CBSR Debate Championship
2024
—
Rancho Cucamonga,
CA/US
All Tournament Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
George Achy
Claremont
None
Rita Alkhouri
Claremont
None
Vanessa Amigon
Cajon High School
None
Gloria Baroi
Redlands High School
None
Godwin S Baroi
Redlands High School
Last changed on
Fri March 8, 2024 at 11:10 PM PDT
I am a new judge, but I have competed in speech and debate from 2016 - 2020.
For debate: Main thing is to be understandable. Basically don't be rude to me OR your competitors. Also, make sure that me AND your competitors can understand you. I don’t like spreading and will not (probably) mark you down for it. But, if I cannot understand you I cannot judge you.
For ies: Please don't be rude to me or your competitors. And remember at the end of the day this is a competition so have respect for each other.
Martha Bautista
Pomona Catholic
None
Jonathan Brandenburg
Los Osos High School
None
Ty Byun
Santiago High School
None
Last changed on
Sat February 10, 2024 at 12:45 AM PDT
I am a college professor with a background in public policy and international relations.
I enjoy judging both speech and debate. With debate, I have a strong preference that debaters speak in a conversational style. Try not to speak super fast - it is often distracting and hard to follow your arguments. In my experience there is ample time to make your points in the time allowed with a conversational style.
Steve Clark
Redlands High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 12:49 AM PDT
First of all, let me start by saying I HATE SPREADING. And I mention it frequently, and we STILL. SEE. SPREADING. You are not auditioning for an auctioneering job, you are trying to present a convincing argument. Three strong points well presented will be more effective with me than ten thrown out in an indecipherable flurry of syllables strung together. CUT IT OUT.
Good information well documented goes without saying. But there, I just said it anyway.
A presentation that has an arc, where the delivery is smooth throughout but that varies in tone, volume, rate, intensity, etc. will always tend to sway me in your favor. Good signposting is smiled upon.
Finally, look and sound like you're having a good time, or at least that you have something that you're glad you get a chance to present. Have confidence in yourself, and know that even if you stumble, you're going to get through this. And of course, when you find yourself totally lost and the information or words that you had right there two minutes ago have somehow disappeared, stop, smile, regroup and carry on. You will get through this. Probably doing better than you think.
Be mindful of your judging pool. Especially when you have less experienced parent judges, consider taking your time for an extra beat here and there, be sure to signpost well, enunciate and speak up. Some of us are old and not as quick as we used to be. Good luck, have fun, and, as we say in my hometown, Don't Forget To Be Awesome.
Ron Cook
Yucaipa High School
None
Frank Delaney
Claremont
None
Amy Depew
Santiago High School
Last changed on
Sat April 13, 2024 at 2:18 AM PDT
Hello debaters! I am your friendly, neighborhood judge here to give you a few tips about me. I am a parent volunteer and I have been judging for about two years. I look for solid logical arguments and the ability to refute poor logic. You've worked hard to be here so please make sure I can understand you. Don't speak so quickly that your words disappear. Don't be too quiet, but please don't shout at me either. One last note, please DO NOT talk over each other. Be respectful of each other.
Amy
Meagan Dickson
Yucaipa High School
None
Kathryn Duncan
Santiago High School
None
Ayesha Dunn
Santiago High School
None
Sebastian Elizalde
Yucaipa High School
None
Tanya Escamilla
Claremont
None
Parrish Eyre
Los Osos High School
Last changed on
Fri February 9, 2024 at 11:43 AM PDT
Hello
My name is Parrish Eyre. I own a small Management Consulting firm specializing in Business and IT Process reengineering. I have no formal training in debate but absolutely love it and have the greatest amount of respect for those that are willing to step up the the mic and articulate an argument.
From an experience perspective I spent 4 years as a University student grade/infraction appeal judge and a traffic court judge.
If you read nothing else: be respectful to one another. You will not win if you are not kind.
For LD Sections Debate:
I am not an expert in LD. Take it easy, and treat me as a lay judge here. A lot of the same points mentioned below about PF apply to a typical LD round in some form. Debate definitions first, and explain everything.
Thoughts: I believe every argument you make must be founded on evidence and research. Arguments with no sources won't be weighed. If a team introduces evidence that is found to be outright falsified, the round ends in a loss for that team and a discussion between myself and their coach. It is every competitor's responsibility to ensure your teammates and your opponents are properly using evidence.
I judge based on the evidence and arguments presented in the round. That means if your opponents argue that the sky is green, and you don't question them or their evidence, then the sky is green.
Things I like in debate:
-Clear frameworks. This is how I will vote, and usually means defining key parts of the resolution and presenting a weighing mechanism.
