I do not mind off-time road maps.  A clear outline of each point and subpoint during construction is imperative.  Linking each point to your value and criterion helps flow the case for judges and opponents. Definitions can make or break a case.  Be confident in your definitions.  Speak rapidly ONLY if you can also speak clearly. I like to see passion.

Overall, I am a stock issues judge but I will flow anything. I do like theory arguments to an extent, but I can't and won't vote on anything without evidence. Speed is fine but I need to be able to understand your taglines. As far as impacts go, I really like seeing debaters connect the impacts to me and show me why I should care.

I'll listen to any arguments, but stock issues are usually key for me. I'm not a fan of counterplans. If you run T or Ks, make sure you run it right or don't even bother. Speed is fine, but I have to be able to hear your taglines.