Senior Vice President at Major Financial Institution. I mostly judge LD but started judging PF.

TL;DR:

· Don’t be sketchy (as debaters or as people). If you spread, it won't flow.

The Long Version:

1. Framework/Narrative: Make clear compelling and warranted arguments. Present cohesive story.

2. Argumentation: Most of this is standard. If you feel important for me to evaluate that your opponent did not respond to your arguments then say it in your speech.

3. Evidence: Having evidence ethics is a thing.

4. A Final Note: Respect your teammate and opponents. Use proper tone. Additionally, I appreciate wit and you will probably earn higher speaks on average if you are able to use humor effectively.

I am a parent and a lay judge​. That being said, I'm only familiar with traditional LD.

If you're a strict circuit debater, please strike me or plan on going lay. ​As far as traditional debate goes:

Things I like:

● Weighing your impacts clearly

● Full extensions - Tell me why what you're extending matters.

● Structured speeches/Signposting

Things I dislike:

● Being abusive in CX/aggressive in general

● Definitions debate - You can go for it, but don't expect to wow me

● Spreading

● Being late to the round

General:

● The obvious: don't be racist, homophobic, etc.

● I will disclose, but will keep it brief.. There'll be more comments in the e-ballot.

● I try to average a 28 in speaker points. I’d say clear rebuttals are the best way to up your speaks.

If you have questions, please ask me before the round starts.