I don’t have any expectations on what will happen in the round, so I tend to vote directly on the flow. Also, I recommend that you assume that I don't know anything about any of your case so explain it well or don't argue when I vote you down. I am fine with both policy and K's so it doesn't matter to me. I did debate for 6 years, varsity for three years.

Do you and you will be fine, as will I.

Don't go for Racism or Anti-blackness Good, FYI.

Email:davmac98@gmail.com. Do put me on the email chain and email me any questions, concerns o complaints.

Debate Background: Policy Debate for ICW (2012-2016, TOC Qualifier 2015 & 2016) and Harvard (2016-2017)

Coaching/Judging Background: Policy (Boston Debate League 2016-2020, ICW 2017, GBN 2018-2019, University of Iowa 2019-2020) and Public Forum (National High School Debate League of China 2017 & 2020)

POLICY PARADIGM

You do you. That being said, I am much more familiar with policy arguments than critical arguments. Good, warranted analytics are much better than bad, underhighlighted cards. Tech determines truth. Limited topic knowledge.

PUBLIC FORUM PARADIGM

Given my background, the most persuasive arguments often draw on a few strong pieces of evidence. Weighing in summary and final focus determines who wins. I don't flow crossfire.