Sequoyah Spotlight SpeechDramaDebate Tournament
2019
—
Tahlequah,
OK/US
CX Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Isabella Cefalone
Haskell
None
Last changed on
Wed March 6, 2024 at 6:34 AM CDT
I am a policy coach at heart with a stock issues/policy maker blend paradigm. If you point out a card over and over, I will want to see it. I love clash. I love unique links. I love arguments that cross apply. Definitions matter to me. I love impact calculus in PF and CX. Source qualifications are important in all styles of debate. In PF/LD I will want to see the attack and defend, straight down the flow. Also, I love a good BRIEF off time roadmap that is actually followed. Go team.
Last changed on
Tue June 16, 2020 at 4:48 AM CDT
CX-
Stock Issues
Make sure taglines are clear
Do not spread too fast - evidence matters and I need to hear it to understand your case
Do not like topicality arguments-fine to mention if you feel argument is non-topical, however do not waste excessive time and allow judge to determine if the argument is or is not topical.
Do your best to present on case arguments. If Neg ignores the AFF and presents only generic attacks, you will lose points, please debate the AFFs case.
If you run a K or counter plan, make sure you do you fully vet and present your arguments. These options require more convincing.
Prefer you not to go nuclear unless it is necessary.
Preston Patrick
Keys
None
Skyleen Willingham
Okmulgee
None