Introduction:

Hello, My name is Neetu Agrawal. I am parent judge.

Debate are judged on variety of criteria:

Content: Is the debate informative, engaging and well-organized?

Delivery: Does the speaker present the debate effectively, using clear voice projection, appropriate gestures and eye contacts? Does the debater present their arguments clearly and persuasively?

Interpretation: Does the debater understand and convey the meaning of the debate?

Originality: Is the debate creative and unique?

Argumentation: Is the debater's argument logical and well-supported by evidence?

Refutation: Does the debater effectively address the opposing team's argument?

Knowledge: Does the debater demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic?

Fairness: Does the debater respect the opposite team and their arguments?

Respect: Judges and students should treat each other with respect, even when they disagree.

Please avoid speaking super fast. be clear. Thank you!!

I am a new recruit to debate judging. I will be taking notes about the different arguments you bring forth in the debate and will be carefully analyzing them to decide the winner. I will keep my own opinions out of the debate, I would like both debaters to please be respectful to one another during each round. Please keep your delivery slow and clear.

As a lay judge, I will flow. However, if you run theory, kritiks, topicality, or tricks, I won't evaluate them—you'll be wasting your time.

Please keep your arguments concise, clear, and focused. Address the points and concerns raised by your opponent directly. No spreading, and make sure to use facts to support your claims.

Common sense is the guiding principle here.

Hi! My name is Sanjana and I'm a senior at Quarry Lane on the PF team.

Please add me to the email chain: sanabajaj21@gmail.com

• Tech > Truth
• Speed: I'm comfortable with a fast pace as long as you're clear. Please signpost (moving to their case, on their first contention, etc.) and be organized in your speech
• Evidence: Send speech docs w/ cut cards for case and rebuttal
• Please collapse strategically on your own contentions as well as your responses to your opponent's case. The debate should ideally be narrowed down after each speech (quality > quantity!)
• Completely extend any piece of offense (UQ, links, impacts) & defense through summary AND final focus for it to be evaluated. No brand new arguments should be made in second summary or final focus.
• Make sure to frontline in second rebuttal/first summary
• Comparative weighing (link & impact) is super super important. Don't just restate your impacts, explain why they come first. I'll evaluate arguments with the strongest weighing first.
• Progressive arguments: I do have some experience debating theory (disclosure good & paraphrasing bad) and would try my best when judging these debates! Don't read any frivolous theory. I have very little experience w/ Ks so I wouldn't be the best judge for that.

Always be respectful to your opponents! And it should go without saying but don't read arguments that are racist, sexist, homophobic, etc, as those won't be evaluated.

Debate can be stressful but make sure to have fun :)

I have been judging LD debates for over four years, with occasional experience in Parli and PF formats. I prioritize clarity, substance, and respect in rounds. If any technical terms are used, please provide clear definitions. I value substantive contentions and points over intimidation or mockery. I flow during the round to track the arguments.

While I remain open-minded and impartial, I expect debaters to uphold the principles of sportsmanship and respect throughout the round. Mockery and intimidation have no place in constructive debate.

Impact calculus is highly appreciated as it helps in evaluating the significance of arguments.

Please include me (karthikakrishnna@gmail.com) in any email chains for reference. Best of luck to all debaters!"

If you need any further adjustments or clarifications, feel free to let me know!

I am a new recruit to debate judging. I will listen carefully to your arguments and keep my own opinions out of the debate. I decide who is the winner of the key arguments in the round. I write down the key arguments throughout the round. I would like both debaters to please be respectful to one another during each round.

I am a parent judge. Please speak slowly. No spreading or technical debate jargon.

(he/him)

I have been a judge for over 2 years.

The side that addresses everything on the flow will have an advantage on my ballot. In debate, I like to see strong clash and make sure to be clear with signposting. That will be easier on my flow.

Your speeches will appeal more to me when you’re calm and composed.

You’ll likely get more speaker points if you give a thoughtful and comprehensive response during cross because it shows that you are quick at thinking on your feet.

