My full paradigm is on Tabroom and includes a detailed overview for each argument type, I would encourage you to read that. In short, you do you and if you do it well, you'll likely get my ballot. Run whatever you want as long as it isn't offensive (examples of offensive arguments: 'racism does not exist' or 'sexism good' or 'ableism inevitable'), just make sure you can justify whatever you are doing because I am open to debates about debate (ie theory, framework, and topicality). I enjoy creativity and a well-organized flow.

I am a coach of a team that competes on the national circuit. We typically run either critical (of both the PoMo and identity flavors) or middle ground strategies (ie critical twists on stock arguments), but I am familiar with traditional, policy-making strats from novice coaching. I also competed in NFA LD and NPDA/NPTE parli, so I have familiarity with running trad args as well.