Kamehameha Invitational Tournament
2018 — Honolulu, HI/US
Junior Varsity Policy
Event Description:
Description: Policy debate is a two-on-two debate where an affirmative team proposes a plan and the negative team argues why that plan should not be adopted. The topic for policy debate changes annually, so debaters throughout the course of a season will debate the same topic. One member of each team will perform the first constructive and first rebuttal speeches, whereas the other the second speeches. So, for example, the person who reads the 1st affirmative constructive will also perform the 1st affirmative rebuttal.
Policy debate involves the analysis of a policy-oriented question. In policy debate, emphasis is placed on well-researched arguments. It is necessary for the affirmative to advocate a plan by which the resolution can be affirmed. The affirmative team has the burden of proof. The negative team attacks this plan through various methods of their choice.
Note that the debate begins with the affirmative speaking first and then switches midway through the debate where the negative speaks first, thus giving the affirmative the ability to speak last.
Debate should emphasize clear communication. Debates must involve the denial or minimization of the opposition’s main arguments (i.e., clash). Competitors will not be rewarded if they make speeches that ignore their opponent’s arguments. Cross-examinations/crossfires should be used to clarify, challenge, and/or advance arguments. Arguments will be on clarity and comprehension. Competitors should display civility and professionalism throughout the debate.