Iowa Forensic League State Tournament
2021
—
NSDA Campus,
IA/US
Congress Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Ashley Armstrong
Hire
None
Charlea Fredstrom
Iowa City West
Last changed on
Sat January 23, 2021 at 11:07 AM EDT
As a former speech competitor, I expect professional, ethical, and effective communication. I am looking for good timing and persuasiveness; be as clear and concise as you can.
Danielle Hahami
Hire
None
Dale Kurth
Burlington Community High School
None
Neal Leeper
Theodore Roosevelt High School
Last changed on
Thu March 4, 2021 at 9:52 AM CDT
My name is Neal Leeper (he/him) and I am a retired engineer. I graduated from the United States Merchant Marine Academy and served as an officer in the US Navy Reserve for nine years. I worked for Mobil Oil (now Exxon/Mobil), Cummins Engine and John Deere. In my working career I served on several national and international committees that developed safety and environmental standards and regulations.
The purpose of debate is to develop your interpersonal speaking skills, logical and analytical reasoning, and presentation of facts that support your position. It’s important to listen to those who speak in opposition to understand other points of view. Equally important is to be respectful of all participants. These are skills that will serve you well in whatever career you choose to pursue.
Anna Payne
John F. Kennedy High School
Last changed on
Thu May 20, 2021 at 9:10 AM CDT
One of my favorite parts of Congressional debate is that it combines debate and public speaking aspects with the performance side of speech. Given the time limits we operate under, clear and concise speeches are important-cite your evidence, refute your opponents respectfully, and be sure to point out your impacts. Do not waste the chamber’s time with games that will run the clock down (yours or your opponent’s during questioning). It’s disrespectful and does not move the debate forward.
I am evaluating the full time in session, not just the 3-minute snippet of speeches: how are you working with (or against) your colleagues? How are you working together as a chamber to get legislation passed? Questions-both asked and answered-do count into my scoring.
The Presiding Officer is more than just a timekeeper. They set the pace, organization, and mood of a chamber. To be a new PO-or to be a PO at a high-level competition-can be a risk. Their effort is considered when I score. Point of order: There is no mathematical pattern as “random” selection for questioning.
Cheri Shatto
Okoboji Community School
Last changed on
Fri January 5, 2024 at 7:08 AM CDT
I am a fairly traditional judge but will listen to most any argument as long as it applies to the Resolution.
Please listen to your opponents arguments and have your rebuttal address their arguments.
I can listen to speed to a certain extent, but would rather not to have to tell you to slow down if I cannot hear the argument I cannot judge the argument.
I have coached and judged debate for 19 years.
I will not disclose in round unless told by the tournament to do so.
Tyler Stough
Johnston
8 rounds
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 4:32 AM CDT
PF - I have been judging PF for around 7 years now. I am a judge that listens for Impacts on why your Impacts outweigh others. I am not a huge fan of speed. I am more concerned with the content of the speech rather than the amount of information given. I do understand the PF jargon. It is up to you to persuade me to vote for your side. I am not a huge fan of using FW and definitions as a weighing mechanism but will consider it if the other arguments are well balanced. Make sure to clearly state your Impacts and how these impacts link to the resolution.
Congress - I am looking for you to know the Robert's Rules of Order as well as seeing you participating in the debate by asking questions. In terms of your speech, I would like to hear a clear structure for your speeches. I want to hear the impacts of your points and I want you to be very familiar with your speeches as well. Make sure to bring up new arguments when a bill has been debated for awhile. If you speak later in the session, I want to hear clash with other representatives/senators. I also want to hear new information if you are representing the same point as someone who has spoken previously. I also track recency so I will note if a PO may miss a recency order. Make sure to maintain your professionalism during cross and during your speech. I will knock down a speaker if I feel they are being too aggressive during their speech or their cross.
LD - I do not have much experience judging LD currently. Please focus on argumentation and impacts rather than the jargon that goes along with LD. Tricks, theory, etc. will not work with me. Also, speed is discouraged during your speeches. Please make sure I can follow your supporting evidence and arguments. I am familiar with PF and judging PF.
Last changed on
Tue February 2, 2021 at 4:55 AM CDT
I competed in 4 years of high school Congress and Public Forum, so I am a flow judge. However I also preference accessibility, no spreading, etc. Strong evidence is important on the flow.