2021 BDL Virtual HST3
2021
—
MA/US
BDL Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Oluwatobi Abubakare
Hire
9 rounds
Last changed on
Fri January 14, 2022 at 6:24 AM EDT
Debated for University of Rochester for 6 years in Varsity Policy Debate and BP/Worlds Debate
Coached HS policy debate for 1.5 years
Currently a Clinical Psychology PhD student at Indiana University Bloomington
And yes, I would like to be on the email chain: oabubaka@u.rochester.edu
Borrowed from the Glass man himself: "If you are a debater with accessibility (or other) concerns please feel free to reach out to me ahead of the round and I will work with you to make the space as hospitable as possible."
Honestly, just do what you want in front of me and just explain your arguments. I will vote on how you want me to vote (since how I see the debate may not be the same way you think you are articulating).
Also, if you can, I prefer debaters to slow down when in front of me. I am not the best judge for you if you decide to spread as fast as Harvard MS or Northwestern MV (although Arjun is very clear).
If you read high theory, do not pref me unless you are willing to explain your argument. My area of study is in psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, and disability studies so I am not hitting up the latest post-modern/structuralist/etc. papers.
Nayelie Acevedo
English High School
9 rounds
None
George Acostalemus
Hire
9 rounds
None
Last changed on
Sat February 13, 2016 at 10:51 AM EDT
I have debated four years of policy in high school. I was able to attend 2 National Forensics League Tournaments and 2 National Association of Urban Debate Leagues Tournamens and have even done this Harvard tournament before.
I am comfortable with most arguments such as K's, T's, and DA's, however prefer debates with high levels of clash and spefic links of negative arguments to the affirmative. The debate always comes down to the rebuttals for me... whichever team is able to persuade me that their impacts outweigh their opponents should have the win.
Side note: I have not judged too often this year so not use to the resolution that well. Also be careful when you spread, I prefer you not go all out and take time on your tags so I can catch them.
Sumit Agrawal
Hire
9 rounds
None
Elvis Alvarado
Boston Collegiate Charter School
9 rounds
None
Fabio Amado
Boston Latin Academy HS
9 rounds
None
Addie Ansell
Mary Lyon High School
9 rounds
None
Karen Aubourg
Neighborhood House Charter School
9 rounds
None
Monique Aziza
Dearborn STEM Academy HS
None
Paquita Bass
Boston International Newcomers Academy
9 rounds
None
Latrice Bates
Hire
9 rounds
None
Khudeja Begum
Charlestown High School
9 rounds
None
Kyree Blackwell
John D. O'Bryant School Of Mathematics And Science
9 rounds
None
Gillian Breuer
Hire
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sun July 19, 2020 at 9:12 AM MDT
I'm a tab judge. Debated Policy through high school, BP in college, now I coach for the Denver Urban Debate League. I don't feel any particular way about theoretical positions or certain authors. I'm fine with speed. I am not likely to vote on tiny technical drops unless they have been seriously impacted out by the opposite team. I think debate is a game, and we are trying to make thoughtful and strategic moves to best our opponent, so I will reward analytical steps taken towards that objective. I vote on K affs, including affs that don't defend a plan text and pretty much anything you're willing to throw at me. My pet peeve is poorly extended warrants. At the end of the day, you should be telling me why you win. Your rebuttals should write my RFD for me. More than happy to provide additional feedback or advice outside of rounds, contact me by email.
Andrew Brokos
Hire
9 rounds
None
Glenton Campbell
Hire
None
Lori Cawthorne
Hire
9 rounds
None
Kent Chen
Josiah Quincy Upper School HS
9 rounds
Last changed on
Tue February 18, 2020 at 3:52 AM EDT
Put me on the chain with this email: chen.kent@husky.neu.edu
Did policy for 4 years in hs
I don't care if you run kritik or policy as an aff just make policy interesting if you are. I vote on the flow, Don't just read a card and don't explain why you win on an argument. Make sure you know what you're saying. Please clash and explain, it makes it easier for me to vote. Do the work for me on the flow.
