Grapevine Classic
2023 — Grapevine, TX/US
Speech Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideAnishka Ande
State Qualified in Oratory (x2) and Info (x1) - Nat Qualled for OO (2022)
FOR SPEECH:
IEs will forever and always be my favorite event. Not just because it pains me to sit through a debate round (especially policy), but because I love how our event is centered around telling our story and sharing a unique message with the world. Because of this, I am much more swayed to vote for an individual with a unique topic they are clearly passionate about. However, I still have certain prefs:
-
My speech coach was from the Missouri speech circuit. Because of this, physical presentation MATTERS, from how you are dressed to your confidence to the variation & necessary use of hand signals. Doesn't necessarily mean you need to wear a skirt-suit and have your hair up in twisties, but please be presentable. A croc equals a doc.
-
That being said, if you forget your speech or stumble once, please do NOT stress yourself out. I understand that things happen and one small slip should not cost you the round. I will know whether you're nervous versus if you are unprepared.
-
Make sure to pace yourself. Though I do appreciate the generic speech voice and style, I'm mainly just looking for a speech that sounds crisp and finished. Please don't force yourself to sound a certain way to match your competitors. Do whatever comes to you.
-
Remember to be nice to your fellow competitors. Everyone's a little nervous, no matter how much or how often they've done this. If I hear anything disrespectful or snide, it will affect your rank.
-
I always appreciate an improved line referencing the room in the intro LOL
-
At the end of the day, passion outweighs for me. If you truly care about your topic and want us to care about it just as much, it will translate in your speech.
- Please don't talk about your performance/how you think you did in front of me. If you messed up or something and I didn't notice, that's good for you. Don't call it out in front of me.
- I care about engagement. You should be watching and learning from fellow competitors.
I won't lie, part of me will be jealous of you guys speaking up there. IEs are so near and dear to my heart, I'm so excited to see what you guys do!
For Extemp:
If you have a creative AGD and a cohesive speech, you will be ranked high. Extra point for any Taylor Swift reference.
For WSD:
-
I enjoy framework debates
-
Speaking style is important, make sure you are clear with what you are saying and you at least sound confident in your argument.
-
POIs are very important, I tend to notice they answer the main hard-hitting issues in the round, so please actually ask them to enhance your points.
LD/PF/POLICY:
I have done all of these events, and I still have trouble following a hardcore LD round. Treat me as a half lay.
-
weighing is important
-
disclosure arguments are fun
-
I want to be on the email chain
-
Spreading is okay, as long as your main arguments are still CLEAR and you slow down to emphasize some points. (please only spread if you CAN spread)
-
for pf, you can skip grand cross if you want, I don't mind.
CONGRESS:
Wow, you're a congress kid! You do you :)
(*see extemp prefs above)
Iffat Anisha (she/her)
CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE
My judging philosophy centers on a balanced evaluation of substance and style. I believe in fostering an environment where respect, critical thinking, and effective communication thrive, so I will rank you on such.
-
I value well-organized speeches. Provide relevant context, and use transitions for a coherent flow. I always appreciate roadmapping.
-
I won’t take a point into account unless you cite evidence, which means author, date, publication, etc… Make sure your evidence is relevant and not only supports your arguments, but strengthens them.
-
Clash is key. Sure, new arguments are great, but moving the debate forward with successful rebuttals really showcases your grasp of the issues and your ability to dissect opposing views, so I will rank you higher on my ballot if you can do that effectively.
-
I want to see impacts for every argument you bring up. Illustrate the real-world implications of your arguments. How do they affect policies, communities, or individuals?
-
I do pay attention to your engagement in round. Keep your placards up to ask questions and demonstrate use of parliamentary procedure as much as you can. This will establish a stronger round presence, so I’ll pay attention to you more.
-
For presiding officers: Y’all should be very well versed in parliamentary procedure, and I expect to see little to no mistakes in precedence and recency, which I will also keep track of on my own. Keep the round going as smoothly, fairly and efficiently as possible, and I can rank you a 1 on my ballot.
-
Most importantly, be respectful. I don't care how good you are. I will happily drop you if you use any sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc… language any time in round.
Feel free to ask me any questions or contact me about your ballots at ianisha194@gmail.com
Hello! My name is Jessica Apodaca-Burks (she/her) but feel free to call me Jess!
I went to Grapevine High School and graduated back in 2020 and I am so excited to be judging and stay connected with that activity :)
When I'm judging, I look for a few key things-
- Cleanliness
- Understanding of the material
- Do you know the intent behind what you're saying/doing?
- Are you hitting your events/ operatives?
Keep calm and have fun when you're performing, the number one thing that will win you the round is being comfortable and confident with your piece and performance :)
I'm not a debate person so if I'm judging debate please treat me as a lay judge because it is Not my strong suit.
In Congressional Debate: Analysis is the most important factor. Sources are paramount. Clash is expected. Delivery is secondary.
In Extemp: Give a CLEAR answer to the question, need good time allocation, good sources. I consider this public speaking, not interp.
In OO/Info: Need clear structure with sources. I consider this a public speaking event, not interp.
In Interp: Need different levels, clear characterization. I need to be able to follow your story.
anthonyrbrown85@gmail.com for the chain
*Please show up to the round pre-flowed and ready to go. If you get to the room before me or are second flight, flip and get the email chain started so we don't delay the rounds.*
Background
Currently the head coach at Southlake Carroll. The majority of my experience is in Public Forum but I’ve spent time either competing or judging every event.
General
You would probably classify me as a flay judge. The easiest way to win my ballot is through comparative weighing. Explain why your links are clearer and stronger and how your impacts are more important than those of your opponents.
Speed is fine but if I miss something that is crucial to your case because you can’t speak fast and clearly at the same time then that’ll be your fault. If you really want to avoid this issue then I would send a speech doc if you plan on going more than 225 wpm.
I do not flow cross so if anything important was said mention it in a speech.
I would classify myself as tech over truth but let’s not get too crazy.
Speaking
Typical speaks are between 27-30. I don’t give many 30s but it’s not impossible to get a 30 from me.
I would much rather you sacrifice your speed for clarity. If you can’t get to everything that you need to say then it would probably be best to prioritize your impacts and do a great job weighing.
Any comments that are intended (or unintended in certain circumstances) to be discriminatory in any form will immediately result in the lowest possible speaker points.
PF Specific
I’m probably not evaluating your K or theory argument at a non-bid tournament. If you’re feeling brave then you can go for it but unless the literature is solid and it is very well run, I’m going to feel like you’re trying to strat out of the debate by utilizing a style that is not yet a norm and your opponents likely did not plan for. If we're at a bid tournament or state, go for it.
Don’t just extend card names and dates without at least briefly reminding me what that card said. Occasionally I write down the content of the card but not the author so if you just extend an author it won’t do you any good.
I have a super high threshold for IVIs. If there's some sort of debate based abuse run a proper shell.
LD Specific (This is not my primary event so I would make sure I check this)
Cheatsheet (1 is most comfortable, 5 is lowest)
Policy: 1
Theory: 2
Topical Ks: 2
Phil: 4
Non-Topical Ks: 4
Tricks: 5
I’ll understand your LARP arguments. I’ll be able to follow your spreading. I can evaluate most K’s but am most comfortable with topical K’s. I will understand your theory arguments but typically don't go for RVIs. I would over-explain if you don’t fall into those categories and adjust if possible.
I am the Director of Interp and Oratory/Assistant Director of Forensics at Seven Lakes High School in Katy, Texas. I did speech in high school in Texas, and I am also a thespian -- I have a BFA in acting and I was a theatre director prior to specializing in Speech and Debate.
Conflicts: Seven Lakes (TX), Wimberley (TX)
First and foremost, I am a theatre person and a speech coach by training and by trade.
