Hello, my name is Wayne Barnum

I’ve done speech and debate for 4+ years now competing in LD, PF, IX, OO, and CX. I actively coach for my middle school team and a number of individual students in my state of Alaska.

In terms of how I judge debate rounds, I’ll emphasis one point, MAKE THINGS CLEAR! I very much prefer having debate centered around clash over anything but I understand how the nature of debate is different from each person. Offense > Defense for me generally is prefered.

Both Lay and Tech are acceptable, but I will say that my expertise in more Tech concepts (theory/kritik) is fairly limited. I absolutely advocate for using these tools but I have to ask that if you do intend to use them, treat me like a toddler who has no understanding on anything ever.

I more prefer oral feedback but I’ll try to give some in tab as well

Enjoy your rounds!

Hello there, everyone!

My name is AmandaLesly Miranda, and I am a debater from Wildwood, Florida. I am a debate alum, three-time Nationals Qualifier for World School Debate, and I do mostly debate events. I want to ensure that my judgment is good enough for you and that your expectations are met and hopefully exceeded. There is no need for a debater to be worried about who their judge is and what their qualifications are, so hopefully these qualifications are good enough for you.

For my judging, I always like to go based on the rules, but I will also add my personal opinion. My opinion does not affect your score unless there is a tie, and then I will consult myself to see which one I liked more and which I felt met the standards in a better way, however, I have yet to encounter a tie. If there are any discrepancies with my judgment, I always want to improve, and I will happily take feedback.

For clarification, I wanted to specify what I look for in rounds. For any event, regardless if it's a debate or speech event, I look for appeal during your speech. Whether it's appealing to your judges, audience, or competitor, or appealing to the story that you're saying, you want to keep everyone engaged during your performance.

When it comes to interpretation events, I like to see the fluidness of your speech. Of course, you may stumble or stutter, and I personally don't judge too harshly for this unless it's excessive. But, memorization of the speech, long pauses during its delivery, etc. will definitely affect your score in my eyes. I'm also looking heavily at its delivery, such as speaking tone, speed, and interaction. For me, eye contact is a huge portion, as it gives you a connection to your audience, but I would definitely let it slide if eye contacttechnicallydoesn't fit into your piece. Other than that, I stick with the other general rules given by the NSDA.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, concerns, or anything else about my judging, there are two ways to reach me: Skimmy425@gmail.com (Primary email) and Mandawritesall@gmail.com (Work/Secondary email).

Thank you, and good luck!

Hey, I'm Paul, a rising senior at Stratford High School. I mainly compete in Extemp, and have finaled at UIL State twice, quartered the UT Longhorn in USX, and quartered TFA State in IX. I am the deputy Editor in Chief at the Equality in Forensics Red Folder, a news source geared towards competitors (aka I read the news). I also have some experience in Oratory.

Debate:

• Consider me a truth judge, as I will not look favorably on arguments that are not backed up properly. I like to see interesting takes on topics, but ones that can reasonably be backed up in reality.
• I can flow pretty fast. Take that how you will.

Oratory/Info:

For PA events other than Extemp, I generally tend to give equal weight to delivery and writing. I like a polished speech, but I want to see the humanity in it; I should be able to tell why you picked this topic over anything else you could have done.

In Oratory specifically, I need solutions. These solutions should be relevant to your topic and towards your audience. As far as I'm concerned, an Oratory without solutions is pointless.

Congress:

I have some experience in Congress, so I know what the event is supposed to look like, and what it is not. I absolutely abhor the toxic culture that seems to be prevalent which advances being rude and bullying people in order to show "dominance". I value unique arguments, and don't like seeing rehash. Again, please be nice, especially in questioning.

Extemp:

In Extemp, I definitely value analysis over delivery, although delivery is important and I will take that into account. I like to see structure, and your substructure across all three points should be the same (unified analysis) except in VERY rare circumstances (ie super complex court or econ topics).

I almost act as a cross examiner when watching speeches, trying to find weak areas and how you address them. I like to see logical arguments that flow nicely which I have a hard time poking holes in them. I'd actually advise trying this in prep: think about the questions a cross examiner could ask, and address them so that the logic is more sound.

Speaking of cross examination, be nice. I don't particularly like seeing the more "Congressy" style of cross. Although you should obviously strive to ask good questions, and I will reward you if you do, you should ask them politely; cross should look a lot more like an news interview of an expert than a cheap TV show's version of a courtroom.

As for AGDs, I don't value them that highly. What I mean by this is not to refrain from having them, but I would rather not see one than a bad one. They should be clearly linked to your topic, and look like something that is applicable to this speech, not just a device you pull out every time you get a question with the word Nigeria in it.

I do not like canned or inappropriate AGDs, and while I usually won't give it an automatic 6, I will definitely down you for it. In addition, AGDs stolen from NSDA finals are not something you should be using; everyone has seen those, and everyone will know you are fine with plagiarism. This doesn't go so much for ideas that are so widely used that they are in the "public domain" per se, but you should be able to come up with something about it that is unique to you; I don't like canned punchlines.

Interp:

Please don't let me be your Interp judge. I have absolutely no experience, and don't like the event. If that fails, I would like to see clear character transitions (in HI especially), energy that doesn't look too rehearsed, and vocal variety (ie don't just yell at me for ten minutes, have levels). Otherwise, consider me a lay judge.

In all events, DO NOT USE YOUR PHONE IN ROUND. I will drop you to the heaviest extent possible that I can in the event, as will most other judges.