BIBSC Speech Debate Championship
2025 — Guangzhou, CN
Congressional Debate
Event Description:
Purpose: Congressional Debate serves as a platform for students to develop advocacy and problem-
solving abilities while engaging in structured, research-based discussions about current events and
policy issues.
Legislation:A seasonal “docket” of legislation will be selected seasonally based on the needs of the
Network. Legislation will be chosen from student submissions and the duration of the docket chosen
annually.
A. Appropriate topics exhibit seriousness of purpose. The action proposed should be feasible, and
such that the actual United States Congress might debate it. Topics should be debatable, meaning
substantive argumentation exists on both sides. Legislation should be typed and double-spaced
with line numbers, not exceeding one page. Capitalizing the words “WHEREAS” and
“RESOLVED” in resolutions, and “SECTION” in bills, as well as inverse-indenting each clause or
section helps to distinguish between ideas and concepts.
B. Bills should have a national/domestic focus that the U.S. Congress would have jurisdiction over. A
bill establishes details behind how a particular law must work, including when it takes effect, how
much tax levy would be appropriated (if applicable), how infractions/violations will be dealt with,
etc. A bill may answer the who, what, when, where—and most specifically how—but it will never
answer “why. “Legislators explain rationale behind bills in their speeches, and how a bill
implements its solution can spark deeper, more meaningful debate.
C. D. Resolutions are simply position statements on issues Congress does not have jurisdiction over
(such as a foreign issue, although a bill can suggest foreign aid), or further action (such as
amending the Constitution). Resolutions lack the force of law, and never establish enforcement.
Templates for bills, resolutions, and resolutions to amend the Constitution are available online at
https://www.congressionaldebate.org/resources/legislation-templates.
Preliminary session:
A. Minimum of three hours.
B. 12-18 students as the optimum number for a three-hour session; otherwise, a session should
be lengthened by ten minutes per each additional student beyond 20. Chambers may not be
larger than 30 students.
C. D. Election of a presiding officer.
New seating chart (necessary accommodations for students with special needs may be
made).
E. F. G. Resetting of precedence/recency. See ‘Recognizing Speakers’ below.
New legislation that has not been debated in a previous session at that tournament.
Shall be adjudicated by a Parliamentarian and at least one Judge.
General Procedures: Students will follow parliamentary procedure to propose, debate, and amend
legislation. The procedures for Congressional Debate are inspired by and closely follow Robert's
Rules of Order, a widely recognized framework for structured and democratic deliberation.
1. All major voting (such as the main motion/legislation) which a congressperson’s constituents
should have a record of, shall be done with a counted vote.
2. Students should ask permission to leave and enter the chamber when it is in session (move a
personal privilege). However, do not interrupt a speaker who is addressing the chamber.
3. Time for debate per legislation item should last no more than one-third of a session’s floor
time.
Speeches introducing legislation: are allotted up to three minutes, followed by two minutes of
questioning by other delegates. A student author who wrote the legislation gets the privilege of
recognition (called authorship), regardless of precedence; otherwise the presiding officer may
recognize a “sponsor” from the chamber, provided this recognition follows the precedence guidelines
above. Regardless, this speech of introduction must be followed by two minutes of questions. Should
no student seek recognition for the authorship/sponsorship, the chamber will move to lay the
legislation on the table until such time that a student is prepared to introduce it. The first negative
speech must also be followed by two minutes of questions.
Following the first two speeches: the presiding officer will alternately recognize affirmative and
negative speakers, who will address the chamber for up to three minutes, followed by one minute of
questioning by other delegates. If no one wishes to oppose the preceding speaker, the presiding
officer may recognize a speaker upholding the same side. When no one seeks the floor for debate, the
presiding officer may ask the chamber if they are “ready for the question,” at which point, if there is no
objection, voting may commence on the legislation itself. There is no “minimum cycle” rule; however, if
debate gets “one-sided,” the chamber may decide to move the previous question.
1. In the event a student speaks on the wrong side called for by the presiding officer and the
error is not caught, the speaker shall be scored and the speech shall count in precedence, but
the speaker must be penalized at least three points for not paying close attention to the flow of
debate.
2. In the event a student speaks on an item of legislation not currently being debated, said
speech shall count in precedence, but zero points shall be awarded.
Presiding Officer:The presiding officer must be elected with a majority of the vote. If one candidate
does not receive a majority of votes, eliminate the candidate with the fewest votes and vote again. If
candidates are tied for the fewest number of votes, vote to determine which of the tied candidates
should remain in contention. Repeat this process until one candidate receives a majority of votes.
Secret balloting is used when voting for presiding officer.
Recognizing Speakers
A. When more than one speaker seeks the floor, the presiding officer must follow the
precedence/recency method:
1. First recognize students who have not spoken during the session.
2. Next recognize students who have spoken fewer times.
3. Then recognize students who spoke least recently.
B. If a tournament is not using preset recency, before recency is established, the presiding
officer should recognize speakers fairly and consistently. Before precedence is
established, the presiding officer should explain their recognition process and it must be
fair, consistent and justifiable.
C. During any session, precedence/recency should not reset, to ensure that all students in a
chamber have an equal opportunity to speak and receive evaluation from scorers. When
a new session begins, precedence/recency will be reset along with a new seating chart,
and election of a presiding officer.
Recognizing Questioners
A. The presiding officer fairly and equitably recognizes members to ask questions following
each speech. The presiding officer starts timing questioning periods when they have
recognized the first questioner, and keeps the clock running continuously until the time
has lapsed. There are two different questioning methods.
B. All tournaments will use Direct questioning: The presiding officer will open the floor for
questions following each speech. The presiding officer will recognize questioners for a
cross-examination period of no more than 30 seconds. Questioners will be chosen
CEHOS Office January 2025 11Title document
according to a separate questioning recency. Scorers will include answers to questions
when evaluating speeches.
Recognizing Motions
A. The presiding officer will pause briefly between speeches to recognize any motions from
the floor; however, they should not call for motions (at the beginning of a session, the
presiding officer should remind members to seek their attention between speeches).
Amendments must be presented to the presiding officer in writing with specific references to lines and
clauses that change. This must be done in advance of moving to amend.
The parliamentarian will recommend whether the amendment is “germane”—that is, it upholds the
original intent of the legislation—otherwise, it is considered “dilatory.” The title of the legislation may be
changed.
A. A legislator may move to amend between floor speeches. Once that motion is made, the
presiding officer will read the proposed amendment aloud and call for a second by one-
third of those members present, unless they rule it dilatory.
B. Should students wish to speak on the proposed amendment, the presiding officer will
recognize them as per the standing precedence and recency, and the speech will be
counted toward their totals, accordingly.
C. Simply proposing an amendment does not guarantee an “author/sponsor” speech, and
any speeches on amendments are followed by the normal one minute of questioning.
D. Amendments are considered neutral and do not constitute an affirmative or negative
speech on the original legislation.
E. If there are no speakers or the previous question is moved, the chamber may vote on a
proposed amendment without debating it.
Use of Evidence:
A. Visual aids are permitted in Congressional Debate, provided they do not require electronic
retrieval devices in the chamber.
B. All evidence used is subject to verification. Honesty and integrity are of utmost importance in
legislative debate. Falsification or deliberate misuse of evidence may result in the legislator being
suspended by tournament officials.
C. The use of internet enabled electronic devices is permitted. Students may not use the internet to
gain help from coaches, other students, or any person, such that it would prevent the speech
from being the original work of the competitor.