CRDL Tournament 3 at California Middle School
2020
—
Sacramento,
CA/US
MSPDP Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Last changed on
Fri February 23, 2024 at 5:45 AM PDT
I am a lay judge. Quality>Quantity. Weigh the debate, and please do not spread.
I look forward to judging you!
Ramesh Chellapilla
Folsom Middle School
None
Last changed on
Wed December 8, 2021 at 11:15 AM PDT
Parent judge. Elementary School Teacher. Please do not speed read your case. I am unfamiliar with many technical terms in debate. New to high school debate and times and format. Let's all keep time so we follow the rules.
I value arguments supported with evidence and impacts. Make sure you weigh the key arguments at the end of the debate and tell me why your arguments are stronger.
Last changed on
Fri October 1, 2021 at 5:40 AM PDT
I am a lay judge. If you make everything clear to me and speak at an appropriate pace, I will vote for you. Please have organized speeches, so I can make sure to catch all of your arguments and evidence. Please weigh in last speech, and make it easy for me to vote for someone. Most importantly, please be respectful to each other and have fun!
Raghavan Rajagopalan
Folsom Sutter Middle
Last changed on
Thu January 25, 2024 at 5:07 AM PDT
Hello all! I am a lay judge.
Please speak slowly and clearly.
I am not completely familiar with all the debate terms. Please explain what each one is in a short description when you use them
Good luck!
Kumari Rashmi
Folsom Sutter Middle
Last changed on
Sat April 13, 2024 at 12:45 AM PDT
I am a Parent judge. My notes focus on (1) argumentation, (2) supporting evidence. I highly value credible evidence.
Most of all, I appreciate a respectful and fun debate!
Ramesh Rathinam
Folsom Sutter Middle
None
Kanishk Vankayala
Churchill
Last changed on
Sat April 13, 2024 at 5:00 PM EDT
I am not a lay judge.
I am a pf debater some policy experience, I can evaluate progress args but am not the best at it.
Please send speech docs to kanishk1031@gmail.com
Harinath Vasalamarri
Folsom Sutter Middle
Last changed on
Sat February 13, 2021 at 11:39 AM PDT
Weighing and spelling out to me as a judge why your arguments are more important than your opponents is significant and holds worth for the outcome.
It would be much preferred if each speaker spoke clearly and at a slower pace. The faster the pace, the harder it gets to process everything of significance, therefore, speaking slower has more advantages. However, I do not mind if the pace is still slightly fast.
I expect a clean, respectful round where both teams hold true to being mindful of their attitude and tone. While I love to see clash in a round, I hope that nothing gets too aggressive. I like to see strong arguments thoroughly presented with evidence that backs them up.