Hi! Please add me on the email chain at isaura09m@gmail.com

You can Be Aggressive but make sure to Be Respectful

TECH>>>>>>TRUTH

organization and judge instruction are quite important

Good luck!

Hi, when debating please be respectful

Sign-post

Try not to take too long sending emails

Have fun!

To add me to an email chain:

Use "evmaster2010@gmail.com"

hi my name is daniel my email is greeninyellow@gmail.com

im a novice policy debater for peninsula high school

1. sign post and don’t get off track so that my flowing is easier

2. Clarity > speed

3. Tech > truth

4. Clash is good

5. Extend Ks and Ts properly

6. Do not eat while giving speech

extras

will not take prep time for sending documents under 2 minutes

dont yap debate jargain without a reason for why you're saying it

be respectful to your own team and others

Policy debater at Peninsula High School

Add me to email chain at rileyvmeagher@gmail.com

General notes

- Speed/spreading is fine but prioritize clarity. If I can’t understand you, I can’t flow your arguments.

- Judge instruction and impact calc will go a long way.

- Quality > Quanity: take time to articulate your best points and be persuasive. Don’t rely on shallow, dropped arguments.

- I want to see that you understand your argument and can confidently defend/extend it (especially in cross). Don’t read something you don’t understand.

- Open cross-x is fine if both teams consent

- Tech > Truth

- Be respectful. You should enjoy debating- don't make it stressful or a bad experience. Please don’t be rude to your opponents (or your partner) and avoid saying anything racist/sexist/homophobic.

Specifics

[Affs] Know your case. Explain why the aff matters, why it is necessary, and what impacts I should prioritize.

- - -

[DAs] IMPACT CALC. Why do your impacts outweigh the aff’s? Time frame, probability, magnitude, etc.

- - -

[CPs] How is the CP better than the plan? Provide strong evidence that they are mutually exclusive or I may be persuaded by a perm + net benefit argument.

:D

Hello, my name is Michelle Park and I am currently a policy debater at Peninsula High School.

michellepj31@gmail.com

tech over truth

Yes to spreading but be sure to have some clarity

Cross-x: Tag teaming during cross is fine (with all the teams consent) but please allow your partner to answer the questions.

You got this !!

Peninsula 28

I am a novice policy debater

Preferences:

As a judge I would like to have the least impact on the debate possible.

If you want to run a T shell or a K aff, just prove to my why it is a decent argument and I will be fine with it.

Please treat the constructives as you bringing your arguments into the debate. Treat the rebuttals as directly speaking to me as to why you win.

I'll be on the more generous side in terms of speaks.

I'm fine with spreading if its clear, but if its an unreasonable number of offcases and Aff reads Condo, I will heavily evaluate it.

Do an impact calc

Non-negotiables:

Please don't spread analytics

No-clipping, if you have to just cut the card

Sign post

Call drops

Sending the doc doesn't count as prep, unless its obvious you are stealing prep.

Please develop arguments with warrants, I won't evaluate arguments without warrants well.

Cross-ex is binding

please don't hide theory

Clash is good for debates

Good Luck Everyone

Put me on the email chain ayanuppal22@gmail.com

I am a policy debater class of ‘28 for peninsula

Tech>Truth

Case Turns are good

Don't spread your analytics or blocks, at least not the first time I am hearing it.

CX is binding

Ev comparison is good
Impact calc and line by line are a must

Please explain Lincoln Douglas specific arguments fully, I debate policy not Lincoln douglas

Clarity>Speed

Signpost please, if you don't I might miss card or argument whilst figuring out which flow your on.

Dropped args are true.

I am fine with aggressive cross X just don't degrade or swear against your opponents.

I like disads and counterplan debates, if your running T or K explain framework for K and, T I am not ask comfortable with but if you explain and weigh impact I will vote.

If you hide theory arguments your speaker points will go down but I will vote on them.

Theory arguments I am comfortable with but explain please.

I will yell clear if I cannot understand you after 2 times I will stop flowing for that speech.

Hi!

Reagan (she/her)

I'm a policy debater at Peninsula high school

add me to the email chain: reagan.vieira29@gmail.com

-spreading is fine as long as you have clarity

-organization and judge instruction is super important

-Quality>Quantity use your best points and be persuasive

-understand what you are reading, don't just read cards if you don't know what it means.

-open cross-x is fine

-tech>>truth

As a parent judge supporting my son's involvement in debate, I approach judging with an open mind and a focus on fairness. I value clear communication, logical arguments, and strong evidence to support claims. While I may not be familiar with every technical debate term, I appreciate when debaters explain their points thoroughly and engage respectfully. I am impartial and committed to evaluating the round based on the strength of the arguments presented, not personal opinions. Please prioritize clarity and ensure your points are well-structured for easy understanding.

Tech > Truth