Judge Paradigm for Tabroom: Quality over Quantity

Dear debaters,

As a judge, I firmly believe in evaluating the quality of arguments rather than the sheer quantity presented. I value well-reasoned and logically sound arguments that are supported by evidence and analysis. While I respect different debate styles, it is important to note that I have a strong aversion to spreading. However, if spreading is your preferred debate style, I will not ask you to change it. Nevertheless, I must mention that I tend to scrutinize arguments delivered at a high speed due to the increased volume.

In terms of cross-examination, I appreciate a fast-paced and engaging exchange. However, it is crucial that you maintain respect for your opponents and refrain from being overly aggressive or disrespectful during this period. A healthy and intellectually stimulating cross-examination can enhance the overall quality of the debate.

To ensure that I can closely follow your arguments and properly evaluate them, I request to be included in the email chain. This will enable me to refer back to your evidence and review the content as needed, thus facilitating a more accurate assessment.

Ultimately, my primary focus as a judge is on the quality of your arguments, the strength of your evidence, and the coherence of your analysis. I will carefully consider the substance and logical coherence of your position, weighing it against that of your opponent. I like to see how points clearly connect to each other. Line-by-line rebuttals or big-picture are fine, but they must make sense.

It is also worth mentioning that I expect you to be the respectful and kind learners I know you to be. Any harmful or offensive language or behavior will not land favorably with me or the fate of your debate.

I wish you all the best in your debates, and I look forward to a thoughtful and engaging round.

Sincerely,

Gabriella Detrick