Make sure to warrant all your arguments and during your last speech, crystallize it for me and show why your side outweighs.

I've been judging for four years, and I focus on the key arguments that actually matter in the round. I care about well-explained arguments with solid warrants and clear impacts. Weighing is super important—help me understand why your argument matters more.

Speed is fine, but clarity is better. If I can’t understand you, I can’t flow you. A strong, confident delivery with good rhetoric goes a long way.

Debate should be a space for smart, respectful discussions. I don’t reward aggressive or dismissive behavior—keep it civil.

Signposting and good organization make my job easier. If I have to work too hard to follow your arguments, that’s on you.

At the end of the day, I vote on what happens in the round, so be clear, weigh well, and make my decision easy. Feel free to ask me any questions before we start!

I'm a parent judge and have limited experience with judging speech/debate. Please speak clearly and emphasize on the main points and evidences. I can't handle fast speed. I value speech quality and offer speaker points. As for PF, I like contestants that defend their cases well and raise questions/validations of their opponents' case.

4th year on the Circuit

add me to the email chain: kyle.du@student.quarrylane.org

tech > truth

send speechdocs for constructive and rebuttal before speech, helps me flow the round

second rebuttal should frontline offense and have defense

extend args you're going for in every speech; not in one speech = dropped

no new weighing in second FF, no new args/evidence in ffs

signpost for all of your speeches, offtime roadmaps are good too

interact with opponents' frontlines and rebuttals. don't just repeat your own args

solid time allocation, efficiency, clarity, enthusiasm = good speaks

weigh. tell me why you your impacts matter more, why I should vote for you

im okay withspeed. if you think you go too fast though please send me speechdocs

I don't really listen to cross, won't evaluate anything from cross unless it's brought up in a speech.

feel free to postround me -- I think it's educational and am more than happy to elaborate on any part of my decision.

not too familiar with theory and K's, run at your own risk

Hello!

Please add me to email chain if needed: irene.academic2027@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am a third year debater (2 semesters of Public Forum and current semester in policy) as well as fourth year speech (1 semester of impromptu, 3 semesters of DI, and 2 semesters of HI). I was nationally ranked in PF in middle school (MSTOC) as well as a TOC speech qualifier in 8th grade, and I debate with Quarry Lane/Christopher Thiele. My mom is a parent judge (Jingjing Pan).

Not much to say here - beyond general etiquette (which I WILL dock speaks if you are not being courteous and cannot read the room), just do the best you normally do, and I will judge based on your skill + clarity.

A few specifics:

- I'm tech > truth.

- For PF, please give me roadmap and overview/weighing as well as bring your point to me. If you have no idea what you're talking about/not educated about the topic, it's hard for me to see the "big picture" and even harder for me to give you the win in a round on a point or argument you won. I'm also not that familiar with the topic, which further means you should elaborate and be clear. Speaking fast is fine for me, spreading is NOT. Be sure you and your opponent reach consensus on speed, crossfire, email chains, etc.

- For Speech, be sure you are (or at least sound) excited about the point/story/idea you're delivering to me. A performance without soul would just be a lecture, which won't get you very far. Make your enunciation/movements clear if you choose to use gestures, and for blocking, I won't really consider it as a added bonus if you aren't making it REALLY clear what the action is (since I can have a hard time distinguishing). Remember to address your audience - a few interactions from time to time, if utilized right, can also be pleasant.

- For LD, Congress, Parli, etc. - Never done it before, but have a general sense of structure. Similar to everything I've said above, be clear and present your idea well, and the ballot will naturally fall.

Remember to have fun, play with forensics, and respect each other! :)

Email- deepna.abhishek@gmail.com

I am a mother of 3, and professionally, I am in Enterprise Tech Sales. My passion lies in dancing and traveling. I have a sophomore this year who loves Policy Debate, so I decided to help as a judge. I am looking forward to a great tournament today, with talented young minds who will show utmost professionalism and collaboration! Here are some of my Judging preferences:

Tech before truth. It's human nature to have preferences toward certain arguments but I try my best to listen and judge objectively. Unresolved debates are bad debates.

