Flint Hills After School DB8 at Shawnee Hts

2018 — Topeka, KS/US

Cade Blenden (TH) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Trinity Brockman (MAN) Paradigm

Attack the argument, not the debater. As a woman in debate, I have experienced forms of sexism, if I see any of this, you will be voted down. microaggressions, racism, homophobia, or xenophobia will not be tolerated by me. If I encounter this, I will stop flowing and vote you down. CX is a time for understanding, not for coming after the other team. Don’t be a jerk. If you are, you will be voted down. Debate is a place for fun and learning, not for being mean to people for the sake of “winning.”

email: thehangingtree664@gmail.com

she/her/hers

Four years at @ Manhattan High School

Assistant Coach @ Lawrence High

Everything is up for debate.

I am a heavy flow critic. I find myself looking towards the arguments and how they function in the debate over the inherent “truth” of an argument. I will vote on an argument I know is not true (many economy arguments, for example) if this is not refuted. Basically, I am tech over truth in most instances...

However, I will not vote on arguments such as racism good, patriarchy good, transphobia good, ableism good, colonialism good, etc. Give content warnings for graphic content (I will vote you down) If there are any of the aforementioned violence practiced theoretically or materially in round I will vote against your team immediately. These types of injustices kill education and means that no ethical pedagogy can occur. Zero tolerance here. Debate space should be a space to act without fear of oppression - I will make sure that is reflected in my judgments and comments.

I am fine with any speed you choose, you will not go too fast for me. However, do not spread just to push the other team out. That is an accessibility issue and if they are pushed out of the round and make an abuse argument or criticism of your practices I will most likely vote against you. I see way too many debaters push other teams out just because they think they are better than the other team. Don't be a dick.

Topicality: I love it. A good T debate is my favorite debate to judge and was my favorite argument to run. T is always a voter because it taps into the performative aspects of debate and how this education can be effective. They are always about competing interpretations and the reasons as to why that interpretation is more beneficial than others. You must weigh the offense based on your standards/voters vs. the C/I and their subsequent standards/voters. You have to win your interpretation is the best for the debate. This applies to all theory arguments.

***Topicality is just an agreement between two teams on what is to be debated.*** If there is/are more pertinent issue(s) that the teams wish to discuss (e.g. anti-blackness, transphobia, colonialism, ableism) of a particular event that is proximal to the debaters then that is okay. Do not think you are stuck to the topic if there is a general consensus on what should be debated.

Counterplans: Read one, please. If you don’t, you need status quo solves. If you read a perm text, please give SOME explanation on how the perm functions. I don’t view perms as advocacies (no one does anymore) because the CP is just opportunity cost to the affirmative, so don’t act like you suddenly have an amazing new net-benefit because you permutated the CP. Presumption never flips aff. Presumption, simply put, is that the existing state of affairs, policies, programs should continue unless adequate reasons are given for change. I believe condo is good, I'm going to have a hard time listening to anything else.

Criticisms/Performances: I do run Ks as a debater. (I have argued neolib, cap, security, fem, gender, set col, and queer kritiks) It should be an advocacy. Additionally, I do not think white debaters should run anti-blackness. I do not think non-queer individuals should run queer theory. This runs the line of commodification and you cannot work within that position if you do not belong to it, meaning that you will never truly understand what you are running and operating form a position of privilege to do so. I am okay with whatever criticism or performance you so choose to run, just make sure you can explain it and how it solves the aff.

Case: haha you should do it, literally aff's are so bad and not well designed anymore. I could have lost on presumption so many times my senior year but people are too afraid to give that 2NR. If that is your best 2nr option, do it.

***BOTTOM LINE***

It is much more important to me that you find an educational gain from this activity and adequately express the things you care about greatly than hitting all the stock issues or being a policy maker. Debate is about the debaters, make the round what you want. ANY attempt to push the other team out of the debate will result in a dropped ballot.

fiat is fake and the debate round should be ethically and strategically centered in the contact between the bodies in the space (me and the debaters). that doesn't mean i don't buy your ptx da or shady i/l link chain, but that i want to see a politely conducted, complex debate with four people who know a lot more about what they are talking about than me. at the end of the day, we all leave the round and what we take away from it is knowledge, empathy and experience. if you prove to me that you are best for the production of those three things in this space, then it is likely you have won.