Congress
Don't speed through your speeches, speed matters to me. Style matters to me as well, I am looking for structured arguments with clean rhetoric that comes in a polished package. Introduce new arguments. In questioning, I look for fully answering questions while also furthering your argument. I notice posture and gestures -- and they do matter to me. Evidence should be relevant and (for the most part) recent. Evidence is pretty important to me, and outweighs clean delivery if used properly. A clean analysis will rank you up on my ballot as well. Don't yell at each other. Overall, be respectful of one another. If I don't see respect for your fellow competitors, it can be reflected on my ballot. Don't rehash arguments. An extra speech with something I have already heard that round is likely to bump you down when I go to rank. As far as PO's go, I typically start them at 4 or 5, and they will go up or down depending on how clean the round runs. A clean PO in a room full of really good speakers will likely be ranked lower on my ballot. As far as delivery goes...as it says above, I am a speech coach. Your volume, rate, diction, etc are important. Make sure you are staying engaged and talking to the chamber, not at the chamber -- I want to be able to tell that you care about what you are speaking on.
Interp:
I am looking for honest connection to character and to text. Blocking should be motivated by the text and make sense for the character. I look for using vocal variety to add to the text and really paint a picture. I want you to really connect and tell the story. I also look for an overall arc of the story, clear beat changes, and clear emotion. I also look for clean diction and an appropriate rate of speech. Additionally, environment should be clear and blocking should be clean. In single events, I want to see the connection to your “other” (who are you sharing this with in the context of the story). In partner events, I want to see you really connect to each other. If you play more than one character, I am looking for clear and clean differences between the characters. Overall, tell your story. Connect to character, and share that with the audience.
Public Speaking:
Delivery is very important to me. Be careful of overusing gestures, make sure they have a purpose and enhance what you say. I want to see you connected to sharing your speech, not simply reciting something you memorized. While I do tend to notice style before content, it is important that your content is accurate and adequately supported. The content of the speech and the way it flows is important. I also look at diction and rate of delivery. In info, I do like fun interactive visuals—but they need to enhance your speech, not be there just to fill space. Overall, I want you to be excited about your speech and to have fun delivering it.
PF:
-
I try to flow, but please make sure you reiterate important points as they become useful to your argument.
-
Speed is okay, as long as I can understand you.
- Articulation matters to me. I would rather you speak a little slower and not get caught up in what you are saying.
-
I really look for you to answer each other’s attacks on cases, not just repeat what you have already told me if it doesn't address the opposing case.
-
Giving me a clear road map and sticking to it always helps.
-
If a team is misrepresenting evidence, make it clear to me and tell me how they are doing so.
-
Overall, I want you to tell me why you are right AND why they are wrong. Make sure you are backing up your claims with evidence and statistics.
I am a relatively new parent judge. I enjoy listening to and judging debates.
I have interest in politics, investing, philosophy, psychology and sociology. I had my MBA education many years ago and worked in Banking for 20+ years.
For LD debates, I evaluate the combination of the following aspects -
1) Solid case build - proof, the value framework.
2) Clash and rebuttal - I value effective rebuttal and responses using logic and proofs. Please be respectful of your opponent.
3) Delivery - clear, audible and comprehensible, and to speak persuasively to the listeners. I am ok with spreading and will try to follow your flow.
Meghan Clark (she/her)
Experience:
–competed in LD on the Texas UIL circuit
–coached LD for 7 years, policy for 5, also on the Texas UIL circuit
–currently coach extemp/platform events at Plano West
PF:
--I am a fairly typical flay judge.
--Truth over tech. I do not particularly like kritiks or other non-resolution based arguments (not a huge fan of progressive debate). Don’t run theory about dates, speaks, disclosure, etc. - I have zero interest in judging this. I strongly dislike frivolous theory arguments and tricks. Don’t run them.
--Make sure that you extend your arguments and signpost clearly. No sticky defense.
--I care a good deal about weighing impacts in the back half of the round. Make sure you do this. Don’t introduce new arguments in the second half of the round, and I don’t want arguments that consist of three blippy arguments with buzzwords. I would vastly prefer substantive weighing of impacts. I generally default to probability over magnitude.
--I care about quality rather than quantity of evidence. You must have clear taglines for your evidence. Don’t paraphrase.
--Make sure you are courteous to opponents and don’t speak over them during crossfire. I expect professionalism, respect and civility towards me and towards your opponents. If you are verbally or non-verbally showing disrespect towards your opponents or me, expect to lose speaker points. It goes without saying that you should not be racist/sexist/ableist/homophobic/etc. in any way during the round.
--I do not like spreading. PF should be accessible to a wide audience, and spreading makes that difficult. Speak at a normal rate of speed if you expect me to flow your argument. Extreme speed will most likely result in lower speaks. If I call “clear,” slow down.
--In final focus, make the case for why you deserve my vote - don’t demand my vote.
--Strike me if you’re reading a meme or social experiment case.
--Stick to the time structure - no skipping grand cross for PF.
--If a card is heavily disputed during round, I will call for it.
I've been a Theatre Director for 23 years. I was an active member of Texas Thespians and coached students in all of the IE events. I have judged at the Texas Thespian Conventions for over 10 years. I have directed many award wining UIL One Act Plays.
I'm excited to be able to judge this year. I'm looking for students that are well prepared and excited about performing. I also understand that not all students are experienced and this is an educational learning process. I always look for strengths and weaknesses and give quality critiques that value the work the students have invested.
Interp Events I'm looking for the basic qualities of a strong performance. Vocal Quality, Physical Characteristics, Subtext of the material and performance energy.
For Public Speaking Events, sources are imperative, clear structure. I do not view these events as Interp.
Tanya Reni Galloway
I enjoy analyzing the quality of evidence, persuasive techniques, and presentation style of all debate categories. I have judged all debate categories over the past 10 plus years including Congress, FX, DX, CX, LD, PF, BQ, and WS. I am an old-school purist. I judge all categories so I prefer that each category stays in its own lane. Having said that, I realize many students love progressive argumentation, so I say tabula rasa. I will judge the style they are trained in and give feedback accordingly. It is always about the student. My feedback and comments, on my ballots, are designed to empower the student to take their game in debate and life to the next level. I believe our speech and debate students are developing themselves as leaders and can use their skills to make profound differences when applied to areas of life that matter to them.
I also judge all IE events. I love OO, when done well, it is like a mini TED talk. I love to see the WHY. Why did the student choose the topic or selection? What resonates for them? In the categories which require acting skills, I really look for a connection between the student and the selection, when the student embodies the selection and becomes the character. I believe acting skills can build empathy and connection to the human condition. These students can use these skills and apply them in an area of life that they are passionate about and make a difference in the world. They can be the voice for others, who do not have the courage or opportunity to speak or perform in front of others.
I competed in high school and college and won awards in acting, singing, and public speaking events. I was a professional actress and trained at the Film Actors Lab. I am a trained toastmasters judge. I currently lecture on art as therapy. I was also the manager of the Communications Programs for the Dallas branch of a global personal and professional develop company, Landmark Worldwide.
I am an enthusiastic supporter of academic sports. Speech and debate participation provides cognitive and behavioral enhancement. It improves reading, listening, speaking, critical thinking, and writing skills. It also improves motivation and increases curiosity and engagement. I enjoy empowering the future leaders of our community and world. I encourage the students to take the skills they are learning and to apply them to areas of life that are of concern to them now, so they can make a difference and learn the practical value of their skills. It increases engagement for both at-risk and gifted students. I also think coaches are rock stars! Thank you for the difference you make each day with your students. It takes heart, dedication, patience, and perseverance, You are the one they will always remember.