-Weighed impacts. How do your impacts stack up against your opponents'? Tell me explicitly, especially in summary and final focus.
-Organized arguments. Signpost. I can better keep track of organized arguments, helping you win.
-Critical thinking. Point out logical inconsistencies, make sure your opponents aren't misrepresenting evidence, etc.
-Unique arguments. As long as your evidence and logic are solid, these can be fun. Make sure they're in the scope of the resolution.
Things I don't like in debate:
-Non-topical arguments. Often called "Kritics" or "K's," these do not fly with me. You have a resolution, debate it.
-Shot-gunning evidence. One good source is always worth more than a dozen poor sources.
-Argument spreading. “Judge, they dropped our third and tenth contention, so you must vote for us.” I will not.
-Talking too fast. Slow down. There is no need to yell. If I can actually write down everything you say you'll be better off.
-New arguments after rebuttals. I may consider new evidence if you are asked for it, but brand-new arguments won't be considered.
-Falsifying or supported evidence.
Feel free to ask me any questions you have before or after the round. We are here to grow and learn new skills.
Lastly, good luck and have fun :)
Shannon Farren-Stroud
Los Osos High School
Last changed on
Sun February 11, 2024 at 11:57 PM PDT
Hello!
I was a past debater for about three years, specializing in LD, but I have done both PuFo and Parli as well. I do flow and base a lot of the round on the flow, so please be good with signposting! Treat me kind of like a lay judge, over explain if you want, and tell me where you are on the flow during speeches. As far as pronouns go I use any, feel free to state yours if comfortable.
Not a fan of spreading/super fast talking, I can flow fast if need be but I'd prefer not to as I'll likely miss some arguments. Also not a big fan of kritiks and off-topic arguments. I was always a traditional debater- pen and paper- so adding more policy takes to LD makes it harder on me since I'm not a big fan of the two colliding at all. Traditional > circuit debate.
I put a lot of focus on the value/value criterion debate so please go philosophical and hit me hard with it!! Connect your case and contentions deeply with your framework and impacts. Speaking of impacts, state them clearly, please!!!
If you have questions before the round feel free to ask! All in all, focus on having a respectful debate.
Rebecca Gamble
Yucaipa High School
None
Kimberly Garber
Redlands High School
None
Michelle Ghostine
Redlands High School
None
Last changed on
Sat March 2, 2024 at 4:54 AM PDT
I value clear communication and appreciate a regular speaking speed. Please avoid spreading because if I can’t follow your speeches, I’m unable to judge you fairly as well. I also would really appreciate any and all acronyms to be explained clearly, even if it’s something that might be common, just to make sure I’m on the same page as you. Thank you!!!
BrittMary Guerre-Aguilar
Redlands High School
None
Manuel Guevara
Claremont
None
Linda Hernandez
Pomona Catholic
None
Katherine Irvine
Claremont
Last changed on
Fri April 12, 2024 at 6:21 AM PDT
I am a volunteer parent with over a year’s experience judging speech and debate events. I judge for a number of reasons, most importantly is that a seeing the skills and dedication students have for connecting community members and making society batter for all GIVES ME JOY AND HOPE!
In order for me to best judge events it helps me if students:
- Speak slowly enough for people who may be unfamiliar with the subject vocabulary to follow what they are saying;
- Project their voices and speak more loudly if they notice me leaning or cupping an ear toward them;
- Are silent, still audience members; and,
- Keep noise to a minimum in buildings where events are taking place.
In debates, as I do my best to follow the arguments, logic, supporting points, refutations, and how definitions and weighing mechanisms apply. When students explicitly indicate what points they are providing support or a critique for, and how they think their definitions and weighing mechanisms matter, it helps me be a better judge of these important factor.
Also, I recognize that critiquing and interrupting others, speaking loudly, dramatic gesturing, and heckling are all used in various debates, but I also pay close attention to any instances of people invading the personal space of others, yelling at or personally insulting their opponent, or otherwise not respecting the equal rights of all debaters, and I will ask coaches for guidance in how to judge what I think I have seen. I love the community I see among speech and debate teams!
I hope EVERY student feels proud and enjoys tournaments as I am impressed by the work and courage of EVERYONE participating. If students do not get the recognition they hoped for I encourage them to remember that judges such as me are not professionals and may make mistakes. That may be a reality we all have to accept, but if anything seems unfair please speak with a coach.
Best wishes and thank you for your consideration.
Katrina Keil
Claremont
None
Yu Jin Kim
Redlands High School
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 12:13 PM PDT
Hello all,
I am a parent judge. I have been judging the student congress debate for last three years.
