National Speech and Debate Tournament

2023 — Phoenix/Mesa, AZ/US

Adam Levanger Paradigm

Policy
Policy Debate Judge Philosophy

Your experience with Policy Debate (check all that apply)

Coach of a team

How many Policy rounds have you judged this year?

0-10

Which best describes your approach to judging Policy Debate?

Policymaker
 

RATE OF DELIVERY

2/91 = slow and deliberate
9 = very rapid
 

QUANTITY OF ARGUMENTS

2/91 = a few well-developed arguments
9 = the more arguments the better
 

COMMUNICATION AND ISSUES

5/91 = communication skills most important
9 = resolving substantive issues most important
 

TOPICALITY: I am willing to vote on topicality:

5/91 = often
9 = rarely
 

COUNTERPLANS

2/91 = acceptable
9 = unacceptable
 

GENERIC DISADVANTAGES

7/91 = acceptable
9 = unacceptable
 

CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE POSITIONS

8/91 = acceptable
9 = unacceptable
 

DEBATE THEORY ARGUMENTS

5/91 = acceptable
9 = unacceptable
 

CRITIQUE (KRITIK) ARGUMENTS

9/91 = acceptable
9 = unacceptable
Additional remarks: If you use speech drop or you have an email chain (adamlevanger@gmail.com), adamlevanger@gmail.com. My background: I have been involved in debate for a couple of years but am not an experienced or technical judge. I am a lay judge with a growing understanding of things...I almost know enough to be dangerous but sincerely try to stay in my lane. Clear sign-posting please. I will flow. I appreciate moderate speed but can deal with speed if I have access to the evidence. Aff: I think Policy Aff's make the most sense and have a harder time with K-Aff's, although I have voted for K's. I prefer a strong, easy to follow link chain. Please explain arguments and impacts clearly. I have a preference for realistic impacts, but if your links makes sense, go for it. Sign-post strongly for me please. Neg: Topicality/theory: Make sure you have a clear interpretation and violation and link strongly to why it's un-topical. Disadvantages: Prefer they link and have clear impacts. Counterplans: Prefer if mutually exclusive and can solve for Aff and Neg impacts. Kritiks: Not a huge fan. Thank you!

Note: if you wish for your pronouns to appear the debaters you judge on text/email blasts, log into Tabroom, click Profile at top, and add them in the Pronouns field.