I am a new Judge, and I enjoy judging speeches. I have Judged several speech competitions this year. While Judging, I look for a strong introduction and conclusion and would like to hear more logical and supportive data and analysis of the stance one is taking. I do my best I can to judge each Speech on its own merits. I take notes during the Speech and rate the candidate on the style, delivery, content, analysis, examples/citations, and the strong introduction and conclusion.
I'm a Tabula Rasa judge so I rely on the debaters and the flow to set both the validity of arguments and the role of the ballot. That means that I'll accept any argument until the other side contests it with argumentation or theory and puts it into play. I really enjoying seeing the rebuttals is weighing of impacts and holistic evaluation that inform my ballot. Evidence is important, but every argument should also have analysis. It is important that you have a very clear link chain throughout the debate. It is also important that you clearly weigh and impact your arguments (the earlier in the debate the better). BE COMPARATIVE. Do not make me have to choose which impact I think might be more important than another. Don't just tell me what your impacts are. Weigh and tell me why they matter, and comparatively weigh against your opponents. I will evaluate whatever arguments you present in round.
Make it easy for me to vote, weigh the round at the end.
Style/Delivery Preference:
Spreading is fine
You must be clear and articulate.
Slow down/emphasize on your taglines.
Signpost!!
Be respectful and nice to your partner and opponents.
Have Fun :)
I'm a parent judge with one year of judging experience in Speech events.
Here are things that affect how I might score events I'm judging:
- Clear, well-paced enunciation -- if someone speaks too quickly, it may be difficult for me to hear what they are trying to convey
- Correct pronunciation of commonly-used words and sources(if a competitor isn't sure of how to pronounce a word, they should look up how to pronounce it correctly)
- If a competitor misstates a fact, I don't score them as highly
- Staying within the allotted time (I resort to this as a tie-breaker if I can't otherwise decide on whether one piece is better is than another)
- For extemp, I count off if the speech is super-short
I am primarily an interp coach. If I am judging you in debate, please do not assume I know anything about the resolution or any of your cases. I will judge based on who makes the best argument, with warrants and supporting evidence. Be clear about what you are arguing and why you are winning the debate. Speak clearly and confidently, do not be rude or condescending.
Good Luck!
School Affiliation: Coach at The Episcopal School of Dallas
Coaching & Judging Experience: I have been coaching teams and judging tournaments since 2006. This includes LD, PF, Congress, CX and IEs at different schools in Virginia and Texas. I have had debaters qualify for NCFL and NSDA on multiple occasions which are both considered traditional tournaments.
Speed: Although I am personally not a fan of it, please make sure your spreading is clear and coherent. If I can't understand you, I probably will not flow it. If you see me stop flowing for an extended period of time then it would be in your best interest to slow down. I also heavily prefer if you go slow on your taglines, analytics and any theory arguments, especially during your rebuttals.
Types of Arguments: Although I prefer framework heavy debates, a lot of clash in the round, and good crystallization and overviews in your final rebuttal, I will still vote on topicality, counterplans, some theory arguments at times and kritiks if they are explained well by the debater. I am not a fan of non-topical Affs as I tend to favor whole resolution ACs. Make sure when you run T, that you are linking your violation to your standards/voting issues and that when you run a CP, you explain your net benefits and how it's competitive.
Theory Argument: If you run any disclosure theory or new affs bad arguments, make sure you thoroughly break down the reasons to prefer. Although I have never really been a fan of these types of arguments, I am willing to consider them if you can show the impacts of the abuse committed by your opponent and how this outweighs. Please make sure that whatever theory shells you plan on running are presented at a slower rate of speed.
Kritiks: Run at your own risk because I'm not really a fan of complicated philosophical arguments that have nothing to do with the actual resolution that should be debated upon. I'm not saying you can't win if you run them, but I might look at you funny and simply not flow the argument depending on the complexity of the K.
Speaks: Clarity over speed is prefered. If your spreading is incomprehensible, this will reflect on your speaker points. Any acts of rudeness or displays of an unprofessional demeanor towards your opponent will also be taken into account. If you go against an inexperienced debater or a traditional style opponent, it would be in your best interest to accommodate their format and invest some time clashing with or turning their value, criterion and contentions. Also, please do not ask me if I disclose speaker points. It's not going to happen. In addition, please do not use profanity at all during the round. It will impact your speaks and could also impact my decision so don't do it. Lastly, please refrain from attacking the character of any political figures or political parties as a whole. It's okay to discuss policies of the USFG but please avoid bashing politicians or parties that you may dislike as I consider that type of tactic in a debate to be very unprofessional and offensive. Debaters have lost my ballot over this in the past.
Tricks: Please don't.
Overview: Debate the resolution, clash with your opponent's arguments, provide framework, slow down during tags and analytics, throw in some voters at the end.
Email Chain: If and only if both debaters are sharing files, please include my email as well: kesslert@esdallas.org
I have been a volunteer parent judge for the past 2 years. I have two children who are high school debaters.
First of all, let me say I am so proud of each and every one of you! You are in an elite group of students, even if this is your first tournament. It takes a great amount of courage to speak in front of, and be judged by, strangers.
My degrees are in communication (BS) and journalism (MA). My favorite class was communication theory. I have experience as a public speaker, so I understand being nervous, especially your first few times. Just breathe, slow down, and know that you're going to learn from this no matter where you rank.
I enjoy judging speech events. I have a very specific process (with pen and paper) to evaluate, track and rank as I go through a round. You will see me writing throughout your speech, but I am listening. Do not take my lack of eye contact as disinterest.
If your tone is flat and your delivery lacks emotion, expect a lower rank. The speeches I remember are the ones that make me react emotionally--laughter, tears, frustration, etc.
In a round of six people, places 1 & 2 and 5 & 6 are usually easy to place. Those in the middle can be difficult, and it can come down to finished times. You can have a great speech, but if you're a minute short of the time, it may affect where I rank you if other great speeches are closer to time.
I try to give individual feedback, but with a shortage of judges we can get back to back rounds and run out of time.
Don't take it personally if you didn't rank as high as you hoped. Every speaker can have an "off" day and so can every judge. There is no such thing as failure if you learned something from the experience.
Hello, I’m a former debater that has competed in UIL, TFA at both the state and national levels. I’m ok with any arguments as long as they make sense and are warranted.
Participated in Congress and IX all 4 years at Obra D. Tompkins
General Paradigm: Honestly as long as you explain your arguments well and tell me why they matter (I'm big on impact calc. This means clear warrants and links. I like to have my job be easier so tell me right from the start what I need to vote on and what stuff is important in the context of the round. If you don't do that I'll be forced to become a policymaker which means I may default to impacts that you may not have focused on. Summary and final focus speeches should be mirrored. This means the arguments that you flesh out and extend are the same ones you should be speaking about in the FF. Don't bother bringing up dropped/dead arguments near the end of the round. You are just gonna be wasting my time. When extending args, include the (warrants, links, and impacts). Make sure you give me voters on why your args matter, and why you win. I weigh presentation and content equally!
Keep your own time. I will be keeping time as well.
Feel free to ask me about anything I may not have covered.
In Public Forum and Extemp: I value delivery & analysis supported by evidence from credible sources. I want to know the significance of your topic and what are the impacts of your arguments, tell me why it matters. I can't vote for points and impacts I can't hear or understand, so slow up for key points and explain them clearly. Understand that you are Debating not Arguing, this is an important distinction that must be known by each debater!
In Congressional Debate: I value the natural delivery of points and impacts and reasonable positions. I look for acknowledgment of prior speakers' points and clash leading to good argumentation and refutation, and for purposeful questioning leading to clarity, understanding, or insight. A lack of clash is frowned upon. Knowledge of and adherence to Parliamentary Procedure is expected in the chamber. Skillful Presiding Officers make sessions a positive experience for all and will be ranked accordingly.
