Last changed on
Mon February 5, 2024 at 6:51 AM CDT
I competed in Policy Debate in high school (grad. 2012) and competed at UIL State. I have been involved with Speech and Debate in varying capacities since then and have coached since 2022.
I value strategy, clash, and believe Policy Debate at its core is still a speaking event.
I would consider myself a “stock issues plus” judge. The stock issues matter to me in debate, but I have grown more interested in progressive styles of debate and will flow these arguments as long as you do the theory work and explain your arguments well. I will not connect any dots for you.
I don’t mind speed as long as you maintain clarity. If I feel you are unclear, I will stop flowing.
I don’t love voting on Topicality because, for most of my career, it has been used largely as a timesuck argument. However, this year, topicality is incredibly relevant. Carry your argument all the way through to get my vote on T.
I prefer highly technical DAs and will be looking for all of the ingredients. One of my most important voting issues will be impact calc!
If you run a CP, tell me why I should prefer your plan. I’m looking for Net Benefits/Mutual Exclusivity for you to win. Spell out how you solve better.
At the end of the day, my decision will be largely based on world comparison and impact calc. Tell me why you should win! Good luck!