Last changed on
Mon April 23, 2018 at 7:25 PM EDT
I have been a member of the National Speech and Debate Association for 18 years. I grew up doing speech, and as a teacher, moved more into the direction of coaching debate. I love this activity, and I am genuinely rooting for every team that I judge.
I currently coach a large, successful middle school debate team in Harlem, where we do mostly Parli.
1. I appreciate cases that convey a sense of originality of analysis, clarity, and authenticity.
2. When it comes to any data-based evidence, I am going to be more swayed by the narrative you create around the numbers than the numbers themselves.
3. I appreciate thoughtful research, but when it comes down to it -- perhaps it is all the time I spend coaching Parli -- I am easily pulled into the world of ideas and logic. I will have a longer leash for more philosophical reasoning than many PF judges.
4. Whenever I experience PF debate, I am so impressed by the way the best teams are able to manage their time-- because you have so little to work with. Do not be afraid to let things fade from the round in order to focus the round into the real voting issues.
5. In crossfires, get underneath the premise of your opponent's argument rather than the splitting hairs or (in most cases) getting into the nuances of the validity of the evidences. Force concessions from your opponent.
6. Create legitimate clash. Show me the contrast between the worlds of yours and your opponents. Make the contrast obvious to me.
5. As you speak, engage me naturally on a human-to-human level, and read my reactions. (I'm told I am fairly easy to read)