In Oratory, Info, and Impromptu: I value your originality, creativity, and persuasive presentation of ideas of personal importance. Cite your sources, explain their importance, and tell me why it matters.
In DI, HI, DUO, Poetry, and Prose: It is crucial that you tell a story in a meaningful and impactful manner. Characterization, gestures and facial expressions, and, vocal variation will all add to the overall decision. Along, with the dramatic structure of the piece and mindful storytelling!
Overall speaking skills or/and argumentation are critical to winning! But remember the most important thing is that you learn!
Spoken Word: It is crucial that you tell a story in a meaningful and impactful manner. Characterization, gestures and facial expressions, and, vocal variation will all add to the overall decision. Along, with the dramatic structure, organization, clear theme, and mindful storytelling!
Please speak slowly. Speed is okay but please slow down for important points.
Do not be unnecessarily aggressive, never be offensive, and avoid excessive gestures.
I cannot understand your speech without a clear structure. For me to comprehend your speech accurately, it is necessary to provide it with a clear and structured format.
I am a stock issues judge however I will vote for whomever has clear framework and well constructed arguments throughout the debate. I will vote based off of refutation as well as dropped arguments if they truly hurt your case. Clarity of argumentation is most important throughout the debate round. I will flow rounds and I will consider drops, cross-application, and extensions when making my decisions. I strongly agree with the concept of quality vs. quantity. I will not vote for a team who chooses to speed through information rather a team who is making sound and impactful argumentation.
Hello everyone! My name is KJ (he/him), I competed all 4 years of high school and now go to Texas State University.
I am primarily an IE person. I competed in every IE event including OO, Info, and Extemp. I as well competed in World Schools a bit too. I was a 4x state qualifier, state finalist, 5x state semi finalist, 2x NIETOC semifinalist, and a 3x NSDA qualifier. I was as well an All-State and All-American competitor with over 2200 NSDA points. What I am looking for is understanding of the piece. How well thought out it is and how much effort you have noticeably put into it goes a LONG way.
IE's
- Needs to be clean, concise, and have a deeper meaning as to why you're telling the story, interp is acting with a purpose
- Be proud of what you're performing! and have fun with it!
- Characterization is key, I want to see real peoples stories that I am actually able to connect to
- I want to know what's going on! Don't just throw us into the middle of everything, give us some exposition, who are you? Where are you? What is going on?
OO, Info, Extemp, WS
- Are you just telling me the facts? Or are you engaging with the information and the topic you've chosen and presenting it in an effective way?
- Charisma is KEY, you wrote this speech, be proud of it!
- How well thought out is your argument or topic?
- Are you speaking fluidly and confidently or are you using filler words and swaying nervously?
- Make sure that you're applying the facts that you give to the grand scheme of things, what are the implications?
Like I said earlier, I was always more of an interp person. However, I do know all of the rules and the ins and outs of debate! I may not be as adept as I am with speech but I know my way around. Essentially just treat me as a lay judge who knows a lot about the subject.
Debate
- Well thought out arguments will go a long way, the more you put into a speech the more you will get out of it, and trust me when I say that we as judges notice how much effort you put into it
- How well do you structure your speech? How well does it flow?
- How do you respond to questions and how do you interact in the round?
- Don't just tell me what you are going to do but also HOW you are going to accomplish it and WHY
- Add me to the email chain plz - kjamarino@gmail.com
- As far as flowing goes, I'm not a stickler for it during cross so don't worry about it
- I can follow spreading but if you'd like to have mercy on my soul and not that would be awesome
- I'm not a huge theory argument person, so if I feel you're twisting the resolution in a way that it most likely wasn't intended as may not work if its too far out there
All of these are just my personal opinions regarding judging, please do not change your speech or performance based on trying to get my 1. So long as you have fun, enjoy what you're doing, and you are proud of the work you've presented, that is all I ask.
Email: kjamarino@gmail.com
For TFA State:
Interp: I am a pretty open minded judge when it comes to judging interp overall but there are a few things I look for in performances. Creativity and honesty will always be the most rewarded in my book because it is why we do what we do at the end of the day. Showcasing your own interpretation, but staying true to the core of the story is important to me. Character development and emotional shifts are super important especially over a digital platform to keeping us engaged with the story and showing us the meaning behind the words. Have fun with the choices you make as long as they are PURPOSEFUL, doing something that distracts rather than enhances makes us lose connection between what is happening in the story.
Speaking/Extemp: Big thing is show your own unique style and approach to speaking because this is what separates you from other. I am a big fan of humor, but PLEASE, I BEG do not make it feel forced or this is just awkward for both of us. In terms of depth of the speech, I like more than just surface level arguments and I want to see you get to the higher end issues and core problems effectively. Structure is important obviously to make sure we can connect all of the ideas and know how you are getting to what you are wanting to. Finally, have variation in your delivery, it is important to showcase the different levels and power of your arguments and statements and so we should feel very engaged with how you are saying and what you are saying.
Worlds School Debate:
School affiliation/s : Northwest High School
Hired (yes/no) : Hired for WSD
High School Affiliation if graduated within last five years (required): Northwest High School
Currently enrolled in college? (required) If yes, affiliation? No
Years Judging/Coaching (required) I have been judging for 5- 6 years.
Years of Experience Judging any Speech/Debate Event (required)
I pretty much started off my first year judging in interp and PF and then slowly incorporated all other forms of debate the following year.
Rounds Judged in World School Debate this year (required): Since August I have judged about 40 world school rounds around Texas.
Check all that apply
__x___I judge WS regularly on the local level
_____I judge WS at national level tournaments
_____I occasionally judge WS Debate
_____I have not judged WS Debate this year but have before
_____I have never judged WS Debate
Rounds judged in other events this year : 75 rounds including PF, LD, Interp, Speaking, and Congress.
Check all that apply
__x__ Congress
_x___ PF
__x__ LD
____ Policy
_x___ Extemp/OO/Info
__x__ DI/HI/Duo/POI
____ I have not judged this year
____ I have not judged before
Have you chaired a WS round before?
I have chaired multiple WS rounds before locally.
What does chairing a round involve?
Chairing a round basically is keeping the round in order and ensuring a productive and efficient debate. The chair is in charge of calling up the speakers, leading the RFD for the panel, making sure people do not ask questions during protected time (which I discuss students should keep their own timer at the beginning so we do not have this issue), and making sure a fair debate is occurring.
How would you describe WS Debate to someone else?
I would describe WSD as a form of debate in which you are arguing ideas and issues to show which side of the motion is the most logical. This is way different than Americanized debate where theory and jargon is utilized more, so it is focusing on the core issues of the debate. Worlds is suppose to make sense to anyone who is listening to the debate and therefore the arguments should make rationale sense to anybody.
What process, if any, do you utilize to take notes in debate?
I am fortunate enough to have a full setup for my computer. I have two monitors and on the main monitor I watch the debate, and the second monitor has my tabroom ballot where I am writing notes over each speech and speaker. I also in front of me use a notebook to flow the debate to make sure I keep up with what is being said in the round.
When evaluating the round, assuming both principle and practical arguments are advanced through the 3rd and Reply speeches, do you prefer one over the other? Explain.
This just simply depends on the topic itself. I am pretty open minded when it comes to arguments and do not have a personal preference as long as it is discussed why you chose what to advocate for. This clarity is needed to really emphasize why that approached is needed and it's on the debaters to tell me why it is preferable.
The WS Debate format requires the judge to consider both Content and Style as 40% each of the speaker’s overall score, while Strategy is 20%. How do you evaluate a speaker’s strategy?
I think strategy usually is overlooked in terms of how you want structure arguments. A speaker's strategy is how do you connect the claims you present and how you word things in order to be effective in elaborating on arguments presented by the other side. Picking the right way to argue things and how you say it are definitely things to be aware of for your strategy.
