TOC Spring Regional Summertime Cup
2023 — Online, CN
General Pool Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideI have been debating and judging competitively for roughly two years and a half across multiple intervarsities and in both national and international tournaments. Much of my experience, especially in adjudication, is centered around British Parliamentary, Asian Parliamentary, World Schools, and Australs formats, although I also have a background in judging other debate formats such as Junior Debate and Public Forum. Regarding what I consider to be effective argumentation, I value the logical soundness of a claim versus evidence that isn’t nuanced and well-integrated into the analysis. This means that I am more likely to be persuaded by sufficiently analyzed arguments over largely assertive material or impacts. Moreover, I strongly value good engagement and willingness to weigh and accept trade offs instead of being insistent on responses. My decisions are based on which team successfully wins the most important voting issues that are usually determined by what teams explicitly or implicitly agree to be important in the round. While I think that style is something that should be holistically assessed with analysis, I definitely appreciate speakers with good clarity and structure that makes it easy to track and credit where appropriate.
Highlight Achievements:
Open Finals Judge, EFL Finals Judge, 30th KIDA National Championship (Korea Spring Nationals 2022)
Open Octofinals Chair, Philippine Intercollegiate Debating Championship 2022 (PH AP Nationals)
Invited Adjudicator, Gold Quarterfinals Judge, Doxbridge World Schools Debating Championship 2022
Judge Philosophies- Daniel Joash Cerrado
- Tell us about your debate judging experience.
-
I have never judged debate before.
-
I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
-
I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
-
I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
-
I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
- Tell us about your debating experience.
-
I have never debated competitively before.
-
I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
-
I debated other formats for less than a year.
-
I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
-
I havedebated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
- What is your speaking speed preference?
-
Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
-
Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
-
TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
-
Fast speed (200+wpm)
- How much do you know about the topic?
-
I coach debate and have researched this topic
-
I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
-
I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
-
I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
-
I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
- Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
-
Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
-
No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
-
I’m not sure.
-
While the second rebuttal speaker is generally responsive to constructive material, engagement with the provided responses is always welcome and helpful.
- How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
-
It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
-
It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
-
It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
-
Other (Please Specify)
- What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
I generally decide debates on the basis of which team wins the most important issue(s) of the round, based on what teams explicitly or implicitly agree to be important in the round.
- Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
I value clear mechanisms, established premises, effective responses, and good engagement and weighing.
1. Judge's Name- Vincent Gaviyao
2. Tell us about your debating experience
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than one year
3. Tell us about your debating experience
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year
4. What I'd your speed preference?
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?
d. I pay attention to this topic, but don't go out of my way to know about it
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker ( frontlining)?
b. No, the second speaker Rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
7. How important is the flow(your notes) in making your decision?
What do you write down in your notes?
a. It's very important, l take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely on my notes
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
portant facts.
I usually decide the winner of the debate based on three speeches rebuttal, crossfires, and summary. As long as you do well in these three speeches, you are guaranteed success.
I usually decide the winner of the speech based on relevance, relatability, and originality. The contestants who show the greatest emphasis on these three sections win the round.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
Lastly, make sure to do your research and prepare extensively before entering the round. Good luck and remember to have fun, everyone!
Judge Philosophies
1. Judge’s Name: Inventor, Luna Yael B.
2. Tell us about your debate judging experience.
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.
a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?
a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?
a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify) Depends on the relevance and the weight of the First Rebuttal speaker’s content—it’s possible to engage with a case and not need to directly respond
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
Engagement and weighing of the overall arguments. Often, debaters can posit good and valid arguments but it often ends in a deadlock. This is usually because there is a lack of a clear outcome, clear goal, or clear trade-off. If a team has two or more of these in their speech, it is very likely that they already have an edge over other teams in the tournament.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you? I have two dachshunds. <3
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rfmY97ya3qhQjttzJs3SVeBA49p1Z48D/edit
BLESSING PETER
My personal debate philosophy.
I believe reserving judgment and taking your time is an essential part of the debate, the ability to use simple logic to refute an opponent’s argument for me is the key
Speech Projection
I have no issues as long as the speech is clear, and does not put too much focus on the number of arguments which will lead to race against time instead focus on quality and emphasis because at the end of the day I can only judge on what I clearly hear no matter how good and confident I am in my flowing skills
My take on aggressiveness
I believe healthy competition comes from respecting each other, they are your opponent, not your enemies, remember, empty vessels make a lot of noise!
How do I usually determine the winner of the debate? Briefly
As aforementioned on the use of logic to refute an opponent’s argument, rebuttal speech for me is one of the most important areas to excel in, gather your main arguments in the summary, you do that you win it
Do all your necessary preparations, and have your evidence ready in place. Don’t second guess your argument, if you do let it be inside don’t show it