Speed is great, but clarity is even better. Less is more!

Be smart. I rather hear great analytical arguments than terrible cards.

I look forward to a great Debate and getting to know you!

I am a parent.

Be clear about your topic. Work on your final focus and summary.

Make sure to maintain consistent speed throughout your session.

Introduction:

Hello, my name is Pavan Katragadda. I have been involved in the world of speech and debate for over five years, serving as a parent judge. My journey in this field has been enriching and enlightening, and I am eager to continue learning and growing with each debate I judge.

Communication Style:

Clarity of speech is of utmost importance to me. I believe that the essence of a good debate lies not in the speed at which arguments are delivered, but in the articulation and structure of those arguments. Therefore, I encourage debaters to speak clearly and at a pace that allows me to follow their line of reasoning. If you choose to spread, please be aware that if I cannot follow your arguments, it may impact my evaluation.

Technical Terms:

While I am familiar with the general rules and format for most of the Debates, I may not be well-versed in all “technical” terms from the debating vocabulary. If you plan on using any such terms, I would appreciate it if you could explain them during your speech. This will ensure that I fully understand your argument and can evaluate it accurately.

Post-Round Process:

After the round has concluded, I like to take a few minutes to reflect on the arguments presented and enter my feedback and results. Please understand that this process takes time, and as such, I will not be able to disclose the results or provide judge’s feedback immediately after the round.

Expectations:

I expect all debaters to come prepared with strong arguments backed by solid evidence. A good debate is not just about winning or losing; it’s about learning, growing, and enjoying the process. So let’s have a fun and engaging debate!

Some things that I'm looking for as a parent judge, is strong points, confidence in your speeches, and good articulation skills. Overall, bring your best debating self!

for disclosure anupama.koneru@gmail.com

I am a parent Judge and excited to be part of this judging process.

I don't like spreading so be reasonable with speed. Don't have to go super, I am not super harsh with speaks but make sure speaking quality is listenable.

I enjoy debates with lots of clash.

I like more technical reasoning so make sure your evidence is good.

Weigh and Give me clear voters especially important in the 2AR.

Introduction:

Hello, my name is Aman Kumar. This is my first time judging any format of speech & debate however I have been involved in this world throughout my education. My journey in this field has been enriching and I am eager to continue learning and growing with each debate I judge.

Communication Style:

Clarity of speech is of utmost importance to me. I believe the essence of a good debate lies not in the speed at which arguments are delivered but in the articulation and structure of those arguments. Therefore, I encourage participants to speak clearly and at a pace that allows me to follow their line of reasoning even though they still must stay within the time limit. If you chose to speed, please be aware that if I cannot follow your arguments, it may impact your evaluation.

Technical Terms:

While I am familiar with the general rules and format for most of the debates, I may not be well-versed in all debate jargon. If you plan on using any such terms, I would appreciate if you could explain them during your speech. This will ensure that I fully understand your argument and can evaluate it precisely.

Post-Round Process:

After the round has concluded, I would like to take a few minutes to reflect on the arguments presented and enter my feedback & results. Please understand that this process takes time and as such I will not be able to disclose the results or provide any feedback immediately.

I am a parent judge. Please avoid speaking at your topmost speed. I value understanding your argument, so less is sometimes more

I prefer moderate speed. I vote for clear speaking and convincing arguments.

Hello, debaters, my name is Shreya. I have prior experience in policy debate, so I'm familiar with the intricacies of argumentation and debate structure. However, I am now a pf debater. I appreciate clear and slower speech, as it allows me to better understand and evaluate your arguments. Here are some key points to keep in mind when presenting your case:

1. Clarity and Speed:

   • Please speak clearly and at a manageable pace. Enunciate your words and avoid excessive speed, as it can hinder comprehension.
   • Signpost your arguments and use clear, structured language to present your ideas.

2. Argument Extensions:

   • I appreciate well-structured and logically extended arguments. Make sure to clearly extend and link your contentions and evidence.
   • Clearly explain how your arguments support your side's position and why they matter in the context of the debate.