Any other questions just find me and ask.

Crysteen Brown (MAN) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Juliana Caballero (TW) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Irene Caracioni (TH) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Isabella Carter (HP) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Alivia Cook (WR1) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Hayley Cruce (TW) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Katie Davis (Emp) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Kallee Del Biaggio (WR3) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Ethan Dozier (JC) Paradigm

CX:

Topicality is a voting issue but it needs voters. No voter= no reason to vote on it

Cross-ex: Be polite i.e. don't yell at each other

Run arguments you know how to run don't try an arg you don't understand.

for spreading don't slur or go so fast i cant understand or I won't flow it

Sam Feleay (Sea A) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Eli Friedli (WR3) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Maddie Gates (Hay) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Tyler Harwood (Sea B) Paradigm

Not Submitted

KJ Jones (MAN) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Lylah Keyes (SHHS) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Kashif Khan (WR3) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Teagan Kress (Sea A) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Anthony Lake (SHHS) Paradigm

8 rounds

Not Submitted

Eadon Marstall (MAN) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Molly McClimans (Sea B) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Harley McWilliams (WR4) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Logan Michael (WR2) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Bo Miller (SHHS) Paradigm

8 rounds

Not Submitted

Mary Morrison (Sea B) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Lena Mose (Emp) Paradigm

emporia high school 2015-2019

ku 23

they/them

yes add me to your email chain: itslenamose@gmail.com

about me

i did policy debate for all four years of high school and a semester of college debate at KU. i ran mostly policy arguments in high school but i spent most of my time running Ks and K affs my last year and a half in debate.

high school experience = two time DCI qualifier, 5A two speak policy debate finalist, and two time NCFL qualifier in LD.

yes spread. yes be clear.

top level

i will listen to most of what you have to say. here's what i think is super important/things people mess up a lot:

1. win your aff -- case is super important and if you win it, then you can win a lot of other stuff on the flow (like case o/w and using the aff as an impact filter)

2. engage with arguments and understand your arguments -- shadow extending cards/making claims with no warrants does not persuade me. clash is good.

3. good cx -- a lot of people don't have goal oriented cross examinations anymore and it's pretty sad. cross ex is a speech. you can get a lot from cx, and when you do you should point those things out in your speeches.

4. impact calc -- do impact calc. often times debaters don't do good enough impact calc and it becomes difficult for me to judge debates. probability, magnitude, and timeframe are important things and you should talk about them. doing impact calc is what will help you write out the ballot for me.

T

i default to competing interps unless convinced otherwise. i will vote on T and i enjoy t debates. limits is probably the only convincing impact to T. obviously warrant out fairness and education claims, but if you don't talk about limits in your 2nr it will be easier for me to vote aff.

theory

theory debates are pretty cool. i'm familiar with condo debates. if you wanna go for it, go for it. please go slow on theory though, spreading at top speed on theory will become frustrating for me.

disads

love a good disad debate ngl. if you can give me a good story and do some good line by line AND win impact calc, then you have a good shot with most DAs.

K

i like K debates. these are probably some of my favorite debates to judge. as long as you can explain your K and it isn't some death good stuff then i can evaluate it. but for reference, i ran queer theory, cap, and latinx theory in high school so I'm most familiar with those arguments however I am also pretty familiar w/set col and fem ir. perm debates on the K are fun and good overviews are also fun.

i also like good alts. alts that are specific and well explained will def boost speaks

CP

i like creative CPs and just any CP that tests the aff well. CPs are good and should be competitive. please understand your perms.

Tyler Moser (Sea A) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Xavier Ralston (Emp) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Andrew Rea (TH) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Keaton Rosenbaum (WR2) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Aaron Schifman (WR1) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Sam Strecker (Hay) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Anna Swift (WR1) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Jordan Teufel (WR2) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Terrell Wallace (WR4) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Madison Warner (WR4) Paradigm

Not Submitted

Colby West (JC) Paradigm

8 rounds

Not Submitted

Peyton Woods (MAN) Paradigm

Not Submitted