Mounds Speech Tournament
2020
—
Mounds,
OK/US
LD/PF Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Cheyann Benn
Haskell High School
8 rounds
None
Eddie Blackmon
Haskell High School
8 rounds
None
Sarah Eppinger
Mounds High School
None
Wyatt Freeman
Bristow High School
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 7:34 AM CDT
I am open to most any type of argumentation. I love kritiks, theory shells, topicalities, and all things squirrelly. That said, I believe spreading is an unethical practice and if I can't understand you enough to flow, you didn't say it. I have voted on probably 80% of speed Ks I have heard.
Hannah Grenier
Riverfied Day School
8 rounds
None
Nathan Hughes
Keys High School
Last changed on
Fri January 26, 2024 at 11:09 AM CDT
A brief background: I was a competitor for four years at Keys High School. I participated in Policy debate between 2009-2012 and along with my partner was the State Champion in the 4A Division in 2012. I have also medaled at State in Standard Oratory and Foreign Extemp. He/Him
Extemp: The most important thing to me is that your speech is constructed well; I will vote for a well-organized speech with sub-par delivery over a well-delivered speech that seems to be written haphazardly. Having a solid preview-> view -> review structure tends to help with this. I like it when speakers clearly tie the introductions to their speeches to the main topic they will be talking about, and give a satisfying conclusion after their review. Signposting with phrases like "Now, onto my second point..." helps make it clear which of your points you are talking about. I also like it when speakers make a clear distinction between information that is cited evidence and information is their own analysis. Please tell me if you want your time signals going up (I show you how many minutes you have used) or going down (I show you how many minutes you have left).
CX: I lean towards being a Policymaker judge, meaning I look at the world both teams present to me and vote for the world I would more like to live in. That being said, I vote for what I see in the round and I like it when teams tell me the issues I should be voting on in the rebuttals. I don't handle spreading as well as some other judges and prefer it if speakers slow down at least for the slugs and citations on their cards. Brief roadmaps and good signposting (e.g. "Now, onto the topicality...") helps me flow and will make it much easier to vote for you. I appreciate it when arguments are well-organized and clear to understand. I am open to kritikal and theory-based arguments but will find it easier to vote for these things if you do a good job of convincing me why I should vote for them in your rebuttal speeches.
LD and other debate formats I am less familiar with but still appreciate when competitors clearly line out voting issues and give me solid reasons to vote for them in their rebuttal speeches.
Feel free to ask if you have any specific questions before the round. Competing is tough under normal circumstances and is made even more frustrating when having to deal with technology-based issues. Good luck!
Angela Johnson
Okmulgee High School
None
Jessica Matthews
Keys High School
Last changed on
Wed April 17, 2024 at 7:16 AM CDT
I am a policy coach at heart with a stock issues/policy maker blend paradigm. I love on case (stock issues) clash in the 2NC. I don't like Ks, but if they link and the alt can't be permed, let's go. T arguments acceptable. Please do not cry abuse and then run 3 DAs. Either it is abusive and you couldn't prepare or the T needs a new voter. For other styles of debate, down the flow attacks and answers are always fun. Be calm, cool, and competitive.
Ashlee Overall
Mannford High School
None
Penelope Oyler
Mannford High School
I absolutely cannot judge spreading. My brain does not absorb argument that fast, so slow down for the old folks.
CX
I do not have a great deal of experience with CX so an emphasis on tag lines helps.
I understand better when you explain the harms and solvency of your plan. Same goes for counter-plan.
I appreciate debate on topicality, but please don't waste a great deal of time there...especially on repetitive argument.
LD
I clearly want to see that the debate is concerning a moral issue- not one of policy. Do argue value and criterion. Credibility of sources may outweigh more recent dates. Do not get sucked into your opponents spreading by thinking you have to address every argument he/she brought up...I probably didn't understand them all anyway. You will win more points from me by adhering to my request for reasonable speed.
PF
Convince me.
Braden Salazar
Muldrow High School
None
Cherie Serre
Prague High School
None
Cloe Serre
Prague High School
None
Amy White
Muldrow High School
None