I can't stress this enough, please explain why you win an argument and why you should win. It gives you so many advantages to just tell me what to do on the flow rather than assume that I'll know what your intent is.
Sign-post, makes it easier to flow.
Roadmap, makes it easier to flow.
I'm okay with whatever speed you read at, just make sure I can understand what you're saying.
Generally I give 28's. Please don't make me give anything below.
Generally you should pref me low if you a policy aff, if you do run policy make it interesting. I don't like the use of nuclear war as an impact for extinction, something like climate change as an impact is better.
Michelle Chen
Hire
9 rounds
Last changed on
Mon January 11, 2021 at 2:18 PM EDT
michellechen617 [at] gmail
hi all
my name is michelle, i debated for 4 years at bvnw and graduated in 2014. i have been out of the game for a while so please keep that in mind. speed is fine but if i can’t understand i won’t flow
you should do whatever you’re good at - i will evaluate everything in the round
that said -
- framing + judge instruction is really important to me. good line by line debating + impact comparison is great
- i really love a good case debate. i like cps that are competitive. i think impact turns are fun
- if you go for t commit to it and do so like a disad
- i will vote for k’s but probably need more explanation (this is me telling u i need some hand holding, not that you shouldn't run one)
Cornishia Cherrie
Hire
9 rounds
None
Christina Chow
Hire
9 rounds
None
Ty Coleman
Charlestown High School
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat December 11, 2021 at 6:09 AM EDT
Email: colemant@union.edu
Whats POPPIN, My name is Ty and I am a first year in College. I started debating my sophomore year of high school, and in my second year of debating, in my junior year, I won Maverick City's champs in Boston. Throughout my debate career I ran K affs and Ks, I barely ran any policy arguments, but it does not mean I am going to just dismiss policy args and tech debate. I have participated in NAUDLS, and other national tournaments, Spreading is okay, just be clear and pronunciate. The point of debate is not to spread so fast that no one can understand you, it is to learn from one another and develop better critical skills, which is important in the real world.
Do's:
- Offense first, not defense: Many debaters go straight into their speech and try to answer all their opponents arguments first before even extending their case and offense, which is not good. I want you to start all your speeches with your offense and winning arguments before you go into defensive mode. You can apply your offense to your line by line when you go down it and impact compare arguments, which is fine, just make sure to be clear about your offense, why your arg is winning and the impact that that argument has on the decision of the round,
Road Map Pretty Please- Road maps are cool and I would like one, I think that it makes everyone's flow cleaner, and if you are able to stick to your road map throughout your speech, which many debaters, including myself, have a hard time doing, it will make everything easier for you and it will feel more organized.
EyeHawk your opponents arguments LOL- What I mean by this is DO NOT let your opponents get away with dropping an argument and not bring it up in your speech, I will cry, not literally, if I see that after a speech you did not catch or mention a conceded/dropped argument from your opponent, picking up these things will help you alot.
Rebuttals Are Key- Rebuttals matter a lot and have the potency to change the whole round, so BRING THAT HEATTTTTT, and make sure you hit on ALL cylinders, Destroy you opponents in these speeches because you ONLY GET ONE!!!
Other than that, enjoy Debate and Have FUN!!!
Carlos Contreras
Somerville High School
9 rounds
None
Debohra Dagnachew
Boston Latin Academy HS
9 rounds
None
Chenita Daughtry
Hire
9 rounds
None
Richard Davis
Brighton High School
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat February 17, 2024 at 5:41 AM EDT
Tell me what you advocate.
tell me why it is not being done
tell me why it needs to be done
tell me why it is the best thing we should do
Chris Day
Charlestown High School
9 rounds
None
Sam Diener
Boston Collegiate Charter School
9 rounds
None
Dat Do
Hire
9 rounds
None
Alisa Drayton
Hire
9 rounds
None
Alison Eggers
Hire
8 rounds
None
Hutshie Faugas
Hire
9 rounds
None
Kelly Flores
Josiah Quincy Upper School HS
9 rounds
None
Charlotte Frazier
Hire
9 rounds
None
Carlota Gimenez
Hire
9 rounds
None
Willie Gomez
Margarita Muniz Academy
9 rounds
None
Jenny Goodman
Dearborn STEM Academy HS
9 rounds
None
David Halperin
Hire
9 rounds
None
Adrian Haugabrook
Hire
9 rounds
None
Angela Haugabrook
Hire
9 rounds
None
Katrina Huff-Larmond
Hire
9 rounds
None
Eric James
Brighton High School
None
Michael John
Boston Latin Academy HS
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat February 12, 2022 at 3:35 AM EDT
Debated for the Boston Debate League.