WS Debate is supposed to be delivered at a conversational pace. What category would you deduct points in if the speaker was going too fast?
First, I am glad to have not judged a WSD where someone was spreading, so let's keep it that way hopefully. If someone is just not effective with their speed and tone I usually deduct points from their style.
WS Debate does not require evidence/cards to be read in the round. How do you evaluate competing claims if there is no evidence to read?
As silly as it may sound, I usually vote on simply what makes sense. Since we do not have to have the 20 minutes of calling for cards (thankfully), I simply view whos reasoning and rationale makes the most sense towards the topic and arguments presented in the round. Show me your thought process through your speech and it usually comes down to who can prove their claims in a clear manner, rather than the throw everything at the wall and see what sticks strategy.
How do you evaluate models vs. countermodels?
I look at how effective and clear some model is to make sure it sets the foundation for your ideas. Make sure you think through your model to answer any potential questions individuals may have about it. I do not think all motions need a model or countermodel, so just make sure if you use one there is a purpose to it.
I am a parent judge.
I am a new parent judge
No spreading
Be polite
I am a parent judge. I value clarity in logic and structure, and confidence in your delivery.
Simply put, speak so that I may understand you clearly.
--Speech--
What are your stylistic preferences for extemp? I enjoy the traditional format of extemp speeches, but prefer them to be as conversational as possible. if you're going to have a standard opener that you use religiously, be sure it makes sense. also be sure it isn't the exact same as every other person on your team. Use what YOU know and lean into that so that conversation flows naturally.
How much evidence do you prefer? quality over quantity for me. cite your sources with the date included, and use varied sources. at least 3 different ones! and make sure if you're bluffing that i can't tell you're bluffing.
Any preference for virtual delivery? acknowledge the camera if we're competing virtually! make sure you are in a space where you can be seen and heard.
What are your stylistic preferences for Oratory/Info? CONVERSATIONAL. Do not make it seem like this is the umteenth time you've competed with this piece. The beauty of oratory/info is that this is, or should be, your passion piece! YOU wrote every word. and if you're going to speak on something for 10 minutes over and over again, you should love it. And no matter how many times you've run it, it should feel like the first time every time. Your topic is near and dear to you and it's your job to make it near and dear to us. Universality is key. Though I may not be a part of the community or group or conversation, I need to understand why i MUST become a part of it or aware of it. Your passion and excitement for your speech should be palpable. Make it feel like the first time every time because for most people in the room it is the very first time we've gotten to hear this speech. and you have ten minutes to use this room as your platform and speak on what's important to you. make sure we leave this room talking about YOU! Your goal should be for us to be at our family dinner table telling everyone who will listen about this moment we took away from your speech. your gestures need to make sense and be natural. do not simply fall into gestures that you see being done just for the sake of doing them. if you wouldn't normally use particular hand gestures or vocal variations DONT DO IT for the sake of a round.
How much evidence do you prefer? I need enough statistics to not feel like you're just giving me your own personal think tank. back up what you're saying with multiple different credible sources. offer viewpoints that challenge yours, and then back them up with your facts.
Any unique thoughts on teasers? Your teaser sets the tone for the entire piece. Think about how you want to introduce us to the next ten minutes that we are going to watch!
Any unique thoughts on introductions for Interpretation events? Make them personal to YOU! Tell me why this piece matters to you while also telling me about the piece. What qualifies you to speak on this? Why should we listen and care? If you don't know who/what you're speaking on don't waste your time. oftentimes we are lifting up and bringing awareness to a community or an issue that is very delicate. use your intro to tell us why you're doing this and why it matters. Even in HI!!! i LOOOOVE a good tie in to real life. leave us talking about what we learned regardless of whether we are laughing, crying, or everything in between. take me on a JOURNEY.
Any preferences with respect to blocking, movement, etc: Make every movement a moment. I should be able to snap a photo of you and tell what you're doing and where you are. make movements and pantomimes intentional and thoughtful. break the mold! take me somewhere I've never been.
What are your thoughts on character work? you absolutely must BECOME your character. you need to study people who have experienced what your character has experienced. embody them wholly. whether it's in a humorous or serious way. do not halfway commit to something and expect us to buy in.
How do you feel about author's intent and appropriateness of a piece? For example: an HI of Miracle Worker (author's intent) or a student performing mature material or using curse words (appropriateness)? Author’s intent- doesn’t bother me too much. Appropriateness is BIG for me. You’re in HIGH SCHOOL- crude sexual humor and excessive cusswords just aren’t necessary. It’s also cheap comedy IMO. If you’re that “mature” aim higher for your content. A few innuendos are okay, but don't get crazy. There are far more ways to get laughs then to take it literally below the belt.
Treat me like a lay judge, so please don't spread-if I'm a bit slow, please bear with me
I'd prefer if you didn't run theory shells or Ks, but if you choose to do so, please explain in depth.
Racism, sexism, homophobia, or rudeness/bigotry of any kind will result in 0 speaks and an auto loss
Tech > truth, but keep your arguments sensible
I encourage you to share your case document (PDF format) with me at r_prasanna@yahoo.com
Speak Loud and clear.. Have fun debating!
The contest should be judged on the merits of the respective arguments regardless of a judge's personal beliefs or view point.
Howdy y'all!
My name is Matthew and I'm a current freshman at UT Austin (Hook 'em!). I primarily did Info and OO but I also have experience in Impromptu, Extemp, Congress, and Prose (don't ask...). I reached semis at TFA State and Berkeley, broke at NIETOC, and qualified for TOC and Nationals.
Public Address Events:
Extemp:
The biggest thing I'm looking for is for you to answer the question. Make sure that your speech is balanced so that you're providing roughly the same amount of evidence and analysis for each main point. Also, even in an event like extemp, don't be afraid to be yourself! Letting your personality shine through and adding humor (in your intro, transitions, etc.) are great ways to make yourself stand out in a round!
Info/OO:
These are the primary events I competed in throughout my career and also my favorite to watch! The most important thing I want to see is you having fun. These are the events that I feel allow for the most creativity + expression and I really want that to shine through. Chances are if you're enjoying it, then I will too! For OO specifically, I'd really like to see a personal connection to your topic. By the end of your performance, I should have a good understanding of why YOU chose this topic to deliver a 10-minute speech on. You can structure your speech however you'd like but at some point, I would like to see you address the problem, its causes, effects, and solutions. Make sure that your solutions are realistic and manageable. For info, I don't really have anything that I'm specifically looking for. You have so much liberty in the topic you choose, the way you structure your speech, and how you deliver it. Just ensure that by the end I'm leaving having learned at least one new piece of information. Visuals are definitely not required but if you do have them I appreciate quality over quantity. They should be clean and actually add value to your speech. Similar to extemp, in both of these events, I'd appreciate appropriate use of humor and seeing your personality through your presentation.
Interp
I don't have a ton of experience in interp but I was surrounded by some very talented performers in high school. To quote one of my old coaches: "My overarching philosophy with all interp is that as a performer, you are baking a cake. The three main ingredients of this cake are "characters," "emotion," and "story." Everything else - blocking, accents, how your intro is written, suitability of subject material, author's intent, humor - is icing on that cake. Not totally unimportant - just not the first thing I think about when I'm deciding whether or not I liked it." I don't have any partiality towards piece selection, just make sure you're being authentic. Remember that these are real people's stories you are telling.
Debate
I’m lay. Please don’t spread. I don’t really understand theory.
Congress:
Speaking = 60%
Content = 40%
I'd rather you not give a speech than completely rehash a previous representative's points. Every speech after the first cycle should have clash. The sponsor should outline the problem in the status quo and then refer back to specific parts of the piece of legislation. Negation speakers should be proving net harms, not just saying the bill won't do anything. POs will probably end up in the 3-6 range.
