Last changed on
Thu February 18, 2021 at 2:56 PM EDT
I am tabula rasa when it comes to judging. I expect competitors to tell me the judging criterion for the round in their constructive speeches and then explain how they have won the round using the judging criterion for the round.
I like a clean flow, so make sure you are signposting as you go along. In other words, tell me where on my flow pad to put the argument you are making/evidence you are using. Be sure to tell me where to cross apply your arguments and evidence. Don't assume I will automatically know where to put it and do it for you.
I debated and competed in individual events in high school and college (NSDA was the NFL back then!). I enjoy everything from topicality to counterplans to kritiques. I was that kid, who ran a space case when the topic as on the earth's oceans way back in the day.
I am open to taking the round wherever competitors want to take it. With that said when it comes to K, I do have a bias towards the resolution as it is written. The presumption is that competitors should be debating it unless they provide compelling arguments and evidence to the contrary. If you are going to think outside the resolution, make sure you are providing sound arguments to compel me to go there with you as your judge.
Debate is fun. It is more than okay to be passionate about your case and your position. It is not okay to be rude to another competitor.