I will vote on anything as long as its well articulated and you outline the voters and impacts very well.
Speed- Fine when it's done well -- be clear or I won't flow. I will usually tell you if you are not clear once.
Evidence & Arguments- I want a comparative analysis, I prefer debaters that explain the warrants within the evidence and that have good line by line.
K's- Make sure that the link is very well articulated. Also clearly explain the story of the criticism, don't assume I'm familiar with the philosophy you utilize.
Don't disrespect anyone in the round
Logan Johnson
Hire
9 rounds
None
Jacqueline Jones
Hire
9 rounds
None
Ryan Kim
Hire
9 rounds
None
Carrie King-Woodson
English High School
None
Priya Kukreja
Hire
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat March 2, 2024 at 3:35 AM -06
Priya Kukreja (she/they)
priyapkukreja@gmail.com
Hello! My paradigm was wiped (sigh) so here is a TLDR for NYC PF:
Background - I debated in Lincoln Douglas in Nebraska and on the National Circuit from 2014 to 2017. I have experiencing judging PF but I am not an expert with the format - please carry arguments through and articulate why I should vote for you clearly at the end of the round. I cannot do any work for you on the flow, so clash and impacting your arguments is key!
Westside LD:
I feel most comfortable judging critical and phil/framework debate. I'm happy to evaluate T/theory or policy arguments too, but you'll have to slow down, be clear about every part of the argument, and be explicit about the function it serves in the round. Please give me a way to weigh the impacts, e.g. value/criterion, standard, ROTB, etc.
Clash! Engage with your opponents argument. Impact your arguments to your fw/rotb. Take the last few seconds of your final speech to tell me why I should vote for you.
Speed - Stay around 6/10 and you should be just fine. Slow down on tags and author names. Please don't be rude.
Debate is a wonderful opportunity to learn and build community, please treat it as such!
Selina Lim
Hire
9 rounds
None
Anna Lyons
Boston Collegiate Charter School
9 rounds
Last changed on
Fri April 8, 2022 at 9:21 AM EDT
You can add me to an email thread if you find it completely necessary (annamarielyonss@gmail.com), but I strongly believe I should be able to understand and grasp your argument without it. I am judging on what you say and how you say it, not anything else.
I competed in policy debate in high school, went on to work with the Boston Debate League for a summer, then coached for a year. I am now a linguistics and political science student at the University of Southern Maine, so I look for a strong grasp on the language being used. Language is fluid, use that to your advantage.
I really value consistency and clarity. I see logical consistency as the key to winning a debate round; the way you choose to present and organize your thoughts can make or break, regardless of substance. I care far more about strong evidence and reasoning than technicalities, though I do still appreciate and understand the value occasional in them, I usually will not let a debate be won on a technicality unless it is dire.
I do not mind a fast pace, so long as it is a pace that you can maintain without getting too caught up. Please don't speak fast just to speak fast or cram info in. I would take a couple of well articulated and thought out pieces of evidence over a surplus of rushed evidence, it is truly a quality over quantity matter.
My biggest debate pet peeve is just reading straight off the card too much. Definitely refrain from doing so. I am open to whatever you want to do, K's or theory or whatnot, but do it right. Again, I would vote for a logical and consistent baseline argument over a poorly done theory argument.