I am a parent judge - I judge speech, not debate.
SHS in Oct 2023 will be my second tournament judging; my first was Grapevine, where I judged POI, DI, FX and DX.
I will endeavor to provide as much feedback as I can, so I will likely be typing a lot while you speak...
Howdy, I'm Hunter Sharp my experience as a competitor is I did Congressional and Extemporaneous debate for 4 years in high school, and am currently on the UNT debate team in Extemporaneous and Persuasive.
Congress Paradigm:
Speakers- I focus more on content than delivery. Clash, crystals and questioning is my favorite please do it. I expect at minimum 2 sources (publisher, month, year) per point. Please avoid repeating arguments and if you're a late speaker I expect crystal.
POs- The smoother you run things the better. keep minimum down time and good order.
Extemp Paradigm:
2 sources per point minimum (publisher, month, year). I care more about content than delivery. Make sure that you connect everything back to the question.
UCLA '24
I debated policy for four years at Lovejoy High School, in Lucas, Texas.
General Things
- I much prefer a CP/DA debate over a K debate, but you do you.
- Speed is fine as long as you're clear.
- Tech > Truth
- I don't keep up with topics so don't assume I know much about all topic-related jargon/acronyms.
If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask.
In terms of debate, I like to see arguments that flow throughout the entire round. I look for organization in both speeches and rebuttals. I'm fairly relaxed in terms of what arguments are brought to the table. Have fun with it, and convince me.
In limited preps, I love organization, the use of proper citations, and a solid job of explaining your point to me, rather than just "talking" at me.
In platform events, I look for organization mostly. Is your speech easy to follow? Do you provide justification? Do you bring an interesting spin to the topic? Are your implications believable?
In interp events, I look for believability. I also look at the argument that is being presented.
Coaching History:
Mansfield Legacy [2023-Present]
Byron Nelson High School (2018-2021)
Royse City High School (2013-2018; 2021-2023)
Email: matthewstewart@misdmail.org (do please include me in any email chains)
General Preferences [updated as of 3/14/24]:
Theory
More truth over tech. If you're real big on theory, I'm not your judge because I'm definitely gonna goof up that flow.
Disclosure:
Don't run it. I think open source is good and should be the standard, but I don't care for it being used as an argument to smash small schools without prep.
Framework:
Default offense/defense if I don't have a framework to work with. Winning framing doesn't mean you win the round, you still need to leverage it for your offense.
Speed:
Whatever you AND your opponent are okay with! Speed shouldn't be a barrier to debate. Slow up for Taglines/Cites, give me a filler word ("and," "next," etc.) to let me know when you're moving to the next piece on the flow and be sure to give me some pen time on Theory/Topicality shells.
Round Conduct:
Don't be sketchy, rude, or hostile to judges or your opponents! We're all here to learn and grow academically, remember that.
Speaker Points:
Starts at 27 and goes up based on strategy, delivery style, and round conduct. Sub 27 means you most likely said something unabashedly offensive or were just generally hostile towards your opponents.
Miscellaneous Stuff
-Debate what you want to debate, I would rather try to meet you on your side of what debate is rather than enforce norms on you. BUT that doesn't mean you can get away with making unwarranted arguments or not doing extensions, impacts, or weighing like a good debater should!
-Open CX and Flex prep are cool with me, but I will respect the norms of the circuit I am judging in.
-I'm pretty non-verbal as I'm flowing and listening, so for better or worse that's gonna be there.
-Just be chill. Debate the way that is most comfortable for you...hopefully that isn't a really yelly and rude style because I'd prefer you not. Respect each other, do your thing, and we'll all have a good time!
-A roadmap is just telling me what order to put my flowsheets in. No more. No less.
-Be kind to novices, be the support you wish you had when you first started. Bonus points for treating newbies nice.
-Extending specific warrants WITH your cards is good, so is doing evidence comparison and impacting out drops
-The less work you do on telling me how to evaluate the round, the riskier it gets for your ballot. Don't assume we're both on the same flow page or that I can read your mind.
-Sending the doc or speech is part of prep time. I will not stop prep until the doc is sent.
General
Hey everyone! My name is Abhiram Tadepalli. I competed in Public Forum Debate throughout high school (Frisco Cen10) and am currently a Freshman at UT Dallas.
For debates, I generally prefer true arguments or stances. However, the most important aspect of debate for me is reasoning. So any clash focusing on the warranting is enjoyable for me.
Speeches/presentations that grab my attention involve imagery, relatable anecdotes, and an engaging story/underlying theme. Topics that I am not familiar with can easily become my most favorite speeches depending on how you guide me through your reasoning.
Note:
- Don’t ever insult or demean a person
-
Be yourself
-
Don’t take advantage of negligence (have integrity)
-
Be willing to change your perspectives
-
Have fun!
--- Congress
-
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos are what I want to see. People who use all of these will be ranked higher
-
Make sure that you present new arguments and move the debate forward
-
Any repetitive arguments/motions may result in a lower score
-
Logically presenting your arguments is important, and therefore will be given a higher rank.
-
The Claim-Warrant-Impact structure may help with this
-
I want to see Clash. This is really important!
-
Make sure you Refute arguments and respond to refutations on your speech
-
While you don’t have to be perfect, your presentation should be professional
-
Modulate your voice to emphasize points
-
Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
-
Presiding Officer
-
Make sure the debate moves smoothly. I will judge you based on the way the debate runs
General (All speech Events)
-
Make eye contact
-
Hand Gestures aid your speech (Highly Recommended)
-
Don’t Fidget
If you have any questions, email me: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
--- PF/LD
*If you have any questions about my paradigm or terminology, let me know when you join the round.*
I would consider myself a flay judge, meaning I won’t buy any outlandish arguments, but I try to not interfere with the warranting of arguments.
Speed is okay, but don’t spread. That being said, if your opponents or I can’t understand you, you may not have the highest speaker points. ENUNCIATE!
Here’s a breakdown of my paradigm speech-by-speech.
Constructive
-
Make sure you follow a Claim-Warrant-Impact structure. WARRANTING is important
Crossfire
-
Be respectful
-
Answer the question. Don’t avoid it
-
Crossfire IS important, but I will not flow it or consider it in my ballot unless you bring it up in a later speech
Rebuttal
-
(For good speaker points) let me know what argument you are responding to. Implicate every response by telling me what your response does to their argument
-
Show clear CLASH. Respond/Frontline to their arguments
Summary
-
You have 3 minutes, so make sure you frontline, extend, AND weigh
-
Frontline = responding to responses on your case
-
Extend = reiterate your argument that you are going for
-
Weigh = compare you argument/impacts to their impacts and tell me why I should prefer your impacts.
-
This shows CLASH that is essential to debate
-
If you don’t weigh (comparatively), I will be forced to do my own weighing
-
I consider defense as sticky (meaning even if you don’t bring up the response in summary, as long as it is conceded by the other team, I will factor that into my evaluation)
-
However, it is a good practice to at least mention that defense
-
No new responses in 2nd summary will be evaluated. 1st summary can and SHOULD frontline
Final Focus
-
This speech should pretty much be a SparkNotes version of your partner’s summary speech. Weighing is the most important here.
-
Compare your weighing to your partner’s weighing.
Finally, Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
If the tournament/time allows I’ll disclose RFDs in-round, but if I can’t then let me know if you have any questions after you get my RFD: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
--- Oratory
-
Having the basic structure of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos goes a long way in my ballot
-
Your speech should persuade me to support your thesis. You can do this by adding humor, analogies, etc to convey your point and convince me. Having a unique take on a topic may also help.
-
A strong thesis and a relevant topic also help.
