I like flow debate, jargon is fine with me but if it's PF remember that it's supposed to be for the average individual to watch, so keep it minimal.

If you're running a K in LD you're really going to have to sell me on it, I'm not the biggest fan. If you run a K in PF it's going to be very difficult for you to pick up my ballot, but not impossible. I don't believe Ks capture the spirit of Public Forum debate, but if you have a legitimate K I'm not closed to the idea.

Like I said earlier, I like flow debate, meaning I like a lot of clash with your opponent's arguments. Evidence analysis is always a good thing, analyze their evidence for me. I enjoy being persuaded as well. With me, do your own style of debate, I'm probably going to appreciate that more than if you read this paradigm and try to debate with a different style. Not to say I don't think competitors can alter their style to meet specific judges, I just enjoy seeing debaters at their best.