National Speech and Debate Tournament
2018 — Fort Lauderdale, FL/US
Kavita Persaud Paradigm
Your experience with LD Debate (check all that apply)Current LD coach
Experienced LD judge
Current Public Forum coach or judge
How many years have you judged LD debate?10
How many LD rounds have you judged this year?41+
What is your preferred rate of delivery?/91 = Slow conversational style
9 = Rapid conversation speed
Does the rate of delivery weigh heavily in your decision?
Will you vote against a student solely for exceeding your preferred speed?
How important is the criterion in making your decision?4
Do you feel that a value and criterion are required elements of a case?Y
Rebuttals and CrystallizationIt may be a factor depending on its use in the round
Voting issues should be given:N
The use of jargon or technical language ("extend", "cross-apply", "turn", etc.) during rebuttals:
Final rebuttals should include:
Voting issues are:
How do you decide the winner of the round?
How necessary do you feel the use of evidence (both analytical and empirical) is in the round?I decide who is the person who persuaded me more of his/her position/91 = Not necessary
9 = Always necessary
Please describe your personal note-taking during the round8
I keep detailed notes throughout the round
Note: if you wish for your pronouns to appear the debaters you judge on text/email blasts, log into Tabroom, click Profile at top, and add them in the Pronouns field.I have had experience coaching and judging primarily LD and PF.I view debate as a communication activity which should be an educational experience and be centered around the resolution. Good organization is highly appreciated. I think cross-ex is important in the round. Advocacy of a position is essential on the affirmative and preferred on the negative. Rebuttal speeches should both address line by line and the big picture clarifying the areas of clash. Voting issues are very helpful to my decision.