For the contents of your speech, I would like to hear the debate about the harm and benefit analysis of the bill based on the flow of the chamber arguments and your data. I also look at the type of speeches you present during the round. I expect an argumentative speech if you speak later. If you bring an applicable real-life impact to your speech, that also counts for a good ranking. For the delivery, it matters to me if a student speaks with a clear sound, a persuasive tone, and a natural talking style. I give a favor to a student who participates in the debate actively with critical questions to weigh the side of the bill. I rank PO well if the PO runs the chamber efficiently. Good luck, and have fun!
Gavin Li
Los Osos High School
None
kevin liu
Cajon High School
None
Eamonn McCormick
Pomona Catholic
None
Mara Isabella Medina-Verjat
Redlands High School
None
Johannes Moenius
Redlands High School
Last changed on
Fri March 1, 2024 at 11:51 PM PDT
First and foremost, I would like to let you know how much I respect all the effort you have been spending for preparing for your tournaments. I am looking forward to seeing a glimpse of how you will bring it to fruition.
I am a lay judge. I value information rich, logically consistent arguments. I also appreciate skillful rhetoric.
I will try to flow, but if contentions are dropped, make sure you make that clear and emphasize impacts of these concessions.
Charlene Neusse
Los Osos High School
None
Melissa Peykani
Redlands High School
None
Charles Peyton
Redlands High School
None
Alanna Quinn
Los Osos High School
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:34 AM PDT
Hello! :D
I did speech and debate my entire time in high school, with a focus on IE and Congress. I've watched a lot of debate rounds over the years, but please treat me like I know absolutely nothing! I like to see well-outlined cases with clear evidence, values, contentions, transitions, etc. I take a lot of notes, and I always refer back to them when I make my decision.
There will always be clashing evidence and, instead of arguing the same point back and forth, please focus on the value/value criterion! It's my favorite part of debate, so state and connect them clearly throughout your entire case. If you feel like you're mentioning it too much, that's just the way I like it :).
Also, it's never impacted my decision, but presentation is important to me! I was a speech kid, after all. Enunciate, have good volume, good posture, etc. Whatever makes you look and feel confident at the podium.
Adam Ramirez
Los Osos High School
Last changed on
Sun April 14, 2024 at 2:47 AM PDT
I used to do debate. Economics and Education are my specialties.
I am not a lay judge. If you see me stop typing then go onto your next point
I will consider goofy arguments if they are better than serious ones. As long as they are debated correctly.
IMPACTS IMPACTS IMPACTS
PLEASE don't knock on the desk after each speech.
If you want feedback ask me after the round. I will not be writing long RFD’s.
If both teams agree I will judge a round off of double loss theory.
Do NOT spread. I will stop listening and start playing Clash of Clans.
Do NOT BS your information. I will know...
But if you can make it rhyme your score will be prime.
If you have a P.O.O. please say “Pause time Poop” That will be funny I think.
good luck.
Padma Rangarajan
Claremont
Last changed on
Sat February 10, 2024 at 12:11 AM PDT
I value clear, logically reasoned arguments delivered at a comprehendible speed. Signposting is excellent. Pithy and unique turns of phrase are a definite plus. Eye contact, tonal modulations, and a sense of your personality are all important.
An unusual, thought-provoking case is always appreciated provided you can back it up with facts/logical reasoning, and you're not working way outside of the box. Ontological arguments, for example, are often not particularly persuasive.
Thomas Rendon
Cajon High School
None
Albert Sandoval
Los Osos High School
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:24 AM PDT
Experience: I have three years of experience in parliamentary debate, and am familiar with the structure and style of LD debates.
Argumentation: I want clear arguments followed by quality evidence. I expect debaters to engage in meaningful clash, which means identifying weak points in their opponents' arguments and explaining how these weaknesses either hinder their opponents' cases or bolster their own. Finally, I prefer arguments to be impactful, and will consider the weight of contentions over the quantity of them.
Time Management: I want you to talk a normal pace. I can understand if you speak quickly, but don't go too fast. I will also time you independently, and will give a grace period if time is up to wrap things up. From there I will respectfully cut you off if you continue on.
Hosung So
Los Osos High School
None
Rich Spencer
Redlands High School
None
Manu Sridharan
Claremont
None
Chirag Vora
Santiago High School
None
Tiffany Williams
Claremont
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 12:11 AM PDT
I like to see a lot of clash between arguments. I like it when competitors explain their argument and the impact of their arguments. I weigh heavily on the value criterion and voting issues expressed in the first constructive speeches, extending to the last rebuttal speeches. I do not like fast reading or spreading. I am OK with value debates, policy debate and philosophical debates.
Patricia Winter
Cajon High School
None
XINGDONG ZHANG
Redlands High School
None