I am a traditional judge for policy that holds the stock issues to be the most important. However, with theory and Kritik arguments, I think these can be used and presented well, but require more intention to carry the arguments through the whole round. Interrupting during CX is both important and rude, and must be done tastefully. I have coached in Montana, so we do more traditional out here. However, I have judged policy and PF at nationals before and have the ability to follow very fast paces argumentation if delivered well.