Obvious rules like no racism, homophobia, disrespect to other team, and etc., all apply, and all will result in an automatic loss. All in all, remember- you can be competitive, you put a lot of time and effort into this, but don't let that get the best of you. Debate is supposed to be fun (:
Tung Mai
Excel High School
9 rounds
None
Evelyn Martinez
Madison Park Technical Vocational High School
9 rounds
None
Kelsey McChane
John D. O'Bryant School Of Mathematics And Science
9 rounds
None
Alejandra Melchor
Hire
None
Masill Miranda
Hire
9 rounds
None
Kaltuma Mohamed
Hire
None
Fabrice Montissol
Excel High School
9 rounds
None
Melissa Moore
Margarita Muniz Academy
9 rounds
None
Abbey Moran
Hire
9 rounds
None
Garshae Mowatt-McKenzie
Hire
Last changed on
Sat May 1, 2021 at 4:42 AM EDT
Hi my name is Garshae, I am a freshman in college and I have debated for y years. I started off doing parliamentary debate in middle school then after switching over to high school debate I engaged in policy debate for 2 years. After two years of policy debate, my last year of debating I did performance debate. With that being said I am open to all forms of debating. My only request is that you keep debates clean, fun, and respectful.
Maddy Nam
Brooke High School
9 rounds
None
Siva Narasimhadevara
Margarita Muniz Academy
9 rounds
None
Greg Nelson
Dearborn STEM Academy HS
9 rounds
None
Dilon Nguyen
New Mission - BCLA - ACC
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat October 21, 2023 at 7:38 AM EDT
Updated: 10/19/2023 Rounds judge for this year: 7
I coach for the John W. McCormack middle school and coach some of the open division kids in the Boston Debate League.
email: dilon.debate@gmail.com , please add me on the chain. Also email if you have any questions/concerns.
My name is Dilon (he/him/his), I debated for 6 years in the Boston Debate League. Been to a couple nat tournaments.
-I was the 1A/2N if that matters to you.
if you only have 10 seconds to know how i am as a judge: Tech>Truth \\ pref me low for Policy. I'll vote on anything you read, I've done cp's and da's to performances. It really comes down to what you tell me to vote on and why(GOOD & CONCISE IMPACT CALC WILL LITERALLY GIVE YOU THE BALLOT). I will most definitely not do work on the flow for you so please keep that in mind. I'm also not super well-versed in high theory K's but can hang if contextualized well.
Keep these things in mind because I take these rules/thoughts very seriously:
1. Be cordial, I want a good debate where both teams are able to learn and have fun. Be funny! I love when a round is fun and I can converse with y'all normally!
2. I do not want to see a veteran team running high theory stuff against a team that is new to debate because you think they can't answer it; it can and may discourage new debaters to ever debate again. Also, disrespect is taken very seriously; it'll reflect on your speaks. I debated in a UDL so i know the huge gap in debate, so please be respectful to every team.
3. Weighing cards is better than giving me multiple pieces of evidence without any impact framing/calc. It'll be rewarded if you can tell me why pieces of evidence are important.
If you say Jessie Pontes loves Framework debate, I might just give you a 30.
The Nitty-Gritty:
there's a thin line between funny and rude so remember that. Be you, do you, be respectful. :)
AFF: run whatever you like. I've ran K AFFS, Policy, and even aspec policy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. The aff has a burden of proving something, so prove to me why I should vote for you. It's simple really, I just go on a daily explanation of why my solvency mechanism makes sense instead of giving way to many advantages and never explaining them.
K AFF: I love K debates. But, that doesn't mean you can just run anything and assume I understand. I need something to vote for and why I should vote for it. Explanations are needed just like any argument you make in life. That being said, treat it like you would treat any aff. Run it, tell me why it's important and what I as a judge can do by giving y'all the ballot. TVA's are amazing, metaphorical interps awesome, and solid contextualization of philosophies make me super happy. Please! DO NOT CHANGE YOUR STYLE FOR ME! DEBATE AS YOU PLEASE!
