of time

I do not care if you stand or not

If you have questions about anything really just ask

If I misunderstand something call me out on it.

If you are stressed and need a breather tell me

Try not to stress

Hello! My name is Bentleigh Tuck (she/her).

General:

My role is to listen, flow, and weigh the arguments based off how I am told to weigh by each team.

Make sure to keep your own time even though I will also be timing.

You can win my ballot best if you:

1. Truly understand and explain your arguments

2. Explain the impacts of your arguments well

3. Make sure everything is organized - including your overview

4. Tell me how you want me to weight the arguments (ex: you should judge this debate with the best interests of the people at heart)

Unethical behavior: There is no tolerance for any racist, homophobic, transphobic, ablest, or violent comments. Treat others how you want to be treated.

Congress:

For congress I really like to hear rebuttals against other speakers, good questions that help a questioning period get into depth, and speak clearly while being efficient with your time. You are roleplaying as a policymaker - act like it. If you are PO make sure you take charge of the chamber as it is your chamber, don't let them talk over you but still be respectful. Be prepared to speak on affirmative and negative just in case.

LD/PF:

Use speed to your advantage- speak fast and clearly so you can get as much information to your opponent as possible. I don't really like hypothetical situations- I want facts with sources (cards). I love a good cross ex so make sure to keep questions argumentative and relevant to the case.

TLDR

- Don't care if you talk fast just don't spread*

- weigh impacts

- Truth over Tech*

- good clash

- love logic

- signpost

- speak confidently

- use impact calculus *

Lydia Veazey

She/her

veazelydia24@cps.k12.ar.us

tech over truth

speaking- I prefer clear and persuasive speaking rather than spreading.

I do not tolerate bigotry.

How to win my ballot

explain your links and impacts of all arguments.

be well organize.

tell me how I should write my ballot, and why.

you can do evidence comparison as necessary.

IPDA-

Having clash with your opponent is always best during the round.

Make sure your arguments are clear and well understood.

When in the round use up all of your time.

Do not bring up new arguments during your last rebuttals.

During the question period give “to the point” answers. Don't ramble on. It is a waste of time.

A good tip is to really hit on your impacts all during the round.

flow all throughout the round.

Congress

Know your speech.

Answer question without rambling.

Quantity over Quantity

Speak clearly and use up all time.

Have confidence

Have fun with debate!

Mark Warford

IPDA Captian @ Cabot Debate

IPDA:

The way I judge rounds is fairly simple, I like to have good clashes in rebuttals and look for arguments that get past or debaters don't talk about. I will look for the side that takes down more of the other side's points and defends themself. I would love it if both sides gave a weighing mechanism and a roadmap. Something that I am always open to is discussion debate, it can help make the round more enjoyable from a judging standpoint and I encourage it. The last thing that I will judge on is how good your points are, since it is IPDA I won't be judging so harshly on evidence but your points need to make sense.

PF: I vote mainly on the voters you give me, if you dont have clear voters then I will vote on what i think is important and it may not be what you think it is (if one side has voters and the other side doesn't then im going to lean more toward the side with voters). Go down the flow it makes it much easier for me to flow all of your agruments in the right spot. Don't spread if I dont know exactly what you said I wont write it down.

LD: Make your Framework very clear so I understand exactly what it is but dont make it a framework debate. Dont spread if I dont know what you said I wont write it down. I vote mainly on voters, if you dont have clear voters then I will vote on what i think is important and it may not be what you think it is (if one side has voters and the other side doesn't then im going to lean more toward the side with voters).

Congress: I've done alot of PF so I like reliable sources. Be ready to speak on either side of the bill. Try and fill all of your time in your speach but if you have nothing new to add then just leave it at what you have and ask questions. questions are important to me it shows you are still engaged in the round and will give you extra points.

IPDA: jsut try to fill all your time have a good ofense and defense, and be sure to speak well. good luck