3. Theory Arguments:

   • I am open to hearing theory arguments if they are well-explained and relevant to the round. Make sure to provide clear interpretations, standards, and voters.
   • Don't hesitate to engage with the opposing team's theory arguments and explain why they are or are not persuasive.

5. Evidence:

   • Provide strong and relevant evidence to support your claims. Explain the quality and relevance of your sources.
   • When using evidence, make sure to warrant it and show how it strengthens your position.

6. Cross-Examination:

   • Cross-examination is an essential part of debate. Effective questioning can clarify your arguments and undermine your opponent's case.
   • Use cross-examination time wisely to extract important information and expose weaknesses in your opponent's position.

8. Decision-Making:

   • I will base my decision on the arguments presented in the round, their quality, relevance, and how effectively they are extended.
   • Weigh the arguments, impacts, and framework to help me make an informed decision.

In summary, I'm a judge with debate experience who values clarity and well-extended arguments. Don't sacrifice clarity for speed, as anything I am not able to understand won't be given weight in my evaluation and may result in lower speaker points. Good luck, and I am excited to judge your debate!

amanda072086@gmail.com
Speak clearly. Any speed is fine as long as you slow down and read your tag lines and main points very clearly. Spreading is fine. Give clear indication of when you have reached the burden you set out.

LD: I am a true values debate judge in LD. Tabula rasa judge. Flexible to any kinds of cases and arguments as long as they are respectful. If your case is not topical or abusive and your opponent argues and proves that in their speeches then I am willing to vote based on topicality, education and abuse.

PF and CX: Be respectful and cordial to your opponent. I’m open to most anything in Policy rounds. Always stay on the debate topic, don’t wander off onto an irrelevant subject because it’s more enjoyable to argue about than the topic is. Always allow your opponent the opportunity to complete their sentence before continuing to cross.
I’m a Tabula rasa Judge especially in Policy debate. If you don’t tell me how you want me to weigh the round and set a minimum burden for each side to have to meet within the round to win then I will default to judging based on the block and will turn into a games playing judge and will make voting decisions based on what my flow shows and dropped arguments or arguments that were lost or conceded will very much factor into my vote. Impacts, Warrants and links need to be made very clear, and always show me the magnitude.

Raj Pattabi

I am a parent Judge and excited to be part of this judging process.

What and how I judge are as follows

• Assess the strength of arguments that includes the clarity of the thesis, quality of evidence, and logical coherence
• How well debaters respond to counterarguments and whether they maintain a logical and consistent position
• Consider the persuasiveness of debaters, presentation style, research and evidence
• Assess the debaters’ cross-examination skills, overall delivery and style

Please do not spread when speaking. If you want to spread, please share your case with me and your opponent.

Email: srr6915@gmail.com

Please weigh your impacts, and have clear arguments.

I am a parent judge, please explain your arguments properly and do not speak too fast. If I cannot understand an argument, I cannot vote for it.

Hi, I'm Mira! Below is some information about me as a judge:

Experience: I've competed in PF for 2 yrs and competed for one yr in Policy.

Argumentation: I place a strong emphasis on argument quality. I value well-reasoned, logically structured, and evidence-backed arguments.

Speaker Points: I'll award points based on clarity and articulation.

Speed: I can handle debates at a fast pace, but clarity and articulation must not be sacrificed for speed. I'll flow the debate to the best of my ability, but if I can't understand your argument due to speed or if it's unclear, it won't be given weight in my evaluation.

Role of the Ballot: My ballot ultimately goes to the team that persuades me of their position based on the evidence presented in the debate.

I'm a junior at Quarry Lane.

30 Speaks if you run a crazy contention

I have competed in PF for about 1.5 years and I've been to TOC Sophomore year.

I really respect the "public" aspect of debate. Though I am a flow judge, I do enjoy more thorough and comprehensive debates over jaw spasming to speak at 200 words per second. To put it simply: debate like you would for a flow judge, I'm not fine with spreading, I'm fine with theory, I will vote off the flow only, but do not go 200 wps.