K: Don't read lit that is about racism, sexism, ableism good; I will not let the round go on. Also, high theory like nietzsche, Lacan, Agamben, psychoanalysis etc. i'm not to familiar with but if you just explain it like a good story, tell me why the AFF links to the kritik, how it triggers the impacts, and as long as there's good contextualization then I'm all for it. Also, please please please give me a reason to vote on the alt/advocacy, I want to hear what I am doing as the judge by giving you the ballot, not some BS "don't vote aff cool thanks!" kind of alt.
FW/T: give me a voter, why do I say this? No one ever extends voters in the 2A/NR which then cost them the round. TBH, why does your interp matter? How does it allow the opponent then to be apart of it? Why is it something that must be addressed within the round? these questions matter and must be answered.
DA: give me a good link story and impact calc. don't make me do work on the impact calc. I need to hear a real clear reason on why they trigger imp. if it's not explained then i probably won't evaluate it.
CP: sure, go for it. Give me a reason on why the CP is a feasible solution to either solve the aff and the "disad(s)".
Speaks: speed, idc but i need to hear a tag and author. I'm super lenient w/ speaks because everyone has their own style.
Misc: people who have influenced me through my debate career are , Daryl Burch, Moselle Burke, Roger Nix and Richard Davis. take it however you want to.
Beth Nibberich
Boston International Newcomers Academy
9 rounds
None
Lorenis Nova
Boston International Newcomers Academy
9 rounds
None
Aisosa Omere
Hire
9 rounds
None
David Park
Hire
9 rounds
None
Pranay Patil
Hire
9 rounds
None
Alvaro Peters
Hire
9 rounds
None
Benjamin Peters
Margarita Muniz Academy
9 rounds
None
Kenvi Phillips
Hire
9 rounds
None
Jessie Pontes
New Mission - BCLA - ACC
9 rounds
Last changed on
Mon February 6, 2023 at 4:12 PM EDT
Email @jessiepontes1@gmail.com
AFF: run whatever you like. I've ran K AFFS and policy stuff. The aff has a burden of proving that the resolution is a good idea so prove to me why I should vote for you. It's simple really, I just go on a daily explanation of why my solvency mechanism makes sense instead of giving way too many advantages and never explaining them.
K’s: :) don’t screw it up <3
FW: If your running it, I hope you stick with it but you can show me otherwise.
DA: give me a good link story and impact calc. don't make me do work on the impact calc. I need to here a real clear reason on why they trigger imp. if it's not explained then i probably won't evaluate it.
CP: sure go for it. Give me a reason on why the CP is a feasible solution to either solve the aff and the "disad(s)".
Speaks: speed, idc but i need to hear a tag and author. I'm super lenient w/ speaks because everyone has a different style
Gema Recio-Luciano
Boston International Newcomers Academy
9 rounds
None
Cristina Rodrigues
Hire
None
Raulina Rodriguez Tejera
Boston International Newcomers Academy
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat January 27, 2024 at 4:51 AM EDT
Español
Fui debatiente de la escuela secundaria por 3 años, y ahora soy parte de la comunidad de exalumnos de la Liga de Debate de Boston. Desde mi graduación de la escuela secundaria, comencé a ayudar como juez de la Liga de Debate de Boston durante las competencias, especialmente para la división en español. En la actualidad soy entrenadora de debate en español y trabajo como para-profesional para las escuelas públicas de Boston.
Puntos clave:
Estilo: Entiendo que como debatientes, podemos desarrollar diferentes estilos de debate. Como ex-debatiente soy considerada en ello y acepto diferentes estilos que pueden ser brindados, siempre y cuando los estilos utilizados sean bien ejecutado.
Velocidad: la velocidad utilizada durante una ronda de debate debe ayudar a que sus argumentos sean claro y comprensibles. También debe ayudarte a ser más persuasivo a la hora de presentar tus argumentos.
Actuación: cuando se trata de la actuación de los debatientes, siempre que sea profesional y muestren respecto, será bien aceptado.
Nota sobre la tecnología: Entiendo que debido a este nuevo formato de debate. Es posible que experimentemos algunas dificultades técnicas. En caso de que ocurra alguna dificultad técnica, yo sería muy flexible con el tiempo de cada equipo y con el tiempo de las rondas de debate.
