Background:

I went to Nationals in PF twice, and have qualified to nats in extemp and congress. I have some experience in LD.

PF:

Framework- I am okay with framework and will flow it across ONLY if you tell me a)Why it matters and b)extend it in every speech. If you agree with their framework, don't just say, 'I agree' - turn it. If you have clashing framework, tell me why to prefer yours.

Speaks-I'd prefer it if you didn't spread simply because this isn't policy, but If you do, it must be clear. I cannot weigh your args If I don't know what they are. Please sign post, and slow down tags. keep your own time in prep+speeches

Argumentation: I will weigh the round on contention level debate. If an argument isn't extended, it's dropped. But, if you say, 'my opponents dropped...' that will not necessarily win you the round, explain why it matters. The First Summary must frontline, address the previous speech. If you don't tell me why the argument matters, I won't weigh it. And quantify your impacts-I need to know WHY this argument matters. Tech>Truth. Impact calc is always fun!

Progressive debate-I'd prefer if it was kept out of PF.

I won't really call for cards unless it was brought up throughout the round.

LD:

Same paradigm as PF, but, I have very minimal experience in LD. I'll keep up with anything as long as you clearly explain and weigh your arguments.

Progressive debate is fine, but don't assume I know the lit.

If there's an email chain, add me- abigailharrisl03@gmail.com

Good luck!!

PF debater for 2 years.

I will allow:

- File Sharing

- Time yourself

- Off-case arguments

Also Framework is obviously always important, but I do heavily focus on the contention level debate. You need to tell me how judge and give me numerical evidence or something to weight on. Also define things and the brinks in which they will happen. Keep things organized and easy to follow on the flow because I am a flow orientated judge. Make sure to extend your agruments of ill count it as if you dropped.