Just know what the hell you're talking about and present well and you'll slay!

Debate

I am persuaded by calm, well-thought-out arguments, that flow well within your framework. An over-bearing and/or arrogant demeanor will negatively impact my vote. A good debate is about an exchange between sides. This requires listening, as a good debate is as much about responding to your opponent as it is about solidifying your own arguments.

Speech

I rely heavily on delivery. I look for confidence in the speaker. I am best persuaded by a speaker when they are passionate and engaging. Most of all, however, is I need to see the speaker connected to the speech on some level, whether this be emotional, through body language, and/or through some other means.

And always remember to enjoy yourself!!!

Experience:
Policy debate student- Kearns High 00-03
Debate coach- Juan Diego Catholic High 2011-2022

I'm a progressive LD judge, moderate CX judge. I hate the idea of a judge paradigm. I don't believe my preference should determine what is presented in the round. I am not opposed to particular issues or topics, nor do I prefer certain issues over others.

The expectation for any round is that you present well formed arguments, provide support for your case, and refute your opponents case. I can handle any speed you can deliver, however it is your responsibility to be clear.

I vote strictly off my flow. If you are not clear, I do not flow. I will not tell you to clear up, it is your job to know if you are being an effective communicator. Likewise, if you don't tell me where to flow something (for example, on my opponents second contention), I will flow it straight down -which may not bode well for you.

In any round, you need to give me a reason to prefer you. Impact your arguments. Well formed, quality arguments will be reflected in speaker points.

Clean and clear speech, good tone and pacing will always win the day.

Must make the point clear, Why is the status quo wrong or right. If you have a piece of legislation you have to have a compelling reason why the status quo is not working, i.e. what are the harms.