Last changed on
Sat September 21, 2019 at 6:55 AM EDT
Background
I never competed in debate either in high school or college. I graduated from Brown University with a degree in economics and from Boston College Law School with my doctorate. After practicing law I went back to get my masters degree in education and became a professor. My son is currently a junior competing in PF. Although I’m a parent judge, I’m not new to argumentation.
Debate Preferences
I would consider myself a flay judge. While I will flow both sides of the debate, I don’t want to have to intervene in order to come to a decision. Always warrant your arguments. If you use logic and rhetoric to explain something, be sure to warrant it. Always weigh your arguments starting in summary if you want me to vote for your ballot. I’m going to expect frontlines starting in second rebuttal. If you are unable to quantify your impact, I won’t be able to weigh your arguments effectively. Ideally, I shouldn’t need to put in additional work off the flow to vote one team over another.
Speed
If you spread you will be voted down. PF is a debate event, not a how fast you can read event. If I stop flowing than you know you’re going too fast.
Pet Peeves
-Please signpost. If you want high speaks, than always tell me where you are on the flow.
-Don’t use foul language. This has never been a problem, but it needs to be mentioned.
-If this is the first round of a tournament, it’s likely I don’t know the topic as well as you will. Please explain your acronyms if it’s the first round, even if it means having to do it off the clock.
-I won’t keep track of your prep time. That’s not my problem unless a team accuses the other of abusing prep.
Evidence
Pretty simple, follow the NSDA rules and read the last name and year of publication. No need to list the authors credentials, I don’t care unless the source is disreputable. It is up to the opposition to point out if evidence is misconstrued. If the evidence is misconstrued, depending on the severity I will either cross it off the flow or vote down the team using the evidence. I won’t look at evidence unless both teams cite cards that contradict each other, at which point I will decide which team wins the card.
TL:DR
Please remember to have fun! Debate is all about learning, and if you’re not having fun there’s no point in debating.