Judging Debate: I value a solid, well-articulated argument. I'm not impressed by speed. Although more evidence is better then less, if you don't articulate your positions (value/ contentions) well, all the evidence in the world won't help. In addition, you also have to be able to think on your feet (off book, that is not reading from your prepared text) especially in the X and Summary rounds.

For speech, I am an English teacher, so I look for the depth and interpretation of your piece. You need to speak well and articulate your presentation clearly. You must be passionate about what you speak. Every reading/ interpretation/ presentation should aim to move your audience.

I have been debating LD for three years and am a senior at State High. This is my first year judging. I am familiar with traditional LD debate and have little experience with circuit. I will be able to follow along if you speak fast. However, if you are planning on doing so, make sure that you are speaking at a REASONABLE speed and articulating enough that your opponent and I can understand you. If I can’t understand you, I will have no choice but to not count it.

I am familiar with most types of theory, and would prefer if you thoroughly explain your framework. If you drop arguments, I will not count them and will not allow you to address them again. In general, it’s just rude to do so. I prefer debaters with precise and clear impacts and weighing.

I also appreciate signposting and will allow off-time roadmaps.

I will start giving speaker points at 28. Needless to say, if you are rude to your opponent or me, or use offensive(racist, sexist, ableist, etc) language, I will take off points. Please be kind to one another.