CBSR IE and LD 2
2019
—
Redlands,
CA/US
All Tournament Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Last changed on
Sat October 17, 2020 at 4:25 AM PDT
Clear logical arguments based on evidence.
As a second-year judge, I want to understand your logic and evidence. If I can't understand what you say, I can't award you points. Though I understand speaking fast (spreading) is sometimes necessary, by the end of the debate I will judge based on what I understood. If I don't follow you, you may lose. Overstating your case also loses points with me (in other words, "x is unlikely and so many people will suffer" convinces me a lot more than "x will never happen and so the entire world will suffer and die").
I don't appreciate frivolous theory or too much theory. If you can show me why your opponent is being unfair in debating, that helps me judge. Otherwise running theory will probably lose you the debate.
Jonathan Budner
Claremont
None
Last changed on
Fri February 10, 2023 at 1:21 AM PDT
To make things clear, I am a lay judge in progressive debate. Make theory and progressive tools (i.e. kritiks/counterplans) very, very clear.
The Affirmative must present a problem with the way things are right now. Their advocacy must reasonably solve that problem. The advantages of doing the advocacy must outweigh the disadvantages of following the advocacy. You don't have to have a USFG plan, but you must advocate for something.
Speed: Be clear. Be very clear. Do not spread. Slow down for analytics. If you are comparing or making analytical arguments that I need to understand, slow down for it. I want to hear the warrants in the evidence. Be clear when reading evidence. I don't read cards after the round if I don't understand them during the round.
Theory: Make it make sense. I'll vote on it if it is reasonable. Please tell me how it functions and how I should evaluate it. The most important thing about theory for me is to make it make sense. I would like for the debates about the debate to be interesting. I am not into frivolous theory. If you like running frivolous theory, I am not the best judge for you.
Evidence: Don't take it out of context. I do ask for cites. Cites should be readily available. Don't cut evidence in an unclear or sloppy manner. Cut evidence ethically. Do not take evidence out of context by cutting qualifiers like "might" or "maybe". Don't assume that I am familiar with the specifics of a lit base. Please break things down to me. I need to hear and understand warrants. Make it simple for me. The more simple the story, the more likely that I'll understand it. I won't outright reject anything unless it is blatantly racist, sexist, homophobic.
Sajeed Chowdhury
Los Osos HS
Last changed on
Sat December 5, 2020 at 3:51 AM PDT
I'm a parent judge and so I have very basic but specific guidelines:
1. Share an outline or roadmap at the beginning that is not only clear but that you follow in your presentation (If it does not flow, I cannot follow).
2. Speak at a moderate pace so that it is easy to follow and understand.
3. Following speaker etiquette is important. While I may not vote down a debater for rudeness or lack of etiquette, it will affect their speaker points.
4. Strongly prefer traditional debates so please do not use progressive tactics (e.g., no spreading, no kritiks).
5. During cross fires, please do not ask questions for questions sake... recommend that you take advantage of the opportunity to ask probing questions to either clarify a point or expose a flaw in your opponents statements.
6. (For LD) Aff has a burden to show the resolution is, generally speaking, a true statement. Neg has the burden to show it is a false statement.
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM PDT
I have judged Varsity Policy, Parli and LD debate rounds and IE rounds for 10 years at both the high school and college tournament level. I competed at San Francisco State University in debate and IEs and went to Nationals twice, and I also competed at North Hollywood High School.
Make it a clean debate. Keep the thinking as linear as possible.
Counterplans should be well thought out – and original. (Plan-Inclusive Counterplans are seriously problematic.)
Speed is not an issue with me as usually I can flow when someone spreads.
I do like theory arguments but not arguments that are way, way out there and have no basis in fact or applicability.
Going offcase with non-traditional arguments is fine as long as such arguments are explained.
Above all, have fun.
Diana Garibay
Redlands HS
None
Last changed on
Sat January 18, 2020 at 7:42 AM PDT
Flowy debate judge. Values concise and orderly substantive clash (on warrants, links, and impacts), good time management, consistent strategy, effective use of cross ex, and signposting. Mostly tabula rasa but dings for gross fantasy and adds points for good argumentative use of accurate knowledge of real world. No speaks given for extensive use of debate jargon. Spreading fine as long as the diction is crystalline.
Tara Ho
Cajon High School
None
Wingchiu Henry Ho
Cajon High School
None
Alan Jackson
Cajon High School
None
Last changed on
Sun January 5, 2020 at 10:51 AM PDT
I am a parent judge. I have debated in LD when I was in High School over 25 years ago. 2 years ago I have reacquainted myself with debate when my son started competing. So with this being said, I am comfortable with all types of debate however I am not super familiar with all the arguments that currently popular. Assume my understanding at your own risk. What you will get from me is an independent judge that is flow-based. I will base my decision on how articulate your arguments are and if you adequately addressed your opponents key arguments.
I can handle moderate spread, but NOT if you're incomprehensible...and most of you are NOT understandable.
In terms of decisions, I try to make my decisions based on the flow, but will reward debaters for being smart and articulate. Additionally, although I will base my decision on the flow of arguments, I do NOT appreciate any show of disrespect to other competitors, spectators, and judges. I cannot guarantee that it doesn't affect my decision or assignment of speaker points.
School affiliations: Redlands High School,Los Gatos High School, Leigh High School
Victoria Kirkpatrick
Cajon High School
None
Anaely Lugo
Cajon High School
None
Diana Martinez Garcia
Cajon High School
None
David McNott
Claremont
None
Rosemary Miller
Carter HS
None
Stephanie Muravchik
Claremont
None
Lupe Olive
Carter HS
None
Orlando Salinas de la Rosa
Cajon High School
None
Satish Sankaran
Redlands HS
None
Brijesh Shrivastav
Redlands HS
None
Lina Tang
Santiago High School
None
Paulla Tilton
Santiago High School
None
Melinda Warren
Claremont
None
Last changed on
Thu October 15, 2020 at 1:59 PM PDT
I have 6+ years of experience judging at many local tournaments, CHSSA and NSDA Nationals. Have judged all events (congress, all forms of debate, all forms of IE). I value both content and style. Do not particularly appreciate spreading.
Ling Zhang
Redlands HS
None
Liuzong Zhou
Los Osos HS
None