Intercambio de pruebas: si un equipo aporta pruebas adicionales, espero que sea compartida con el otro equipo y el juez.
No tolero palabras/acciones racistas, sexistas, etc. durante la ronda de debate. En caso de que suceda, descartaré la ronda de debate de inmediato. Especialmente, si se hacen de manera intencional.
English
I was a high school debate for three years, and now I become part of the Boston Debate League alum community. Since my high school graduation, I started assisting as a Judge for the Boston Debate League during competitions, especially for the Spanish division. Now, I work as a debate coach in the Spanish division and as a paraprofessional for Boston Public School.
Key points:
Style: I understand that, as debaters, we may develop different debate styles. I'm very open to accepting different debate styles during a debate round as long as the style is well-implemented.
Speed:Your speed should make your argument clear and understandable. It should also help you to be more persuasive when it comes to presenting your arguments.
Performance:When it comes to debaters' performance, As long as the debater is professional and respectful, it will be well accepted.
Note About Technology: I understand that because of this new debating format. We may experience some technical difficulties. I am flexible with the time if some technical difficulty happens.
Evidence Sharing:If one team brings additional evidence, I expect it to be shared with the other team and the judge.
I do not tolerate racist, sexist, etc. words/actions during the debate round. If it happens, I will dismiss the debate round immediately, especially if it was intentional.
Shantae Romain
Excel High School
9 rounds
None
Ashley Rosa
Brighton High School
9 rounds
None
Leritza Ruiz
Excel High School
9 rounds
None
Keeana Saxon
Hire
9 rounds
None
Cicily Shaw
Hire
9 rounds
None
Melanie Shumate
Hire
9 rounds
None
Ravi Singh
New Mission - BCLA - ACC
9 rounds
None
Ke'Anna Skipwith
Hire
9 rounds
None
James Soares
Charlestown High School
9 rounds
None
Aaron Spencer
Hire
9 rounds
None
Nicola Sumner
Mary Lyon High School
9 rounds
None
Emily Sundquist
Hire
9 rounds
None
Lezine Swan
Hire
9 rounds
None
Advait Tendulkar
Hire
9 rounds
None
Jodi Then
Boston Green Academy HS
9 rounds
None
Jeremy Thompson
Hire
9 rounds
None
Veronica Thompson
Hire
9 rounds
None
Brandon Tilghman
Hire
9 rounds
None
Matthew Trexler
New Mission - BCLA - ACC
9 rounds
None
Ramon Trinidad
Brighton High School
9 rounds
None
Sneha Walia
Boston Latin Academy HS
9 rounds
Last changed on
Fri January 16, 2015 at 7:01 AM EDT
My experience is in participating in and coaching high school extemp and public forum debate
I strongly prefer slower, articulate speaking to spreading
I strongly prefer clear signposting of evidence and major points
I strongly prefer that competitors stand during speeches and crossfire
Gabrielle Webb
Hire
9 rounds
None
Emily Weiss
Neighborhood House Charter School
9 rounds
None
Michelle Williams
Hire
9 rounds
None
Erica Wilson
Boston Green Academy HS
9 rounds
None
Curtis Wu
Prospect Hill Academy Charter School
9 rounds
Last changed on
Sat December 10, 2022 at 2:34 AM EDT
I coached policy debate between 2019-2022 at Prospect Hill Academy, a Boston Debate League school. I debated LD many years ago in high school, mostly lay debate with some national circuit experience on the West Coast.
I do my best not to intervene as a judge and make a decision based solely on the arguments and evidence presented in the round.
Theory/Topicality - I am not confident in my ability to evaluate theory. Run it at your own risk.
Plans/Counterplans/Disads - I have become more comfortable with these style of arguments since I've started coaching. Make sure that links and solvency impacts are super clear and weighed.
Kritiks - I think there's a valuable space for these in debate. Again, establishing a clear link is key if you are making this argument
Overall, I want a clear story and crystallization in rebuttals in which you choose the most strategic issues (whatever that means to you) rather than trying to win everything via spreading