I do not like toxic or overly punitive styles of policy debate. When debaters attack each other as opposed to the arguments, I do not find that style influential. I dislike policy debates that rely on knowledge of the lexicon as opposed to the presentation of solid arguments. Basically, attacking the opponents ability to follow the esoteric nature of policy debate as opposed to having solid research is not influential. Speaking far too quickly for a judge to follow a plan or recitation of research is equally disconcerting. I encourage a deliberate pace with cited research, and a collegial manner of debate.