2024 Doug Campbell Aloha Classic
2024
—
Montebello,
CA/US
Individual Events Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Irene Alvarez
Flintridge Sacred Heart Academy
None
Shahid Anderson
Crescenta Valley High School
None
Nicholas Andrian
Hire
None
David Chamberlain
Claremont
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2024 at 1:28 AM PDT
David Chamberlain
English Teacher and Director of Forensics - Claremont High School, CA
20 years coaching forensics. I usually judge Parliamentary debate at tournaments.
In Parli debate I don't like being bogged down in meta debating. Nor do I appreciate frivolous claims of abuse. I always hope for a clean, fun and spirited debate. I trust in the framer's intent and believe the debaters should too! Logic, wit and style are rewarded.
In PF debate I certainly do not appreciate speed and believe debaters must choose positions carefully being thoughtful of the time constraints of the event. This is the peoples' debate and should be presented as such.
In LD debate I prefer a more traditional debate round with a Value + Value Criterion/Standard that center around philosophical discussions of competing moral imperatives. I understand the trend now is for LD Debaters to advocate plans. I don't know if this is good for the activity. There's already a debate format that exclusively deals with plan debate. LD is not one-person policy debate.
Speed:
I can flow speed debate, but prefer that debate be an oratorical activity.
Theory/T:
I enjoy Theory debates. I don't know that I always understand them. I do count on the debaters being able to clearly understand and articulate any theory arguments to me so that I can be comfortable with my vote. I prefer rounds to be centered on substance, but there is a place for theory. I usually default to reasonability, and don't prefer the competing interpretations model. It takes something egregious for me to vote on T.
Points:
I usually start at a 27.0 and work my way up or down from there. Usually you have to be rude or unprepared to dip below the 27.0.
Counterplans:
I don't think it makes sense to operate a counterplan unless the Aff has presented a plan. If the Aff does go with a Plan debate, then a Counterplan is probably a good strategy. If not, then I don't understand how you can counter a plan that doesn't exist. If this is the debate you want to have, try Policy debate.
Critical Arguments:
The biggest problem with these is that often debaters don't understand their own message / criticism / literature. I feel they are arguments to be run almost exclusively on the Negative, must have a clear link, and a stable alternative that is more substantial than "do nothing", "vote neg", or "examine our ontology/epistemology".
Politics / DAs:
I really enjoy Political discussions, but again, LD is probably the wrong format of debate for the "political implications" of the "plan" that result in impacts to the "status quo" to be discussed.
Ruby Chang
Chino Hills High
None
Christine Duong
Alhambra High School
Last changed on
Sun February 18, 2024 at 12:20 AM PDT
Congressional Debate: Show a good understanding of the bills presented and make a clear argument of your stance. Engage in the debate with good questions that challenge opposing sides, and be prepared to answer questions form the opposing side that challenges your stance. Be confident in the arguments that you present, but also respectful to your opponents.
Last changed on
Sat March 2, 2024 at 4:54 AM PDT
I value clear communication and appreciate a regular speaking speed. Please avoid spreading because if I can’t follow your speeches, I’m unable to judge you fairly as well. I also would really appreciate any and all acronyms to be explained clearly, even if it’s something that might be common, just to make sure I’m on the same page as you. Thank you!!!
Erin Gonzalez
Sonora High School
Last changed on
Sun January 14, 2024 at 7:23 AM PDT
This is only my second year coaching, so please consider me a lay judge with very little debate experience. It's best for you to not assume I have knowledge of the topic and to give as much background as possible. It's important for you to connect your arguments clearly, refute when necessary, and don't speak too rapidly or I may miss some of your points. I will take notes, but would appreciate you emphasizing what you want me to hear when it comes to your framework. I am more swayed by morality and mitigating lives lost than other "fancy" debate tricks. Simple language explaining why you should win could do more to get me on your side.
I ask that you remain respectful to your opponent and to me when I make my decision. Good luck!
Email: egonzalez@fjuhsd.org
Elaine Huynh
Alhambra High School
None
Ammie Hwang
San Marino High School
None
Lifeng Jian
Alhambra High School
None
Vanessa Lee
Crescenta Valley High School
Last changed on
Sat April 6, 2024 at 1:34 AM PDT
Greeting debaters! I look forward to a day of engaged and informative debates. I expect debaters to remain professional and cordial despite the passionate positions they may be asked to take. I will listen carefully to arguments and maintain objectivity, checking my personal opinions and unconscious bias regarding the topic at the door. I will be noting each speaker's efforts regardless of whether they won the specific argument. Good luck and have a good day!
samya McCoy
Crescenta Valley High School
None
Natalia Mora-Avila
Schurr High School
None
Megan Nguyen
Alhambra High School
None
Vicente Ocampo
Alhambra High School
None
Alma Ochoa
Cajon High School
None
Armando Ochoa
Cajon High School
None
Elizabeth Pak
Sunny Hills High School
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 5:48 AM PDT
Elizabeth Pak is has been a licensed attorney in California since 1994.
She has judged speech and debate tournaments.
Hortencia Palicio
Alhambra High School
None
Peter Phan
San Marino High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:41 PM PDT
Do not read fast from your cards (meaning spreading is discouraged and disfavored). If I can't follow your speed read, it does not help your side.
Be articulate.
Make arguments easy to follow.
Ricardo Reitzell
San Marino High School
None
Caroline Sayers
San Marino High School
None
Lina Tan
Alhambra High School
None
Winsome Tong
Alhambra High School
None
Stuart Trapani
Schurr High School
Last changed on
Mon May 13, 2024 at 2:41 AM PDT
5 year speech and debate coach with an appreciation for well-tied arguments.
When in rounds: I appreciate live argumentation instead of reading blocks. A debater should know their arguments and not rely too heavily on notes; be confident in your research and position and you will have an upper hand.
I would rather see a few well-thought arguments vs. many barely covered perspectives, do not spread yourself too thin. Solidly backing your main contentions will ensure your argument comes off clear.
Lastly, be sure to address your opponent's arguments and try to avoid surface questions, when possible.
Deyner Zapata
Alhambra High School
None