I really, really do appreciate non-stock contentions. I will boost speaker points if you run a true non-stock contention.

Have fun debating. If you're a novice, take it light. Ease into the game, stick to the flow. No one cares what tournaments you win as novice, they care about what tournaments you win as Varsity. Play in the novice division not to win, but to learn. Also, if you are spreading in any novice division, I WILL DROP YOU. if you run theory in any novice division, that's kind of funny.

Never hesitate to ask questions after round. It is your job to ask questions and my job as a judge to help you to be a better debater in later divisions. Please do not include me in the email chain. I will only check evidence if a side asks me specifically to read it.

Last thing: Please dress formal, you won't show up to a basketball game wearing sweatpants and no shirt. Similarly, don't show up to the debate without looking presentable.

Email chain: yads139@gmail.com

I have 4 years of pf debate experience. My pronouns are he/him.

Please send a speech doc (with cut evidence, not just rhetoric) if possible.

General:

in round:

• I'll listen to cross; I don't understand why most tech judges don't; it's part of the activity for a reason. With that being said, I'll listen, but only vote off of what is said if you implicate it in a speech.
• defenseis sticky
• offense is not sticky
• extensions should have at minimum uniqueness, link and impacts; internal link extensions are nice too
• all args that you want me to vote on must be extended properly
• I won't evaluate args that are not extended through every speech (except first rebuttal)
• no new offense past rebuttals
• don't be abusive with new responses
• I understand the desire to do a bunch of prep and be a doc bot, but please interact with your opps case on a ev/warrant basis. It makes the debates more fun, makes weighing easier, and makes it so that I don't have to intervene.

weighing:

• Please don't say "we outweigh on magnitude, scope, probability." you need a comparative warrant for each mechanism.

• Weighing should start latest in summary; first rebuttal should be weighing.
• There should be no new weighing in final focus.
• Do not use probability weighing as a trojan horse to sneak in a new response.
• Prereqs/link-ins are a great way to make a debate fun.

Progressive arguments:

Run at your own risk! I'll vote off of theory/T, and I can understand some k's, but if yours is convoluted and/or spread I cannot guarantee I will. If you have a well constructed (and well-meaning) k or theory shell read it :)

Public Forum specifics:

• First speakers should ideally start weighing out of first rebuttal. Second speakers should weigh in second rebuttal (even if minimally).
• Please collapse on 1-2 args in summary. I have a high threshold for blippy arguments.
• Do not read the claim of a turn in rebuttal and expect to attach a warrant later on. I will only evaluate turns that are warranted, implicated and weighed out of rebuttal.
• You must go for the same arguments in summary/final focus.

LD specifics:

• Do not LD spread. I will not be able to understand what you are saying.
• Please talk slowly and clearly. Quality of arguments matters more than the quantity.
• I understand minimal circuit ld concepts. Be aware that reading a type of argument that is present in LD and PF may not translate to me.

I am a parent. Please speak clearly and slowly and avoid technical jargon. I value sound logic and reasoning. I don't value disrespectful language or tune. Please DO NOT bring up new points in the 2nd Rebuttal.

Please add me to email chain: Email: schirjeev@gmail.com

I am a lay judge. Go a little bit slower than you would usually just to make sure I get everything on the flow.

I am a parent judge. I expect you to demonstrate your knowledge and depth of the content as well as the ability to make a confident argument towards your stance.

I cannot judge what I cannot understand so clear and logical communication is key.

Also, keep track of your own and other team's speech/prep times.

Basically just be nice and enjoy your passion towards debate.

hi

Put me on the chain: frankyan53@gmail.com + quarrylaneyy@gmail.com AND debate@student.quarrylane.org

Hi, I'm Sam, a Junior at the Quarry Lane School. I've done PF debate for the past 5 years and I dabbled in Policy earlier this year.

Tech > Truth

I will be able to give a decent decision in Case/DA debates but will need more judge instruction with T, K, and complex CPs debates.

I am a parent judge, so please refrain from spreading too much. Thank you!