-
Use Facial expressions, modulating tone, and gestures to show your passion for the topic and its importance.
-
These will increase your rank
-
How am I impacted by this issue?
-
Make sure you convey this. Otherwise, I won’t resonate with your topic
General (All speech Events)
-
Make eye contact
-
Hand Gestures will aid your speech (Highly Recommended)
-
Don’t Fidget
-
Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
If you have any questions about my feedback, email me here: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
--- Informative
-
Pick whichever topic you feel passionate educating others about. If a topic is unique and interesting, it sets a threshold for the other competitors!
-
Establish your thesis early on and make sure you keep referring to it, as your speech will be long and I may forget it
-
Your job as an informative speaker is to inform. Don’t try to persuade me.
-
To inform, you have to engage your audience (me), so m a y b e sprinkle in some humor, or try to connect with the audience in your speech.
-
No bonus points for just having a visual aid, but it can help you earn some of those ‘engagement’ points
-
Overall, make sure your speech is memorable.
General (All speech Events)
-
Make eye contact
-
Hand Gestures aid your speech (Highly Recommended)
-
Don’t Fidget
-
Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
If you have any questions about my feedback, email me here: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
--- Extemp
-
Your speech should have some form of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos to persuade the audience
-
Organize your speech to address key points for your topic and follow that order
-
ANSWER THE QUESTION
-
Choose good sources and cite them
-
Using uncredible/outdated/non-related sources is bad
-
Modulate your voice and use hand gestures to show the importance
-
Most importantly: Grab my attention! The earlier you grab it, the better I will understand your speech. But don’t lose me along the way!
General (All speech Events)
-
Make eye contact
-
Hand Gestures aid your speech (Highly Recommended)
-
Don’t Fidget
-
Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
If you have any questions about my feedback, email me here: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
--- Interp
-
I love stories!
-
Your presentation does not have to be over-the-top, but it should be real.
-
Your goal is to make me remember the best parts of your Interp/Program when I am ranking everyone.
-
You can do this by adding humor, anecdotes, etc to convey the “theme” or meaning. Having a unique aspect to your presentation may also help
-
Be clear on what you want me to remember through pacing, tone, and emphasis.
-
Use Facial expressions, modulating tone, and gestures to show the importance of certain moments
-
What interests me
-
Marvel, Soccer, Mythology, Technology, Education, the Future
-
But anything flies as long as you are respectful and grab my attention
General (All speech Events)
-
Make eye contact
-
Hand Gestures will aid your speech (Highly Recommended)
-
Don’t be superfluous
-
Believe in yourself. Don’t apologize for mistakes. We all make them. You got this!
If you have any questions about my feedback, email me here: abhiram.tadepalli.22@gmail.com
---
tl;dr: Believe in yourself. Follow the basics. Be genuine. Have fun.
I am a new assistant coach at Jordan High School. This is my first year coaching in Speech and Debate. I competed in high school all 4 years and judged some tournaments in college.
I like to judge oratory, domestic and international extemporaneous, and prose events. I like to judge Congress as well but I am new to the event.
I believe a well-delivered speech is organized, and concise. State your arguments clearly and defend them with analysis. Making general comments and not backing them up does not earn points with me. I look for a clear thesis or introduction and entertainment value. I also like to see changes in tone, volume variation and facial expressions that will engage the audience. The use of hand gestures and movement is also helpful in your presentation.
Congress: I like a clear road map of what you will cover for each speech. It is important that you argue your opponent's case and explain how your case is stronger. If your speech is earlier in the session, you should emphasize your key points in your speech. If your speech is later in the session, spend more time explaining how your case is stronger than the opposing side. Emphasize how your key points clearly outweigh the opponents.
Hi! IE's were my primary events during my two years of high school debate. I've competed on the local, state, and national level. There is neither place nor purpose for hate or discrimination of any kind in a round!
Extemp: "I do find that there's a fine balance between preparation and seeing what happens naturally."
-Timothée Chalamet
Include: at least 7 real sources, substructure, and an AGD that actually AG's
Oratory: "Think globally, act locally." -Paul McCartney
Avoid unrealistic solutions. Please make sure that your solution is both tangible and effective.
Informative: "It's not about perfection. It's about purpose." -Beyoncé
If a board falls down, don't worry! I am looking for overall presentation and style. Visuals should be neat.
Debate: " :( " -Nadia Turner
My extensive tenure includes a hand full of novice level tournaments and a few traditional varsity ones. I'm somewhere between lay and flay. Spreading is fine if understandable.
IEs
Please keep in mind that I am a parent judge. I will judge your speech on clarity, style, presentation, and content. Please be respectful and have fun!
Primarily a Congress/Extemp/Worlds judge.
Worlds- strategy is a big part of the game: what are you arguing and why? Find a framework/voting issues/whatever you're calling it and link arguments into the framework. Many debates come down to what the topic actually means and what the framework issues are- so tackle these head on and link your arguments into the framework.
Do a bit of everything- show the logic, weigh the impacts, think about effective delivery. I prefer arguments that are rooted in reality more so than hyperbole. Structure and logic matter a lot- stay organized, hold my hand, walk me down the flow. I like a good line by line debate, but make sure you're linking into the bigger story your team is trying to sell.
In later speeches, think through cohesion. Third constructives with brand new arguments or logic not already laid out by their teammates are likely to do more harm than good for me. Same goes with new substantives in the second constructive: I like them, but leave yourself time to develop them and don't blip them at me with 30 seconds left on the clock.
I love a good POI, but make sure you're asking something that matters and answer the question you were asked. Quality over quantity rules the day in this regard. Speakers should expect to take some, and questioners should not pepper the speaker with requests. For online debates, I prefer verbal POIs and verbal responses to those POIs (whether you take them now, later, or dismiss them).
Congress- First and foremost, this is a debate event. There should be clash, weighing of arguments, and healthy discourse. Argumentation should be realistic with clear links to the legislation. The later in the debate we go, the more clash is expected. New arguments as the 4th advocacy speech will likely not earn you much headway with me. I am particularly impressed by debaters who can synthesize debate well.
Strategy is a big part of Congress. Giving only refutations or only sponsorships does not show your range as a legislator. Parliamentary procedure should be used to advance debate AND your own interests. Debaters should be prepared to argue both sides of legislation- debaters who do so will never find themselves shut out of debate. Think twice before you volunteer to be the second consecutive speech on a given side of a topic- you're likely doing yourself a disservice. I will notice if multiple opportunities go by for you to get a speech in and you choose not to take it.
Questioning- ask strategic questions. You should be soliciting something from the speaker you can use later on in the debate or to defend points you've already made on the topic. When responding, be brief- don't ramble for the sake of killing time. Avoid leading questions that start with "are you aware" and "did you know"- if you're asking a question you already know the answer to because its fact-based, save it for your speech.
POs- I'm a big fan of an efficient, affable PO. You can absolutely get a 1 from me as the PO. The less I/the parli has to intervene, the better. Be free from bias, keep the room moving, and watch your word economy. Do not be afraid to lead. Use consensus motions to save time (e.g. "seeing no objection, I'll open the floor for docket nominations.") Run the room, don't let the room run you. Feel free to hop into the debate and give a speech if tournament rules allow.
A note on language- this should feel like Congress. I've never heard Chuck Schumer say "I affirm the bill" or Kevin McCarthy say "I stand with the negation." Model congressional behavior, not high school debate norms.
LD/PF- Here are a few things you need to know about me that you're probably not used to:
- All time counts. Either it's a speech or it's prep.
- No, I don't want to be on the email chain.
- This is an oral communication activity, not a read-along.
- Don't waste time, just debate.
- If I want to see the card, I'll ask for it. I probably won't ask for it.
- No, I won't disclose. I wrote you a ballot for you and your coach to read.
