Sequoyah Autumn Argument
2016
—
Canton,
GA/US
Speech Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Abigail Abel
McIntosh HS
None
Christina Bennett
Starrs Mill High School
None
Jill Bowen
North Hall High School Speech and Debate
None
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 2:20 AM CDT
I am a former high school debater that has dabbled in everything. I’ve been judging for the past six years and have judged everything, but policy. I recently graduated with a degree in Anthropology, with a focus on cultural anthropology. I’m a pretty typical PF judge and will vote for the team with the most compelling argument, however, I do like a solid framework. As far as cross goes, I don’t care if you sit or stand—whatever is most comfortable for you works for me. I don’t like when you address me during cross because I feel like you should be focused on your opponents instead. My BIGGIE is DO NOT SPREAD. If you are going too fast, I will not flow the round and drop you. This is PF, not policy. I have an extensive speech background and will be pretty merciless when it comes to speaker points. Other than that, remember to be respectful during the debate. Things can get pretty heated sometimes, but that is no excuse for rudeness. If you say things during the round that that are sexist, racist, homophobic, etc., I will drop you immediately. Let’s be kind to one another and remember to have fun! I look forward to hearing some good debates!
Mary Jo Bryan
Henry W. Grady
None
Mark Chabot
Lambert HS
None
St. Julian Cox
Grovetown HS
Last changed on
Sat November 10, 2018 at 5:23 AM EDT
I have experience debating Public Forum, and I've judged primarily PF and LD for the past two years.
In terms of speed, I have no issue with spreading so long as you enunciate your words. I can't judge what's incomprehensible.
During crossfire, the education of the round is severely limited if it is just used by a side to list off their contention without allowing for questions. Keep it to question and answer. There is a difference between fully explaining what was asked and running the clock down.
Blake Duncan
Carrollton
None
Ruth Ebbs
RW Johnson High School
None
Last changed on
Thu March 8, 2018 at 6:40 AM EDT
History: Former high school debate on the Georgia circuit. Saw decent success in PF for GFCA and Extemp for GHSA.
Judging PF:
Rhetoric
I'm a firm believer in appealing to the lay person but embrace the move towards a faster paced, evidence-guided style with fewer of the rhetorical techniques that you'd expect to see in a public forum or appeal. Speed, evidence, and coverage wins rounds, knowledge and rhetorical appeals win speaker points.
Speed
Speed doesn't matter. Clarity does.
Crossfire
I do not flow crossfire. If you say something in crossfire you want to be on the flow, bring it up in the next speech. Be respectful, yelling and rudeness will cost you speaker points.
Arguments
I expect to see a lot of arguments in opening and after that I expect to see the main ones you're running with, whether you call them voters or not. Calling them voters or whatever you do to make them perfectly obvious makes them easier for me to notice and weigh. I'm a flow judge, but making arguments clear wins rhetorically. Whatever voters you're running with need to be there in every speech otherwise they're dropped. If you want me to weigh arguments through a particular framework, you better bring it up in constructive or rebuttal and continue it through summary and final focus
Decision
My RFD depends upon those arguments or voters that you make perfectly clear and support throughout your round. The most standing and heaviest offense (impacts) at the end of the round wins. Scoring offensive points wins, but don't forget to defend.
David Gay
Dunwoody High
None
Catherine Goins
Starrs Mill High School
None
John Golden
Archer High School
Last changed on
Thu December 30, 2021 at 4:03 PM EDT
I am an economist and a policymaker, so I am most swayed by evidence that the arguments or plans proposed will do the greatest good to achieve the aims you propose. I am not tabula rasa. I base my evaluation of your arguments on whether they are factual as well as how well your logic is tied to your conclusions. One thing I have seen from a lot of students is a propensity to make as many arguments as possible to win on weight. In general, I have found that most debates I have judged tend to come down to a few major arguments rather than the sum of the two arguments. Often, if your most important effects really matter, I don't care about minor ones. Still include them because they may help win a close debate but know that a small increase in the price of oil will not beat nuclear war in a head to head comparison.
Most importantly, have fun!
Mario Herrera
Henry W. Grady
Last changed on
Sun February 18, 2024 at 6:58 AM EDT
Congressional Debate:
I have judged and/or been parliamentarian at local, regional and national tournaments, including Isidore Newman, Durham Academy, the Barkley Forum and and Harvard. My students have found success at both the national and state levels.
POs- I default to you. Remember, your tone as PO has a big influence on tone of the chamber. Be efficient, clear and consistent and have fun.
As far as the round and debate within the round, consistency is important to me. The way you speak and vote on one piece of legislation should most indeed influence your position on similar limitation unless you tell me otherwise. Debate and discourse does not exist in a vacuum.
Acting/characterization is fine as long as there is a reason and has a positive impact.
Finding a balance of logos, ethos and pathos is important. Difficult to accomplish in three minutes? Absolutely. The balance is what gets my attention.
I'll be honest. I don't like when debate jargon leaks into the chamber. SQUO, affirmative/negative, counterplan, link/turn, etc. This event is it's own unique event with norms.
Additionally, Student Congress is not Extemp-lite. If you are trying for three points in a speech, how do I know what to focus on? If everything is equally important then nothing is important. Take a stance, go for the impact and make the balance between logic and emotional to persuade. Include previous debate points, elucidate your point of view and have fun.
Leeanne Kline
Cherokee High School
None
Robert Knurek
Archer High School
Last changed on
Fri October 22, 2021 at 12:19 PM EDT
Speed: Do not lose clarity for quantity.
Substantive arguments should be well supported, organization helps the flow. My background is a history/philosophy/psychology/forensics teacher and debate coach. It is important to stay on topic, be concise and to directly address the resolution/topic.
Leah Kurtz
North Cobb HS
None
Susie Lazega
Henry W. Grady
None
Alan Livsey
Starrs Mill High School
None
Sherry McKinney
RW Johnson High School
None
Jonathan Newman
The Lovett School
None
Paul O'Keefe
Hillgrove
None
Charles Olsen
RW Johnson High School
None
Liz Opsahl
Henry W. Grady
None
Mary Peterson
Cherokee High School
Last changed on
Thu May 17, 2018 at 3:46 PM EDT
I am actually a Speech judge so I will be looking for proper syntax and good delivery. I will weigh arguments with ethos and pathos heavier. Please do not spread or I will deduct points.
Joe Ruvo
Dunwoody High
None
JanMarie Schell
Paulding County High School
None
Rebecca Todd
Grovetown HS
None
Nandini Topiwala
George Walton Comprehensive
None
Mary Kay Waterman
The Lovett School
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 10:15 AM EDT
I coach PF Debate and have judged LD for 15+ years. I love to see professionalism, real logic in cases and rebuttals, impeccable speaking skills, and good time management. Please avoid barraging me with questions about my expertise before the round starts.
“Off-time road maps” serve no purpose. Framework and observations are not just for show; I weigh them throughout the round. Spreading does not belong in PF or LD, and I will not flow arguments that I cannot hear.
Good argumentation matters the most to me. I should hear incisive warrants to support all claims. Your impacts should be specific and resonate throughout your contentions. Good debaters achieve turns and can group arguments well.
In regard to PF:
Summary speeches should, above all, situate the round and extend the rebuttal.
Try not to turn the round into just an “evidence-off”. Know when to move on from a dispute over one piece of evidence.
In the Final Focus, you must weigh arguments with specificity and effective persuasion, but the focus should be on the holistic argument and impacts, not line-by-line analysis at that point.
I don't give long-winded verbal feedback at the end of rounds, but I try to give an abundance of ballot comments for your benefit.