Seattle University High School Speech and Debate Tournament
2022 — NSDA Campus, WA/US
Spar - how to
How to Spar –
The debaters will be assigned affirmative or negative until all debaters are assigned to a side by the judge prior to the start of the round. The speakers will have one minute before speaking to prep. The first affirmative speaker will give a two-minute speech in favor of the resolution; immediately after that speech, the first negative speaker will refute the position in a two-minute constructive. Following the opening statements, there will be a five-minute open cross-examination. The pair should question each other, and should be prepared to take at least a few questions from the audience, other competitors, and even the judge. Two rebuttal speeches of the affirmative and negative respectively (2 minutes each) complete the round. Judges should time and provide timing signals for the competitors.
Times: Aff-2; Neg-2; CX-5; Aff-2; Neg-2.
If an odd number of students show up for the round, one student may give a repeat (unscored) additional performance. Answers by debaters to questions from the audience during the open CX period should be used in the scoring of the competitors who are actually debating, but should not be considered as relevant in the scoring of those who are merely asking questions, particularly since some students may be double-entered and will not have the opportunity to participate in the questioning process.
The following is a sample ballot SIMILAR to what we will be using.
SPAR (Spontaneous Argumentation)
Judges: fill out every space in the form below. When ranking the speakers, award the rank of 1 to the best speaker, then 2nd, 3rd, etc. until every speaker has been ranked. Do not duplicate any ranks. Do not tie any contestants. Rate (also known as Speaker Points) are on a scale of 1-20 (20 being a flawless, amazing speech); 19-18 – Tremendous Speech; 17 – 16 Exceeds Expectations; 15 – Meets Expectations; 14-13 Below Expectation; 12 and below an inappropriate or deeply flawed speech.
Round: |
Rank the speaker: (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) |
Section: |
|
Contestant Name: |
|
Speaker Number: |
|
Topic: |
Rate the speaker: (20 – 1, 20 = best) |
Time: |
|
Judge’s Signature: |
|
Judge’s school affiliation (don’t abbreviate): |
Evaluate the speaker using the following criteria. Please offer justification for the ranking in the round and provide constructive suggestions to improve the student’s skills. Remember, both the student and their coach will see this ballot.
Criteria for Evaluation