I'll vote on anything if you give me a good reason, a clear framework, and weighable impacts. I'm not likely to vote on arguments spurious to the resolution, so please debate the topic as presented. I'm not particularly interested in debates outside the scope of the topic. I do believe strongly that debate should be publicly accessible- while I can handle most arguments, a general audience should be persuaded as well as I am. As much as the line by line matters, it is how you use it to build a compelling narrative to vote for your side that really counts.
Evidence- I'm not normal when it comes to evidence. Just because you have a card doesn't mean the card is gospel. Look for the warrants. Challenge the logic, whether it has cards or not. I do not flow author names- if you say "extend the Warren card", I will have no idea what you're talking about. I very rarely ask to read evidence after the round and I'm ok with paraphrasing evidence as long as the full text is available in round. I have zero tolerance for waiting for evidence to be exchanged- if you're going to use an email chain, use it. Have all of your evidence ready to exchange the moment it is asked for. All time counts- either it's speech time or it's prep time. There's no such thing as 'off time roadmaps' and 'waiting to see the card'.
Speed kills- don't spread. You can go faster than normal conversation, but not by much. This is a communication activity after all.
Extempers- answer the question. That's my primary consideration. Sources are your friend. They should be recent and relevant. Also answer the question. Delivery should be conversational and engaging- show us your personality. Also answer the question. Think about feasibility of arguments. Then answer the question. Don't just tell me that things happened, tell me why things happened. Have I mentioned you should answer the question? Use research that is specific to the topic and shows your ability to access resources- if it's an internet-prep tournament, I expect to hear more than just what a google search pops out as the first five links. Find the good research. Then answer the question.
OO/Info- same as extemp, except replace 'answer the question' with 'defend your thesis'. I prefer OOs with interesting angles on topics and a unique perspective. In Info, I want a 'need to know'- what do you expect me to do with this information? There's a big difference between informative and persuasive: Infos that have call to actions or are describing problems in huge detail implying we should solve them aren't infos. Visual aids in Info should contribute to the understanding of the concept- I don't like VAs that are just for fun/entertainment. Note: VAs are not in fact required. If you don't need them, don't use them.
Interp- crisp, clear characterization matters. I look for continuity/flow in the cutting, believability and relatability in the performance, and a variance in emotion as the piece/cutting builds. The introduction should say something and give me a reason to watch the performance- there should be social significance and an argument laid out. Particularly for POI and program cuttings in Poetry, I'm looking to see if you have an interesting argument and if the lit says what you say it says. I want to see characters that feel real and grow as the piece progresses. Less is more- use all your communicative skills to convey emotion. There are ways to show anger other than yelling, there are ways to show sadness other than screaming.
A Note on Time in Speech Events- prepared events should not require time signals (you should know roughly how long your speech is). I do not believe the grace period is an excuse to add 30 seconds to performances, especially in extemp. I'll give you a couple of seconds leeway as a benefit of the doubt, but if you are clearly abusing the grace period, I will have issues.
Congress:
Don't speed through your speeches, speed matters to me. Style matters to me as well, I am looking for structured arguments with clean rhetoric that comes in a polished package. Introduce new arguments. In questioning, I look for fully answering questions while also furthering your argument. I notice posture and gestures -- and they do matter to me. Evidence should be relevant and (for the most part) recent. Evidence is pretty important to me, and outweighs clean delivery if used properly. A clean analysis will rank you up on my ballot as well. Don't yell at each other. Overall, be respectful of one another. If I don't see respect for your fellow competitors, it can be reflected on my ballot. Don't rehash arguments. An extra speech with something I have already heard that round is likely to bump you down when I go to rank. As far as PO's go, I typically start them at 4 or 5, and they will go up or down depending on how clean the round runs. A clean PO in a room full of really good speakers will likely be ranked lower on my ballot. As far as delivery goes...as it says above, I am a speech coach. Your volume, rate, diction, etc are important. Make sure you are staying engaged and talking to the chamber, not at the chamber -- I want to be able to tell that you care about what you are speaking on.
Speech:
EVERY performance must tell a story.
Extemp: Someone with zero knowledge of your topic prior to the round should be able to walk away from your speech with a basic understanding of your topic and your stance on the issue. You should include a variety of sources, and they should be as current and relevant as possible. I look for organization and structure, but I also like to see some evidence of your personality to keep me engaged. Knowledge of your topic is important, as is rhetoric and logic throughout the speech.
Info: These speeches should be clear and entertaining, and should include concise and organized ideas, thought-provoking takeaways, and interesting, engaging visuals. I will be looking for how well you inform your audience about your topic.
Oratory: Original oratories are a place to share personal experiences, either lived or researched, and should showcase your passion for an idea that matters to you.
HI, DI, Duo, POI: Tell a compelling and meaningful story that can be clearly followed. Acting and blocking should ADD to the performance, not detract from it – remember that drama is not always about crying, shrieking, and falling on the ground. Oftentimes, the best performances utilize pauses and soft spoken words more often than noise to convey emotion.
Prose and Poetry: I was an English teacher before coming to coach Speech and Debate, so I absolutely love listening to prose and poetry. I will evaluate characterization, insight and understanding as far as the mood and meaning of the piece, how clearly themes and ideas are expressed, and overall delivery (aim for distinct enunciation without sounding pedantic).
Final Interp ranks are based on the story, acting, blocking, message, and overall effect of each performance.
hi!
I'm Michael (he/him) and I graduated from Grapevine in Texas and currently attend Northwestern. I primarily competed in INF, EXT, and POI, and also have experience with DI, HI, DUO, DUET, OO, and PR. I've semifinaled at Nationals in Informative, semifinaled at TFA State three times, and received 5th at UIL State in Informative Extemp.
I personally do not need content warnings. However, if you feel more comfortable giving them or you think the round would benefit from one, feel free to give a warning. Your choice will not affect your ranking.
A general note for all events: I strongly believe at its core, Interp and PA events are about giving an original performance about topics or stories that not only you find personally valuable, but have significance beyond your world as well. As such, I am not a fan of pieces or topics that are considered "overdone" or have been on the Nationals final stage recently, especially if you don't put your own unique twist on it. It is also somewhat easy to tell when you're not personally invested in your piece, so find a piece or topic that speaks to you and perform it honestly.
Interp Events (DI, DUO, DUET, HI, PR, PO, POI):
For acting events, I am looking more for an impactful story with a moral, lesson, or personal growth than a techy, flashy performance. No matter what event, I should see a clear exposition with explicit conflict set out and a climax that doesn't feel forced and an appropriate resolution. I want an honest, truthful performance and interpretation of your material with well-developed characters. Draw me into your performance with a fun or interesting teaser. Put an appropriate amount of work into your intro too, it's important!! Give a sense of hope or something to take away at the end. If you're going to clip between characters, create distinct voices, postures, and facials for each one. Have appropriate reactions!
For partner events, if you're going to do cool partner tech, make sure it's clean. Have good tension between the two of you as well as genuine reactions.
For binder events, please hold your binder neatly with proper tech and timing.
Speaking Events (EXT, INF, OO):
First off, have fun! If you're having fun talking, then chances are I will too! Delivery is so important with these events: emphasis, pace, tone, volume, and the like. Are you emphasizing the parts of your speech that need it? Is the tone matching your content? Use silence to your advantage. Content and analysis are equally as important too though. You have only 10 minutes (and 30 seconds) in a round, so why did you choose this specific topic? What is so pressing that you felt the need to craft a speech about it? Make the audience care. Reel us in. Give thoughtful and complex analysis rather than superficial facts. Use humor if it's appropriate! I should be lea
If you're an extemp child, try to ensure your time allotment to your points is balanced and have a structure within your main points (substructure) in addition to the backbone of your speech.
-----
Can't wait to see you in round! :D